User talk:Kinu/Archive 11

Oh, thank you! Those useless pages are annoying. Possibly spam, maybe? --Spidey665, 23:34, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for blocking Bridge1991 he/she is a spammer and creating spam pages. I appreciate that block, thank you very much. --Spidey665, 23:45, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

How to write a topic..? Sorry, I'm new to Wikipedia. ya, anyways.. Hi, Kinu Panda! What a coincidence, my parents call me Panpan! It means panda too. My concern is on Meng Bie. She is actually my roommate. Let me give the reasons why her name should stay on wiki! She is an award-winning young poet, well known in her home country, China. The page is a translation of the facts. Her information is only available in Chinese for now. I guess it's good to have the English translation on wiki too. :) She is also the author of two books, column editor and writer for the UT Chinese Magazine. http://utchinese.org Info on her publications: http://www.hzsdyfz.com.cn:8088/Article/ShowArticle.asp?ArticleID=1741 The girl in white is her. http://book.douban.com/subject/6429500/ - that's her second book published this year. A famous R&B songwriter and singer actually wrote preface for her book! And this is his wiki page: http://zh.wikipedia.orgview_html.php?sq=Qlik&lang=&q=%E5%90%8E%E5%BC%A6 And these are her awards: First Prize in the Chinese National Mathematics Competition (high school session), 2005. One of the Best 10 Young Poets in the Grand China Literature, Painting, and Photography Contest, 2006. Gifted Poet in the Hubei Provincial Competition in School Publications, 2007. Please reconsider it! Thank you! Good night, Kinu :) Iosonosuri (talk) 04:26, 27 September 2011 (UTC)

I notice you deleted a potential Wiki article for Lacey Gibson, leaving the note :- 18:50, 14 April 2011 Kinu (talk | contribs) deleted "Lacy Gibson" ‎ (G12: Unambiguous copyright infringement of http://www.alligator.com/index.cfm?section=news&newsID=476) I am starting to compile an article for this musician, hopefully without any such copyright issues, and would ask your kind permission to proceed. Thank you,

Derek R Bullamore (talk) 14:35, 12 October 2011 (UTC)

Call me impulsive, but without a reply in over twenty four hours, I created the article. Please feel free, when you are able, to check it does not contravene Wiki guidelines. Thanks,

Derek R Bullamore (talk) 15:11, 13 October 2011 (UTC)

It appears that the new article is suitable. Thank you for the rewrite. --Kinu ^t/_c 01:19, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

Hi there, There is a discussion related to an article that you had blocked the page creation. Appreciate your thoughts on this -- Tinu Cherian - 14:54, 25 October 2011 (UTC)

I had protected the article title after it was recreated as what was almost an attack page. As noted in the discussion, this article looks substantially different and appears much better sourced than the previously AfDed version. I've gone ahead and unprotected the previous location and have moved the article accordingly. --Kinu ^t/_c 16:57, 25 October 2011 (UTC)

Thnx Kinu. -- Tinu Cherian - 03:04, 28 October 2011 (UTC)

Good afternoon. The article for The Yogscast has been deleted, with the rationale that it was an "Article about a web site, blog, web forum, webcomic, podcast, browser game, or similar web content, which does not indicate the importance or significance of the subject." I recognize that the previous version might not have provided enough notability information, however that information is available. For instance, Edge Magazine is running an article about The Yogscast's growing influence in the gaming world. I have no personal interest in the subject, I just wanted to bring this article to your attention. Thank you! --- Stephen Goldmeier | Profile | Talk | (._.) | 19:21, 30 October 2011 (UTC)

Thanks. In fact, by the time you did it I had just worked out what I had done wrong, and you edit-conflicted my attempt to put it right. JamesBWatson (talk) 16:41, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

• No worries. I ran across it because we'd actually edit conflicted on the unblock request (or whatever you want to call that incoherent mess) itself, as I was about to decline it myself. :P --Kinu ^t/_c 16:44, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

• The "incoherent mess" was one of the factors which contributed to removing any faint trace of doubt as to whether to unblock. It was one more piece of evidence of lack of WP:COMPETENCE to add to the other reasons. JamesBWatson (talk) 21:15, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

I'm going to be a lot busier in the future and I no longer have enough time on my hands for Wikipedia, sad to say. It's become too much of a distraction for me and I think I need to cut it cold turkey. Could you do me a favor and block me to make it official and to prevent me from "relapsing" at some point in the future? Thanks, Difluoroethene (talk) 16:11, 11 November 2011 (UTC)

• I'm sorry to see you go... as indicated in the block log, if you ever decide to come back, feel free to e-mail me or any other admin. Good luck with everything in real life. --Kinu ^t/_c 20:57, 18 November 2011 (UTC)

	The Admin's Barnstar
	Thanks for taking care of the situation with 70.240.194.100 (talk · contribs · info · WHOIS). Keep up the fabulous work! Darth Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 23:59, 25 November 2011 (UTC)

• Glad to be of assistance... thank you! --Kinu ^t/_c 02:01, 29 November 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for subduing and blocking Cowback23451. Can I remove his Level 4 warning on my talk page accusing me of serious vandalism? Smartyllama (talk) 00:05, 29 November 2011 (UTC)

• Not a problem... and yes, the vandalism warning placed on your talk page was wholly unjustified, so feel free to remove it. --Kinu ^t/_c 02:01, 29 November 2011 (UTC)

You are a terrible person. You deletzored my article on my 1 man super band1!#$!!@ I had tons of citzors from myspace music, . Also http://www.ICanHasBandDomainCheapAtGoDaddy.com/mybandPropoganda.html cites the 10 VMA's I willw in in the future. You can remedy this by going to trivia tonight! Chrislk02 ^{Chris Kreider} 16:36, 29 November 2011 (UTC)

• Thread opened at ANI... LULULULZ. I hope this means your Wikibreak is over. --Kinu ^t/_c 17:44, 29 November 2011 (UTC)

I see that you replaced a PRODBLP on Muthu Mudalige Nissanka with an AfD. I just wondered why. What was wrong with leaving the PRODBLP? (I'm not objecting, just wondering.) JamesBWatson (talk) 10:40, 30 November 2011 (UTC)

• Ah, that is curious, but I think I know what happened. I ran across this article after seeing the report on the creator at AIV, and must've AfDed it without recognizing that part of the disruption he was causing was the repeated PROD tag removal. Oh well... the article will be gone soon either way, I'm certain. --Kinu ^t/_c 03:47, 1 December 2011 (UTC)

Just in case you're interested... Peridon (talk) 22:49, 30 November 2011 (UTC)

• Thanks for the heads up. --Kinu ^t/_c 03:47, 1 December 2011 (UTC)

You deleted an article I created for a well known satirical website here in Ireland called 'Waterford Whispers News. I'm just wondering why you deleted it as there are similar articles on satirical websites on Wiki:

http://en.wikipedia.orgview_html.php?sq=Qlik&lang=&q=The_Spanner

http://en.wikipedia.orgview_html.php?sq=Qlik&lang=&q=NewsBiscuit

Can you explain why my article was deleted and these ones were allowed?

Thank You — Preceding unsigned comment added by TramoreBin (talk • contribs) 11:42, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

• The article did not contain a credible claim of importance and was deleted under speedy deletion criterion A7. Please note that the existence of other articles on a similar topic cannot justify the existence of others (nonetheless, the first one is possibly questionable; however, the second one is referenced and appears legitimate). --Kinu ^t/_c 19:17, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

Hey - you just blocked 88.156.199.180 for their recent edits on The Pink Panther Show; thought you should know they've just started up again using 178.235.164.163. According to the geoloate links, their location is identical; same provider, exact latitude/longitude match - see [1] and [2]. FYI... :) MikeWazowski (talk) 19:06, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

• I've gone ahead and blocked the IP... pretty obvious block evasion, if you ask me. Thanks for keeping an eye on the article. If things get further out of hand, I'll go ahead and semi-protect it. --Kinu ^t/_c 19:10, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
  • ... oh, and seeing as how WP:AGF has gone out the window now, I've extended the block on the user who is quite obviously behind this vandalism to an indefinite one. --Kinu ^t/_c 19:12, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

What do you think--time for semi-protection? There's no need to leave it open for the sock farm--CU will have enough evidence to find sleepers if they want to. I see few positive IP contributions. Drmies (talk) 22:58, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

• Yeah, I'm inclined to agree here. The IPs are (obviously) not contributing anything toward any consensus, so the discussion wouldn't be missing anything. I'm about to be AFK so I'll leave that to you. --Kinu ^t/_c 23:06, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

Hi Kinu - thanks for this, and for looking into the problem. Your help is much appreciated! Best, Kafka Liz (talk) 10:44, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

I saw you added {{external links}} to the Indiana House elections article. I assume your objection's to the relatively uncommon practice of having a whole load of little external links sections rather than one big one at the end? If so, I agree to an extent but would point out that all WP:EL has to say on the matter (unless I've missed something) is "If an article has external links, the standard format is to place them in a bulleted list under a primary heading at the end of the article." So it's standard practice but by no means a concrete requirement, and in this and similar articles I think smaller sections make it much easier for the reader to find specific campaigns' sites. (Also the second part of the template's problematic: hopefully we can agree there aren't any excessive or inappropriate links in need of removal.) Your thoughts? – hysteria18 (talk) 14:23, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

passing by, it's so much the standard practice that it amounts to an almost universally observed guideline. DGG ( talk ) 01:05, 6 December 2011 (UTC)

Hey, sorry about that, accidentally hit rollback instead of restore previous version. You beat me to the further edits! Just wanted to emphasize that I was being careful! ialsoagree (talk) 02:49, 6 December 2011 (UTC)

• No worries! It happens to all of us when that kind of junk starts to pile up on those days of the year lists. Your help in fighting vandalism is appreciated! --Kinu ^t/_c 21:21, 6 December 2011 (UTC)

I saw your revert (and re-revert). I see the problem in {{Collapse top}} where the header is now only centered in IE. That could be easily fixed inline, though I am also not sure why archive templates are using the navbox class in the first place. Am I correct to asume the header is supposed to be centered? — Edokter (talk) — 22:22, 6 December 2011 (UTC)

• Correct, the header has always been centered, so I'm assuming that it still should be (I couldn't find any discussion indicating any sort of drastic stylistic change, and seeing as how it still does it in IE, I'm assuming there is none). I'm curious though... that template hasn't been edited in months, but I've only noticed the issue as of today... but I suppose it's best not to overthink this on my end. You seem to be have a better handle of the CSS here, so if you could have a go at fixing it, that'd be much appreciated! --Kinu ^t/_c 22:28, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
• Oh, and in case more context would be helpful, the reason I noticed was because I use a custom version of a collapsible navbox (User:Kinu/TT+User:Kinu/TB) on my user and talk pages, and saw the broken centering there (the title has always been centered and I've never used a center tag). I'm guessing something that's referenced therein is what's broken. --Kinu ^t/_c 22:34, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
  • I did change the CSS for navbox, which prompted the change you saw. Truth be told, the navbox class is slightly abused in this context, because archive boxes aren't navboxes. And I cannot forsee anything beyond that for which the code is ment for. I changed {{Collapse top}} by simply adding text-align:center; to it's header. You can make this change safely to any other archive box that may be affected. — Edokter (talk) — 22:46, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
    • Thanks for looking into this. And I agree that the benefits of fixing the CSS for that template for the purposes you mention on the CSS talk page thread definitely outweigh the negatives (i.e., some relatively minor broken aesthetics). I agree, there's a fair amount of abuse of the navbox template going on, so when I get the chance I'll take a look at some of the other templates and see if there is something more elegant that can be done. Thanks again. --Kinu ^t/_c 23:06, 6 December 2011 (UTC)

Just giving you a heads up. I've been talking to User:TexasAndroid and User:Kuru about planning a meetup. We're thinking about picking a corner of town and knocking out some of the photos on this list. Of course, it wouldnt be just the four of us. We'd advertise it and see how many folks we can get to show up. This would be the first San Antonio meetup. What do you think?--v/r - TP 01:43, 8 December 2011 (UTC)

• I would definitely be interested in that, and can think of a few other editors from around here who might be as well. Definitely keep me in the loop. --Kinu ^t/_c 17:36, 8 December 2011 (UTC)

Here's a beer to go with that lovely wiener of yours. Happy days! Drmies (talk) 20:54, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

• Excellent... I could definitely use one. Thanks! --Kinu ^t/_c 21:18, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

To: User:NawlinWiki, User:Salvio giuliano and User:Kinu

You are all admins. I'd like to point out what you did regarding Ozark outdoors. This was a poorly written article on a possibly notable subject (a medium-sized company that has existed for decades). It was written by User:Ozarkworld, a new editor who had done some research and written original copy on the subject. However, User:Ozarkworld was not aware wiki standards and rules. Here is what you did:

1. User:NawlinWiki deleted the article without giving the creator any help with establishing notability despite User:Ozarkworld asking for help.
2. User:Salvio giuliano gave User:Ozarkworld an indefinite block.
3. When User:Ozarkworld appealed the ban giving a reasonable explanation for his or her username, User:Kinu declined the appeal because User:Ozarkworld also said something in the appeal that he didn't like.

Great work guys. Now rather than us having a new editor User:Ozarkworld has left wikipedia never to come back. Delete and block are not the only things admins are able to do. Sometimes you could try engaging with new editors who do not know the rules.

(PS. Dissent is permitted. Please don't block me) --Bucephalus (talk) 17:53, 13 December 2011 (UTC)

• Your concern is noted. To be fair, however, when a user indicates that they do not wish to return, this is generally interpreted as not being a good faith unblock request. --Kinu ^t/_c 06:50, 14 December 2011 (UTC)

Hi! I'd be very happy if you could help with this request. Particularly with the image which will soon be on wikipedia's mainpage as DYK. Thanks. bamse (talk) 09:38, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

I noticed that you deleted substantial portions of my start of the article on San Antonio author Robert Flynn.

Namely: the photo from his author website, and a paragraph or two. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Robert_Flynn_%28author%29&diff=462459283&oldid=462459022

It's been a while ago since I looked at that article, but it seems to me that you removed a lot of factual information. What proof do you need to convince you that Robert Flynn approves of wikipedia's usage of his photo and his brief bio paragraph? Would it be sufficient for him to send you a one or two sentence email? Or would you prefer just to knock on his door in San Antonio? You can email me: idiotprogrammer at gmail.com

Incidentally, I was thinking of donating my CC photo of Robert Flynn to Wikipedia, http://www.flickr.com/photos/rjnagle/3068680039/in/set-72157610446577380, but it seems that if you are rejecting his promotional photo, you probably would still require a release from flynn himself (if you wanted to be a stickler). As I said, perhaps the best solution is for you to knock on his door and get his permission personally. --Robert J Nagle (talk) 06:35, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

• It's not about being a "stickler" as you put it, but about Wikipedia's serious stance on copyright. Because the content on his website states that it is copyrighted, the only legitimate method for using it on Wikipedia would be as indicated at WP:DCM under the section "Granting us permission to copy material already online"; that is, the copyright notice needs to be modified to make it compatible with Wikipedia's licensing policies. I find your suggestion that I "knock on his door" to get permission unconstructive and unnecessary. As for your photo, since you indicate that it is a compatible license, I see no other issues with that. --Kinu ^t/_c 00:10, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

Dear Kinu

I'm typing to request you reconsider the deletion of the article "The Yogscast". I was terribly surprised to see that the greatest encyclopedia doesn't believe yogscast deserve recognition as one of the biggest youtube channels. Perhaps you don't believe such chanels have true significance in society but i say Yogscast is as part of my culture as any TV progam or series of books, it's an enjoyable aspect of my everyday life and is so for over 1 million others. I think it's very backward of wikipedia to ignore an internet identity on the grow especialy since wikapedia aso was born through the same media. Tt may seem goofy to you but ignoring us yognaughts from my point of view is not in the spirit of wikipedia.

Thank you for your time. yours sincerely andrewsp33.Andrewsp33 (talk) 22:51, 22 December 2011 (UTC)

• This article was protected after being deleted multiple times, but the primary reason for deletion was the deletion discussion here. What reliable sources do you have to counter the arguments for deletion presented there? If you have any, I would take them to deletion review and follow the process there. --Kinu ^t/_c 00:12, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

A sockpuppeteer that you blocked, User:Hermanator1 is now editing under the name User:Hermanator2. --William S. Saturn (talk) 00:47, 30 December 2011 (UTC)

• Blocked indefinitely, along with User:Hermanator3 through User:Hermanator16 or so. Thanks for the heads up. --Kinu ^t/_c 03:10, 30 December 2011 (UTC)

Hi Kinu, is this a reliable source: [3] ? I added it to the Yale University article talk page to finally settle the disputed edits over writing Yale was a big Three college, but is this source reliable? Abhijay (☎ Talk) (✐ Deeds) 02:08, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

Hi Kinu. In December you dealt with this blocked user/sock: User:Andyscotlandlewis / User:Highlandjacobite / User:Caledoniankilt. He's currently editing under this username: User:Cormag100. Same editing patterns: most obvious is that they are all fascinated by the height of William Wallace; he actually gives his full name on his userpage "Andrew Lewis", and says at the top of his userpage: "PS: this user has two accounts but knows how to use them correctly!".--Brianann MacAmhlaidh (talk) 07:24, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

• I'll investigate further and see what I can find. Thanks for bringing this to my attention. --Kinu ^t/_c 00:45, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

This user has returned and gone immediately back to their WP:OWN ways. Can we get a longer block for said member? They obviously are not learning their lesson, as I knew they would not. _{MusicFreak7676} ^TALK! 21:48, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

Volume 5, Issue 1 • Winter 2011 • About the Newsletter
This edition is going out to all USRD WikiProject members (current, former, or potential) in addition to other subscribers as part of a roll call to update the participants list. Anyone that would like to continue to receive this newsletter in the future needs to update the subscription list if they are not already subscribed.
Departments Assessment roundup Portal selected articles and pictures	Features U.S. Roads consolidates M-6 article makes headlines Planning Department debuts Stub drive concludes early, successfully Editorial	State and national updates Project news Task force reports for MD, MI, PA, and VA
Archives • Newsroom • Full Issue • Shortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS

—Imzadi 1979 → 22:07, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for appropriately blocking 96.25.215.29 for vandalism. Please delete this section after reading. David Spector (talk) 01:39, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

Could you block 2.36.176.55 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) also, it's the same person as Alexia 96 (talk · contribs), committing the same vandalism. The Mark of the Beast (talk) 22:04, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

• Done, along with the new IP that's continuing the same garbage. --Kinu ^t/_c 22:05, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

Thanks. The Mark of the Beast (talk) 22:07, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

thank you for catching that. a lot of the internet related articles are not well watched. :) -badmachine 23:15, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

Hi, what about blocking IPs or IP ranges? Thanks. --Xtv - (my talk) - (que dius que què?) 22:50, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

Hi, there's been a a personal attack at my talk page. May you please block the user because there's been an issue that has been going on for some time now. Abhijay (☎ Talk) (✐ Deeds) 02:36, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

• To be frank, I'm going to leave this to ANI. --Kinu ^t/_c 23:01, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

Hello Kinu,

Thank you for looking at my edit of the Biometrics Wiki page. I realise now that I put my edit into the wrong section.

What I would ideally like to do is start a new section on Uses of Biometrics or similar. The current one entitled "Current, emerging and future applications of biometrics" doesn't really explain the different uses of biometrics (which includes fingerprint identification, anti-fraud, security etc) and the whole article doesn't flow very well. The section I tried to edit "Biometric functionality" contains a lot of information about biometrics uses so it seems muddled. I will try to do a longer edit that solves this problem as I don't think it's a very strong article on biometrics in the current form. MiloStewart--Milostewart (talk) 10:36, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

Can you provide me with a copy of the deleted article? She is now notable!HotHat (talk) 06:28, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

• Charting source!HotHat (talk) 06:39, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
  • Restored and note left on your talk page. --Kinu ^t/_c 21:46, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
    • Thanks, I am going to work on the article.HotHat (talk) 04:04, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
      • So, Do you think that I have proved notability of this artist for inclusion on Wikipedia like I did Matt Hammitt and Dara Maclean, and if so do you think I deserve to have the autopatroled feature added to my account?HotHat (talk) 04:59, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

I saw you were tagging and blocking around what I investigated a bit earlier. Thought I might share my notes. :) -- DQ (ʞlɐʇ) 22:40, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

Kudos for being so patient on the WQA page regarding the potential outing of a user. I imagine that she may still need to learn a little about civility, but she can have no complaints regarding your saint-like patience.LedRush (talk) 14:30, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

I believe that 94.141.94.5 might be an open proxy, as it is showing up as a "mail server". Don't think one can use the same IP as a "mail server". - Neutralhomer • Talk • 20:57, 19 March 2012 (UTC)

Hi Kinu,

I'm just informing you that I've modified some of your sock blocks a bit. I hope you don't mind. :) Elockid ^(Talk) 23:10, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

• Not a problem. I figured most, if not all, of those were open proxies, so thanks for tagging them! --Kinu ^t/_c 05:58, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

Hi, um this user [4] may or may not have posted personal information about you on the Sandbox. Ab hijay  ☎ 13:33, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

• Thanks for the heads up. --Kinu ^t/_c 14:15, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

I'm having some difficulty seeing the rationalization behind this block. I don't understand what organization you think they were promoting, when and where edits problematic enough to justify a block were made, and what organization you believe the username represent. I searched their name and although I found it is a handle they use on numerous websites, I didn't find any organizations by that name. Some clarity on these issues would be very helpful in evaluating the unblock request. Thanks. Beeblebrox (talk) 16:48, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

• I've responded on the user's talk page, but nonetheless I'll indicate here for the record that I wouldn't be averse to an unblock. --Kinu ^t/_c 02:27, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Fapping. Since you had some involvement with the Fapping redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Mercurywoodrose (talk) 18:22, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

116.251.160.182. Doing vandalism checks and ran into this and don't know what to do. TxJobberone (talk) 22:24, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

Hi Kinu, I hope you're well. I'd like to ask you for help with the two entries mentioned in the heading -smugging and sofalising. I think you are aware about my situation... Both of these entries have been proposed to be deleted. I've been waiting and hoping that the community would pick this up but nobody raised any complaint or express any opinion in the talk sections. If I don't do anything today or tomorrow morning, they will be deleted. What do you think I should do? Should I try and make them better...somehow? I think they are both balanced and properly referenced...I've seen entries with less references than these two before and they are still up. Please let me know, I'd really appreciate your guidance in this matter... Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kt1502 (talk • contribs) 19:36, 27 March 2012 (UTC)

See 89.235.13.5. Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather (talk) 23:38, 31 March 2012 (UTC)

I just thought I'd let you know that Michael Vincent McHugh, which you deleted and salted, has returned; see Michael vincent McHugh. Chris the Paleontologist (talk • contribs) 01:04, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

Hi Kinu, I'm just wondering about a page you recently protected. I notice your semi-protected SWAT because of edit warring and then blocked the IP involved. I was just wondering if that was the best course of action to take: it was not just the IP edit warring (Niteshift36 also broke 3RR), so only blocking him and not fully protecting the page seems to favour one side, especially since the issue of contention has not been discussed on the talk page since 2007. I didn't want to do anything without asking you first, but I'd be interested to hear your reasoning (and it may just be that I've missed something). Thanks. ItsZippy ^{(talk • contributions)} 20:31, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

Hi Kinu, I see that you are the admin who deleted the page stub for the organisation Press for Change. I am a subject expert in this area, involved in recovering lost information about this important activist organisation which was responsible for (among other things) bringing about two acts of parliament protecting the rights of a small minority. I have prepared a fully referenced entry about the organisation but I wanted to check with you first whether to press ahead and simply create a new page or whether you could undelete the stub for me to build the content? Plainsense (talk) 06:00, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

Update. Hi again Kinu. Since writing the above note this morning I see that, quite by coincidence, another editor has initiated a page for Press for Change. Please therefore disregard the above query. Note that I have suggested the copy I had in mind in the Talk page to the entry, so editors can choose independently what to use. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Plainsense (talk • contribs) 20:17, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

Hi Kinu

I've prepared a page for The Yogscast as a user page. I was wondering if you could take a look and let me know whether it, in your opinion, meets the community guidelines for inclusion. Here's the URL:

http://en.wikipedia.orgview_html.php?sq=Qlik&lang=&q=User:Bastawhiz/The_Yogscast

Any feedback is appreciated.

- bastawhiz — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bastawhiz (talk • contribs) 00:02, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

• Can you indicate which of the sources you believe meet WP:RS? I fail to see any, unfortunately. --Kinu ^t/_c 22:11, 17 May 2012 (UTC)

• Kinu, I think this article should be following WP:VG/RS instead of WP:RS, which is for general topics. Can you re-assess? - M0rphzone (talk) 22:54, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

How about moving this draft to the incubator for now? There is also another draft version by Metalbunny. They can be merged together and further improved. This topic should be notable enough; there are up to 10 userfied pages on the Yogscast, and I think those links in the last section of the Talk page should be some good RS. - M0rphzone (talk) 01:51, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

Any response to this? I'd like to think that a sufficient amount of work has been done in recent months to improve the quality of the references. With the funeded kickstarter project, the Bluexephos channel hitting one billion views, and the highly-publicized controversy, I should think that the Yogscast is certainly notable. What steps do we need to continue going through? --Matt (talk) 01:25, 6 July 2012 (UTC)

Whoa hold on a second... I searched up "yogscast" and there are currently 2 reasonably written drafts. One is this one, and the other is the one by Metalbunny. I think you guys can work together to merge the two draft versions and hopefully meet the WP:RS requirements. - M0rphzone 01:38, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

Update: The talk pages from both articles might be some help/have some good info: Bastawhiz's, Metalbunny's. - M0rphzone (talk) 02:05, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

I'm all for a collaboration. I've been away from the wiki for the past month or two (or more) for various reasons, which is why I never got around to hitting the "submit article" button. In the meantime some more stuff has shown up I just haven't had the time to do a write-up off. I don't have much experience with the stricter qualifier requirements for en.wiki - I've only scarsely worked with da.wiki. So anything we can figure out to create a qualifying article together, I'm all for (that's what the wikipedia is about anyway, isn't it?).Metalbunny (talk) 22:28, 27 May 2012 (UTC)

Hi Kinu, here's one you may have missed [5]. Thanks, 71.241.200.94 (talk) 21:34, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

As the user has reverted your changes at User talk:Querty55, you may want to revoke his talk page access too? - David Biddulph (talk) 17:56, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

I see that you've done so. Thanks. - David Biddulph (talk) 18:27, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

No problem, and sorry for the delay, as I was editing via my phone at the time. --Kinu ^t/_c 18:58, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

This is a notification from WikiProject Requested articles of the re-creation of Zawya, an article you previously deleted. Thanks. -- Eclipsed (talk) (COI Declaration) 22:58, 26 May 2012 (UTC)

Hi Kinu. I suppose it's always good to get confirmation from a checkuser before definitively declaring that someone is a sockpuppet. In this case it appears that the User:Dannyboy1209 2 account was created by an impersonator who thought it would be fun to get User:Dannyboy1209 in further trouble. I have corrected my mistaken block reason for this account; just wanted to give you a heads-up as well. Cheers, 28bytes (talk) 15:22, 27 May 2012 (UTC)

Hi, an IP is adding markers to articles on Wisconsin Highways, like this here. Is the alright? I reverted one via Huggle, when I found out that it happened across several articles so I left it there. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 16:50, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

• I would definitely say to revert those. They serve no purpose and are unsightly, and I'm sure they don't agree with any of the project's standards. --Kinu ^t/_c 17:00, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

Okay, thanks. Is it okay to use rollback or do I use Undo? --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 18:06, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

I actually went ahead and used rollback on most of them (since "revert widespread edits" is a legitimate use) and left the IP a note on their talk page. If you find any that I've missed, feel free to take care of those as well. Thanks! --Kinu ^t/_c 18:49, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

Sorry, you're right. I didn't look at the category page to see the template. Ideally, the proper category should be called "Category:Texas Farm and Ranch to Market Roads" with caps as TxDOT treats these as proper nouns. Fortguy (talk) 21:14, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

Per your comments on Talk:William Nordhaus regarding [6] you might keep in mind Lord Acton's "Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely." Special:Contributions/Arthur Rubin is an "activist" Admin. The article Arthur Rubin may be helpful. I've found is his words perpetually disingenuous. He uses Talk pages for disruptive editing, including deleting what others write that have apparently nothing to do with him. I say "nothing" since wp:COI is likely at issue here. It is is difficult to build a better wikipedia with this behavior allowed. This maybe helpful found on wp:Tea. Best wishes. 99.181.128.177 (talk) 05:16, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

I see no relevant discussion regarding the material you wish to include, which should be discussed on said talk page anyway. --Kinu ^t/_c 05:58, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

Perhaps you may want to put in your opinions at these Texas road categories under discussion. Fortguy (talk) 08:06, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

Hi Kinu. Would you mind revoking talkpage access for this guy as well? It's clear he intends to keep up his campaign of abuse there. Cheers, Yunshui 雲‍水 13:36, 9 July 2012 (UTC)