User talk:Mirv/Arbitration election

Archives by date
archive1 (27/01/04)
archive2 (pre-12/04/04 history)
archive3 (04/12–07/29/04)
archive4 (07/29–20/09/04)
archive5 (20/09–26/09/04)
archive6 (27/09–03/11/04)
archive7 (03/11–22/11/04)
archive8 (22/11–05/12/04)
archive9 (05/12–17/12/04)
archive10 (17/12/04–11/01/05)
archive11 (11/01/05–24/7/05)
archive12 (24/7/05–12/12/05)
archive13 (12/12/05–25/4/06)
Others
rubbish bin
AOL-using lawyer
Arbcom election
User talk:Mirv

Questions regarding my candidacy in the December 2004 Arbitration Committee elections should be placed below.

(William M. Connolley 23:46, 17 Nov 2004 (UTC)) Given that you are standing, why are you endorsing 6 candidates (9 if 9 places) rather than 5 (8)?

In endorsing a full slate of candidates, I'm operating with the assumption that I'm not going to be elected. My endorsements are for candidates I would like to see win, should I fail. —No-One Jones (m) 23:52, 17 Nov 2004 (UTC)
(William M. Connolley 23:55, 17 Nov 2004 (UTC)) Oh, OK. Don't be too downbeat though (self-fulfilling prophecies, etc).