The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. The keep side seem to rely more on assertion then actual secondarty sources and these have not been provided despite a good discussion, The delete site argue on apolicy basis that GNG requires secondary sourcing to demonstrate notability and that this is essentially a synthesis. I find the delete argumenst are moe in accordance with policy but will be willing to undelete instantly if proper secondary sources can be found. SpartazHumbug!19:14, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]