The result was no consensus. Opinion is about evenly divided, and there's no clear policy-based answer either way: The level of detail at which we want to cover Donald Trump's peculiarities is effectively a matter of our collective editorial judgment, given that they are clearly covered by reliable sources. But there is consensus that, if kept, the article should be substantially trimmed, e.g. to include only entries that are discussed in reliable secondary sources. Sandstein 10:27, 8 March 2020 (UTC)