Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charlene McMann (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. There is a fair argument for the only claim to notability being the BLP1E issue of the conviction. But a) after an extended debate there is no consensus on this point; and b) this is essentially a replica of the preceding debate from last month. A "no consensus" result does not preclude a subsequent nomination, but please wait a credible amount of time in order for a new consensus to evolve. Otherwise we will be repeating this discussion, with the same result, ad nauseum. Euryalus (talk) 07:41, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]