The result was delete. I think the participants have gone to great lengths to review this article and its sourcing, both in the article and that brought into the discussion and I see a consensus to Delete. This is not a conspiracy here. Every day, around 100 articles are nominated for similar AFD discussions and, to be honest, most of them do not have this level of participation so I think this is a solid consensus. Doing "opposition research" on other editors will never cause anyone to switch to agreeing with you and is a form of casting aspersions. This discussion is about editors and what else they might have done but about this article and whether notability is demonstrated through good, reliable sources. I think the participants really gave the sourcs the benefit of the doubt but they just were not enough. This doesn't mean that there will never be an article on this subject, it's just that there won't be one right now. I recommend starting the next one in Draft space and relying of the judgment of the AFC reviewers who, though they might be critical, are trying to save draft creators the pain of having their articles nominated for one of these AFD discussions. Good luck on your next creation efforts. Liz Read! Talk! 22:55, 28 September 2024 (UTC)