This ridiculousness has to stop right now. The attention of professional historians (like JTD and myself) and professional editors like Zoe, (whose sharp competence I initially mistook for meanness, for which I’m deeply ashamed) is being diverted from making vital contributions. Instead, some of the most productive users are wasting their time babysitting Lir/Vera/Susan/Dietary/Adam. 172
HERE'S THE PROOF: DIETARY=SUSAN: http://www.wikipedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/2003-April/002479.html
172
- Being dodgy historically means nothing to Lir/Vera/Dietary/Susan/Adam. This thing just feeds off being an enraging nuisance. 172
- I'm not sure who's in the "right", but I think it'd be in everyone's best interest if I protected the pages for the time being. I'll make a note of it at the village pump as well. Any objections? -- Notheruser 07:01 Apr 12, 2003 (UTC) none whatsoever. STÓD/ÉÍRE 07:12 Apr 12, 2003 (UTC)
- RK reverted my edits at Idolatry which isn't too big of a deal, but then he deleted my comments at Talk:Idolatry which makes it kind of hard to discuss things. Dietary Fiber
- As you've been told over and over again under multiple incarnations, differences of opinion are not vandalism. -- Zoe