Note: I strongly disagree with the content of the non-administrative closure, below. I agree that the result of the discussion is keep, but it is not for the reasons given. The consensus of the discussion is explicitly not that the subject passes GNG; the discussion of the sources is quite clear: there is considerable disagreement over how they are to be weighed. In the end, ANYBIO must carry the day: at least one acceptable source verifies the Murrow award, which is significant enough (that it is is not disputed). Drmies (talk) 22:17, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep (non-admin closure). The consensus is that, while the article may not meet each specification of WP:JOURNALIST, Mackenzie meets WP:GNG. At the end of the day, the Toronto Sun and Etobicoke Guardian articles are independent, reliable sources providing significant coverage of the article subject - ample evidence that the subject meets GNG. North of Eden (talk) 21:07, 2 August 2015 (UTC)