User talk:Dysprosia/Archive (4)

Old talk in archive: User_talk:Dysprosia/Archive -- User_talk:Dysprosia/Archive_(2) -- User_talk:Dysprosia/Archive_(3)(most recent)

Still finding my way around - thanks for the edits and redirects ;) richard

Thanks for the kind words Dysprosia. I hope I'm doing all of this right. I'm trained as a journalist, so hopefully that'll be put to good use. :-)

Thanks for the note -Voyager640.

In regards to Annisa, that article had a list of "Trivia" at the end of it. My intention was to move those bits of information into the main article. It reads better. Kingturtle 06:50, 5 Nov 2003 (UTC)

Yes, I did so as well, (I think some weirdness happened since I reverted and you plain-edited). If you didn't see my edits before you did edit, let me know, I'm going to remove the stuff on the schooling since it's not really necessary. Dysprosia 06:52, 5 Nov 2003 (UTC)

How is it not relevant? The page is about who she was, where she lived and what she did...jeez can't we compromise? I allowed you guys to reformat my writing because your way was better... Shawn

It's not relevant because it's just trivia. It's not really notable. If something interesting happened at those schools, then it should be mentioned and the links put back in, but an article isn't a resume :) But good work otherwise! Keep it up Dysprosia 07:08, 5 Nov 2003 (UTC)

Hi Dysprosia, I see you edited the article Cambodia: A Book For People Who Find Television too Slow I just created. Thanks. But I fear you've made it innaccurate by removing some of the biblio detail I put in. I've allready changed 1998 back to 1988, but you made it sound like the ISBM I gave was for the first publication. It appeared twice in 1988, same edition, but once with a Canadian publisher and then with an American. It was the US version that I read the ISBN off of, so the one on the page is not the one of first publication. (It's OK to tell me I am fretting over miniscule details.) Thanks, vanden 08:12, 5 Nov 2003 (UTC)

Hiya :) Yes, I was trying to clean up some of the excess, I don't think too much bibliog. info is really necessary. I'll just make a short note on the article to reflect your points :) Dysprosia 09:11, 6 Nov 2003 (UTC)

Hey again, Saw the change and I am much happier with it now. I agree in retrospect that I had too much there too. (New and still getting a sense of the place.) Just wanted to let you know I'd seen your reply. Thanks, vanden 08:55, 8 Nov 2003 (UTC)