The result was delete. Whether or not we keep or delete an article has nothing to do with the political bent of the subject, and everything to do with notability, as demonstrated by coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. As such I am entirely setting aside the many !votes here that do not examine evidence for notability at all, and are instead screeds about wokeness and conspiracies within Wikipedia. For the benefit of these !voters, I will note that I was unaware of this discussion until 30 minutes ago, when I found it among the deletion discussions requiring closure; and also that my personal preference is quite strongly for documenting completely any controversial academic work, rather than removing it. However, to do so we need evidence of notability, and there is clear consensus here that such evidence does not exist. If someone wishes to work on this in draftspace, I will gladly provide a copy in the understanding that a mainspace move will not be made without more sourcing than has been examined here. Vanamonde (Talk) 10:50, 26 August 2022 (UTC)