This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2019 September 5. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2019 August 5. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
The result was delete. Ultimately this discussion boils down to the very simple question of whether there is sufficient independent coverage in reliable sources to warrant keeping the article. The two sources which were at the forefront of the discussion were the Nintendo Life and Super Play articles, which as User:FOARP and User:David Fuchs demonstrated, do not provide the level of coverage required to establish notability. The !votes in favour of keeping the article argued primarily that the lack of sources was not an issue (or rather, was to be expected) due to the age of the publication, citing the essay WP:NMAG. However, this essay does not trump the notability policy, which requires significant coverage in multiple, reliable independent sources. The consensus, as I interpret it, is that the few sources available do not represent this level of coverage, and consequently that the article does not – in its current state – meet the requirements for inclusion.Yunshui 雲水 08:15, 5 August 2019 (UTC)