The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. The consensus is that there is insufficient evidence of the notability of the package, and that the coverage provided is either not reliable or independent enough PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 23:01, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]