The result was no consensus. Star Mississippi 13:08, 15 September 2024 (UTC) I was asked to review my close by Habst and have done so. While I still see this as N/C, I'm going to expand on my close that it's more helpful for the future. We have a situation here where sourcing (non-English, offline) exists. While there is no need for sourcing to be in English, and its existence or a lack thereof has no bearing on notability for en wiki, it does make source assessment more challenging. We have Ljleppan uncertain about whether its sufficient, Alvaldi making a case that proximity of sourcing is non issue and a broader disagreement as to the independence of interviews. The latter is an issue that really needs meta discussion as it regularly comes up at AfDs and I don't think is resolved. Having re-read this twice in Habst's request, I still find myself in the same place. I would suggest that before anyone considers bringing this back to AfD that they spend the effort researching and accessing (ref exchange board, Finnish & Swedish speaking editors) sourcing to see if the state of the article can be improved. Star Mississippi 21:25, 15 September 2024 (UTC)