User talk:Veeck

Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames that give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; please take a moment to create a new account with a username that represents only yourself as an individual and which complies with our username policy. You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose.

If your username does not represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice.

You may simply create a new account, but you may prefer to change your username to one that complies with our username policy, so that your past contributions are associated with your new username. If you would prefer to change your username, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice. Thank you. Alexf^(talk) 14:26, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Veeck (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Since Veeck is my last name I really see no reason for this block. Please unblock. Veeck (talk) 11:30, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

No response to the concerns over external links in the last week; decline for now. only (talk) 11:39, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Why did you add a link to what I assume is your personal website here? Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 12:11, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Because I thought it would be nice for people to find an mac-os installer for the software that is described on the wikipedia page. Happened to me so I created those (also one for windows since its mono-based) installers which now can be downloaded from my page. Veeck (talk) 12:45, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Have a look at WP:ELNO. Do you still think it's appropriate to add a link to your website for the reason you stated? Why or why not? Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 12:59, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Sorry for my late answer. But I think that it doesn't matter what I think about the appropriateness of my entry since you already blocked me and my entry. Not sure how I have to proceed now to contribute to wikipedia, don't feel welcome here Veeck (talk) 20:47, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Veeck (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Wanted to start editing stuff, found out that this dispute is still open. I would remove my offending link from the page but I cannot since I am blocked. So how should I proceed now? Veeck (talk) 14:26, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

User is unresponsive. Yamla (talk) 13:55, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I have removed the link. While I'm inclined to give you another chance, we still need to know that you understand WP:ELNO and will abide by it. Knowing what you want to edit about would be helpful as well. 331dot (talk) 08:30, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I guess I violated section 11 and I wont post links to my personal homepage again. But then again why is the first link in that articles external links allowed? Although now dead, it pointed to the private homepage of the creator where the tool was found. As I assume this would only be allowed if the link was the original articles subject this doesnt seem to be the case here since its about Tiled Printing and not about the software itself. Anyway, I wanted to update the information about https://en.wikipedia.orgview_html.php?sq=&lang=&q=Modernizr a software which I help develop these days.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Veeck (talk • contribs)

Please review conflict of interest which will explain why editing about the software that you worked on is problematic. Other potentially problematic external links existing does not mean that yours is permitted too; you can either remove a problematic link or discuss the matter on the article talk page. 331dot (talk) 12:59, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]