User talk:Betswiki

Hi, thanks for making a change in the "ellipsis" section at WP:MOS. On WT:MOS#Stability and WP:CONSENSUS, we've just started talking again about how to figure out which changes have "consensus", and I pointed to your edit as an example of something that might not have consensus. In fact, the point is that there wasn't anything terribly wrong with your edit, but that's not the point; there's a message at the top of every guideline and policy page that says "make sure your edit reflects consensus"...that is, not just a good idea, but something Wikipedians believe already. Please feel free to join in the discussion. This wasn't aimed at you personally, of course, I don't believe we've met. - Dan Dank55 (talk)(mistakes) 20:26, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your change has a few problems with wording; but of course it reflects English usage.WP:MOS has a long history of reflecting the prejudices of a handful of editors who wish to revise the English language; this is a long-standing dispute which you have been unfortunate enough to step in the middle of. Please don't take this personally, and enjoy editing Wikipedia. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 22:32, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

thanks betswiki (talk) 05:22, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

thanks betswiki (talk) 05:23, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]