The result was delete. The key problems with the "keep" arguments here is that they were overlong or were challenged by others, whereas the "delete" comments stood their ground. An alternative outcome was Sandstein's suggestion to merge, as that would be a compromise, but nobody else picked up on it. The article itself was not improved much during the scope of the AfD, which while not a required action, may have been more a worthwhile exercise than arguing over the article's scope and potential for improvement. In a nutshell, though, too many people think this article is unsalvageable and its quality of sourcing is just not good enough. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 12:44, 18 November 2017 (UTC)