Wikipedia:Administrators against kitten abuse

This page contains material that is kept because it is considered humorous. Such material is not meant to be taken seriously.

We, the undersigned administrators of Wikipedia, pledge never to use our administrator powers to abuse kittens.

Note: we now have a userbox. For teh kittiez, of course. - Tbsdy (formerly Ta bu shi da yu) ^talk 00:55, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"Userbox"? Shouldn't that be a "litterbox"?? (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 15:32, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

1. Tbsdy (formerly Ta bu shi da yu) ^talk 05:47, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
2. --Versageek 15:02, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
3. I would rather club a baby seal! -- œ^™ 15:32, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
4. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 18:43, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
5. Although I truly do wish mine would stop vomiting hairballs into my electronic equipment; I've lost 2 DVRs and a wireless router that way. GJC 22:41, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
6. Absolutely. Well for the time being at least, though I wouldn't rule out blocking one. I can see the need for this page though as User:Kitten of Annoyance is by no means the only kitten blocked by a wikipedia admin. But in any event that thing I did with the string and the mouse stuffed with catnip? - No admin powers were involved. ϢereSpielChequers 00:16, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
7. All activities involving kittens on Wikipedia should be done with their consent as part of a loving relationship. Fences&Windows 12:12, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
8. Do not poke the feline. She will kick your ass, then sit on your keyboard and groom herself. And you will have deserved it... –Black Falcon ^(talk) 05:51, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
9. I am also against kitten abuse. Facebook would ban you—and in that vein I then say: so should Wikipedia. Altanner1991 (talk) 06:48, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]