 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Nairspecht. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
What I have done is more articulated the article, using reports came in reliable and leading sources, that's very common in wikipedia. The existing report in the box office section can't be regarded as a "neutral" source as it is a claim from producer. The Manorama report is odd and it's not adaquate for a neutral verification. That's why we articulated the most relevant reports regarding the subject in a neutral manner.
- @Rashghunzraj blazt: Agreed they are reliable sources, but since you say the claim is from a producer, things change. It should come from an official Mollywood box office reporter, and I don't think there is one. So, it would need more sources to add that type of data. Plus, you address yourself as we, why is that? And I suggest you sign your replies, please. Cheers! Nairspecht (talk) 08:10, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
- @Nairspecht: Pls review the addition once more, they were the facts based on various reports. Commonly subjective claims are not used to be regarded as "neutral" in wikipedia. The manorama report, which seems like subjective, also includes in my addition. Better check it with an administrator.Rashghunzraj blazt (talk) 1 January 2016 (UTC)
- @Rashghunzraj blazt: You may start a discussion on the film's talk page and see what others have to say about it. Nairspecht (talk) 08:36, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
