Hello Calmypal, welcome to Wikipedia. Here are some useful links in case you haven't already found them;
If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!
Angela 03:35, Nov 6, 2003 (UTC)
Hi Cal :) Usually we only link once to another article, and we leave further occurances of the term unlinked. The Guinness book was linked once up the top, so doesn't need to be linked again.
Thanks Dysprosia 03:16, 8 Nov 2003 (UTC)
It may seem rather ironic but I have just deleted Inclusionist. This sort of thing should only be on Meta as it is not helping Wikipedia in any way. The Wikipedia:Wikipedians by inclusionism/deletionism should also be on Meta, and has been deleted by someone else. Although there are some similar pages that exist here, the plan is to move all of these to Meta as well. I think you'll find the m:Inclusionism already has a list like this anyway, so do feel to contribute over there instead. Angela 20:47, Nov 8, 2003 (UTC)
I think you may slightly confused about the namespaces we use here as you want to have your inclusionist article in the main namespace. This is the area for the encyclopedia proper. The Wikipedia-namespace (prefix Wikipedia:) contains info about Wikipedia: how to use it, etc. See Wikipedia:Namespace for further explanation. Pages that contain information on user's affiliation to notions such as inclusionism play no part in an encyclopedia, which is what this is, so have no place on this site. I have responded to your other comments by e-mail. Angela 22:39, Nov 8, 2003 (UTC)
Calmypal, would you please stop adding articles with obviously totally irrelevant content like Joe Ahmed and Wikipedia:Wikipedians by Facial Hair? You may wish to consider what Wikipedia is not; also, you may have read this and this. If I remember correctly, there has already been some debate about your tendency to ridicule people as exemplified by creating Engime's Theory of Pure Absurdity that pretended to be an article but was in fact just an attack on so-called deletionists. So please stop it, this attitude will certainly not gain you much support here.Kosebamse 20:22, 13 Nov 2003 (UTC)
That was not an attack on deletionists. Give me another example where that theory could be supported, and I'll admit that I should have thought of that and used it instead. Anyway, I want to know what Wikipedians have what facial hair! - Arthur George Carrick 19:20, 14 Nov 2003 (UTC)
More about that article of yours at my talk page. I would like to note that it has been considered trolling by the sysop who deleted it, but that's past - I don't want to argue about what you did in the past, just wish to tell you that Wikipedia wants your knowledge, not your provocations. Kosebamse 19:31, 14 Nov 2003 (UTC)
I retract all above statements. I was a stupid angry confused newbie. - Woodrow 23:37, 25 Mar 2004 (UTC)