Wikipedia:2015 administrator election reform/Phase II/RfC

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Summary of results
Question Support Oppose % support Result
#A1: Advertise RfAs with a site banner 0 35 0 Failed
#A2: Advertise RfAs with a watchlist notice 85 12 88 Passed
#A3: Advertise RfAs on WP:CENT 41 7 85 Passed
#B1: Disallow threaded discussion on the main RfA page 16 46 26 Failed
#B2: Limit the number of questions...by any individual editor 82 24 77 Passed (with conditions)
#B3: Limit the number of questions...of any given candidate 1 34 3 Failed
#B4: Clerking at RfA Separate RfC
#C1: Expand discretionary range to 65% 74 30 71 Passed
#C2: Expand discretionary range to 60% 21 44 32 Failed
#C3: Expand discretionary range to 50%+1 0 27 0 Failed
#C4: Abolish the discretionary range completely 0 27 0 Failed
#D1: Upper limits on opposition 5 36 12 Failed