 | This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2010 October 8. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Clearly there is a consensus to keep. A differerent decision could only be justified if there was some overriding consideration warranting the exclusion or marginalisation of the keep !votes. An attempt to do so was made here, claiming that if a GNG pass could not be demonstrated, deletion was mandatory. That isn't the case. The GNG is a guideline that creates a presumption of notability. Unlike WP:V, the GNG is not a policy the failure of which results in automatic exclusion. The clear consensus here is that an article is warranted, GNG aside. As there are no policy reasons to delete (such as verifiability failures), the local consensus here must be upheld. Mkativerata (talk) 04:42, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]