User talk:Agnostos Theos

Retired
This user is no longer active on Wikipedia.

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Agnostos Theos (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #27238 was submitted on Oct 21, 2019 10:56:03. This review is now closed.


--UTRSBot (talk) 10:56, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Agnostos Theos (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I started contributing to Wikipedia on a public IP address in my local library. One day I forgotten to sign out and the next day I saw a large number of edits that I'm unaware of. That's when I realized that someone used my account without my permission and started to violate and make disruptions through my account. The next day I'm notified that my account is listed and facing topic ban procedure. I was devastated because it was not my fault. Everything that came after that topic ban maybe my fault because I neglected that warning and started contributing. Because of my amateur knowledge about these banning procedures and my strive to contributing, my account then blocked indefinitely. I'm now revoking all my actions caused by my inept knowledge about Wikipedia's guidelines, solely because I was an amateur in this platform and I was just started to learn all the rules and regulations about Wikipedia's editing procedures. Same goes with my careless creation of sockpuppetry to avoid topic ban. That the block is no longer necessary because I understand why I was blocked for, I will not do it again, and I will make productive contributions instead. My conduct (under any account or IP address) is not connected in any way with the block. I was blocked as a result because I used the same IP range.

Decline reason:

Since you state that you left your account unsecured on a public computer and it was used by others, this account is now considered compromised and is ineligible to be unblocked. 331dot (talk) 10:16, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Agnostos Theos (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I started contributing to Wikipedia on a public IP address in my local library. One day I forgotten to sign out and the next day I saw a large number of edits that I'm unaware of. That's when I realized that someone used my account without my permission and started to violate and make disruptions through my account. The next day I'm notified that my account is listed and facing topic ban procedure. I was devastated because it was not my fault. Everything that came after that topic ban maybe my fault because I neglected that warning and started contributing. Because of my amateur knowledge about these banning procedures and my strive to contributing, my account then blocked indefinitely. I'm now revoking all my actions caused by my inept knowledge about Wikipedia's guidelines, solely because I was an amateur in this platform and I was just started to learn all the rules and regulations about Wikipedia's editing procedures. Same goes with my careless creation of sockpuppetry to avoid topic ban. That the block is no longer necessary because I understand why I was blocked for, I will not do it again, and I will make productive contributions instead. My conduct (under any account or IP address) is not connected in any way with the block. I was blocked as a result because I used the same IP range.

Decline reason:

I'm sorry, I cannot unblock you at this time. In the one statement, you say your account was compromised and someone else edited using the same IP. Then you say you violated your TBAN and committed sockpuppetry out of ignorance of the rules. Either way, you have not addressed the reasons for your block. Using multiple accounts to avoid sanctions such as a TBAN or a block is very serious. Please read Wikipedia:SOCKBLOCK carefully. Please read Wikipedia:Compromised accounts carefully.-- Deepfriedokra 03:55, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.