The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep as per the large improvements made after the few Delete !votes; to note, the nominator has changed his implicit Delete !vote to a Keep after said improvements. The idea of a rename has been brought forth, I recommend a RM to reach consensus on that particular issue if you feel it could be controversial enough not to do it outright. (non-admin closure) Salvidrim!18:49, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]