The result was no consensus. Numerically there were more keep !votes, however the evidence of WP:CANVASS, and the less in-depth nature of the arguments, meant they could not be weighted so heavily. However, even having made this adjustment, the discussion ultimately comes down to whether or not the coverage of the subject is WP:SIGCOV or not, and whether the BAFTA Scotland Audience Awards are a significant enough award or not, and on this there was no agreement. The equivocal nature of the discussion here was reflected even in the "~partial"
label used for the some of the sources by the nominator. The fact that there have only been keep !votes in the past week also makes this unlikely to pass.
If this is to be renominated, I suggest analysing the sources again and coming down decisively in the nomination one way or the other on whether they really do or do not support notability: "partial notability" is not something known to our PAGs. FOARP (talk) 22:22, 15 November 2024 (UTC)