Wikipedia:2015 administrator election reform/Phase II/RfC

This RfC has been closed by Nihonjoe. I am simply archiving this RfC so that it will be clear that the discussion is closed. The following conclusions were reached:
(1): RfAs will be advertised on MediaWiki:Watchlist-details;
(2): RfAs will be advertised on Template:Centralized discussion;
(3): Individual editors may ask only two questions per candidate, with relevant follow-ups permitted;
(4): The discretionary range has been expanded from the previous de facto 70–75% to 65–75%. Biblioworm 17:11, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Summary of results
Question	Support	Oppose	% support	Result
#A1: Advertise RfAs with a site banner	0	35	0	Failed
#A2: Advertise RfAs with a watchlist notice	85	12	88	Passed
#A3: Advertise RfAs on WP:CENT	41	7	85	Passed
#B1: Disallow threaded discussion on the main RfA page	16	46	26	Failed
#B2: Limit the number of questions...by any individual editor	82	24	77	Passed (with conditions)
#B3: Limit the number of questions...of any given candidate	1	34	3	Failed
#B4: Clerking at RfA	–	–	–	Separate RfC
#C1: Expand discretionary range to 65%	74	30	71	Passed
#C2: Expand discretionary range to 60%	21	44	32	Failed
#C3: Expand discretionary range to 50%+1	0	27	0	Failed
#C4: Abolish the discretionary range completely	0	27	0	Failed
#D1: Upper limits on opposition	5	36	12	Failed