User talk:Nineteen Nightmares

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nineteen Nightmares (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I have been blocked for edit warring with three other users, GregJackP, Dmartinaus (now "Austex") and Minor4th. Admin Sarah blocked me because I believe she did not read a post of mine where I stated I would have nothing more to do with these users. I have not in fact logged into the site for several days and only found out today about the block. Please understand I do not want to imply Sarah is not an excellent admin, simply that she read one post, acted and probably missed the other one. Her reason for blocking me was to stop the interaction between the aforementioned three and myself, but there has been no contact, and will be none on my end, for at least a week. I also believe that her reason is faulty as the statement "I will not shut up..." does not mean I will continue to engage these editors, simply that I would alert an admin or post something on a talk page if I found something out of sync. Thanks for reviewing the case. Nineteen Nightmares (talk) 21:23, 17 July 2010 (UTC)Nineteen Nightmares[reply]

Decline reason:

When you return, the clarifications requested below would be helpful. Thanks. Kuru (talk) 16:02, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.