User:Zawed/Sandbox
GA
review
(see
here
for what the criteria are, and
here
for what they are not)
It is
reasonably well written
.
a
(prose, spelling, and grammar)
:
b
(
MoS
for
lead
,
layout
,
word choice
,
fiction
, and
lists
)
:
It is
factually accurate
and
verifiable
.
a
(
reference section
)
:
b
(citations to
reliable sources
)
:
c
(
OR
)
:
d
(
copyvio
and
plagiarism
)
:
It is
broad in its coverage
.
a
(
major aspects
)
:
b
(
focused
)
:
It follows the
neutral point of view
policy
.
Fair representation without bias
:
It is
stable
.
No edit wars, etc.
:
It is illustrated by
images
and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a
(images are tagged and non-free content have
fair use rationales
)
:
b
(
appropriate use
with
suitable captions
)
:
Overall
:
Pass/Fail
:
Good Article
review progress box
Criteria
:
1a.
prose (
)
1b.
MoS
(
)
2a.
ref layout
(
)
2b.
cites
WP:RS
(
)
2c.
no
WP:OR
(
)
2d.
no
WP:CV
(
)
3a.
broadness (
)
3b.
focus (
)
4.
neutral
(
)
5.
stable
(
)
6a.
free or tagged images
(
)
6b.
pics relevant (
)
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the
Good Article criteria
. Criteria marked
are unassessed
Check can be y, n, or =