Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 July 27

< July 26 July 28 >
Guide to deletion

Purge server cache

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Withdrawn‎. jp×g🗯️ 03:00, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Snowflame

[edit]
Snowflame (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An incredibly obscure comics villain. He's had a bit of a spur of re-appearances recently, and his subject matter seems like it would be discussed a lot, but there really isn't much on him. Google News hits turn up only Valnet and unreliable sources, Scholar yields no hits except for one book source, and Google Books search yields only the same book source: https://www.google.com/books/edition/The_Legion_of_Regrettable_Supervillains/TUhmCwAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22Snowflame%22+-wikipedia&pg=PA245&printsec=frontcover

This book source is additionally entirely plot summary. There's no analysis, Reception, or really anything I can find that actually establishes the subject's notability. I'd be happy to withdraw this nom if anyone happens to stumble on anything I've missed, but this is just a genuinely obscure character with basically nothing to his name, and it at best a case of TOOSOON depending on how much Snowflame gets used going forward. This article is likely better off being redirected or merged into another article. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 20:01, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep (as page creator). I think that sites such as Vice, Gizmodo, HuffPost, and IGN (which are all cited in the article) provide enough coverage for the subject to pass WP:GNG. Di (they-them) (talk) 20:09, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Good catch on those. Being entirely honest, I missed them when I was going through the article, so I'm really sorry about missing those. Still, IGN doesn't seem to contribute to notability per being routine coverage of an ongoing television series, with Snowflame only mentioned as appearing in the series, and the Comicbook sources are primarily plot summary. The VICE, Gizmodo, and HuffPost pieces are all decent enough, but my problem is that there really isn't anything here worth splitting. All of them say the same thing: Snowflame was mildly offensive, and later got a webcomic series. Given the character's incredibly small amount of appearances, Snowflame can quite easily exist in the character list without even threatening undue weight, with only a sentence or two really needed to describe why the character was notable. The issue here isn't really notability, but moreso the fact that Snowflame doesn't really have enough content to really warrant a split off the wider character list. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 21:12, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The VALNET articles are the first several references; the non-VALNET ones are like the entire right-handed column, so if you just looked at the first few, VALNET is what you would see. I get what you're saying about this not being a big deal to merge to a character list, and I agree: it would be a fine article to editorially merge. This, however, is a process that would compel such a merge, and in my mind the standard of non-notability is not met such that the article should be force-merged. Propose it on the talk page and I wouldn't have noticed or cared. Jclemens (talk) 03:36, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You bring up a fair point that this is probably better fit for a merge discussion. I'll withdraw this nomination and open a merge discussion on the subject's talk page. Apologies about the inconvenience. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 02:12, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep VALNET sources aren't needed to demonstratae notability. HuffPo, Gizmodo, and IGN are just fine per RSP, so the VALNET sources aren't necessary to meet GNG. Comicbook.com is also not VALNET, doesn't have an RSP entry, and seems to have been used for similar articles without issue. While the nod to BEFORE is appreciated, reviewing the sources already referenced at time of nomination is important, too. Jclemens (talk) 20:34, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep: Sources like Vice, Gizmodo, HuffPost, and IGN covered Snowflame, which shows the character meets WP:GNG. I agree that the character is obscure. Yet, there is enough content to warrant a standalone article, even if it remains short.--AstridMitch (talk) 23:20, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Note to closer: see concerns at ANI that the AFD !votes by AstridMitch, now blocked, are LLM-aided. Abecedare (talk) 20:15, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Withdraw as nominator. I see there is some coverage I have overlooked, and that this discussion is better discussed in a merge discussion than at AfD. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 02:14, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete‎. Bishonen | tålk 05:56, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Arnold Namisi

[edit]
Arnold Namisi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails GNG. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 19:45, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz Read! Talk! 20:34, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Plaza de California

[edit]
AfDs for this article:
Plaza de California (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article appears to be original research in violation of WP:NOR and advocacy in violation of WP:NOT to the extent that it asserts that the unnamed fountain plaza at the end of Capitol Mall in Sacramento, California between the Jesse M. Unruh Building and the Stanley Mosk Building bears the name "Plaza de California". No reliable sources have been provided to that effect which actually describe the plaza as such in body text. The only two citations to books in the article which use the term Plaza de California are to a 2023 horror novel published by OtherLove Publishing, a small indie publisher whose address is a P.O. Box in Organ, New Mexico, population 323, and a 2024 nonfiction book about a "wedding march" in opposition to Governor Gavin Newsom's COVID-19 restrictions published by Histria Books, a small indie publisher whose address is a mail drop in a strip mall in North Las Vegas. Those are not exactly reliable sources in the sense of books about the history of Sacramento or the Capitol Mall.
The term is used in some articles cited in the article which appear to meet WP:RS, but again, never in the body text. Rather, the term was used exclusively in captions of photographs taken at Governor Gavin Newsom's second inauguration in January 2023. The reasonable inference is that someone at the inauguration (probably a PR flack trying to articulate ground rules for the news media) incorrectly referred to the plaza on Capitol Mall as such, and then the photographers blindly adopted that term when they submitted photo captions to their news services or newswires.
The article also cites a SDSU Web page about a Sacramento postcard, but the Web page dates from 2024 and the term is used only in the SDSU metadata for the postcard as expressly displayed on the web page. It is clearly possible that the archivist could have picked it up from the 2023 news coverage of Newsom's second inauguration. The postcard itself does not use the term.
None of the sources cited in the article in which the actual subject is the Capitol Mall or the plaza itself actually use the term Plaza de California to refer to the plaza.
A search on Google Books revealed that sources about the history of Sacramento usually refer to the "plaza" or "fountain plaza" on Capitol Mall, such as this 1987 book. They do not refer to the Plaza de California. The only context in which that phrase comes up in historical sources is with reference to the Panama–California Exposition, which did have a Plaza de California. This is consistent with my recollection as a lifelong California resident; I have read the Mercury News regularly for over thirty years and all major California newspapers for over twenty years. None of them have ever described the plaza in Sacramento at the end of Capitol Mall as the Plaza de California.
This appears to be a situation in which erroneous photo captions applied a nonexistent name to a plaza which traditionally had none, and then it spread from there. Wikipedia should not be amplifying such mistakes.
I raised this issue on the talk page six weeks ago but the user who created this article has failed to add reliable sources as requested.
It's time to delete this article, without prejudice to the right of anyone to re-create this article later if they can find reliable sources which show that the plaza has been historically and consistently referred to as the Plaza de California. Coolcaesar (talk) 19:23, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to Operations (magazine). Liz Read! Talk! 20:40, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Boardgamer

[edit]
The Boardgamer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I found no significant coverage for this defunct game magazine. SL93 (talk) 19:13, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Maybe redirect because the article is mostly unreferenced, and the one reference that does exist is an unreliable source. SL93 (talk) 22:35, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Depending on whatever else shows up in this AfD, that may be the reasonable outcome. I'm open to see what others can come up with, as I know we have plenty who are more accomplished board gaming source hunters than I am. Jclemens (talk) 23:00, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'd lean "delete" since I don't know how a self-published zine that relies entirely on itself for information about itself can be kept, but since there is a valid target I'll go with redirect. There's nothing in the article adequately sourced to merge. Dclemens1971 (talk) 03:18, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Author requested (G7) Whpq (talk) 13:43, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alexander Arundel

[edit]
Alexander Arundel (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

it is looking like promotion and copyvio + not notable. ----modern_primat ඞඞඞ TALK 18:46, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. A nomination has a better chance of being successful with a fuller and complete deletion rationale that demonstrates that sources have been evaluated and a BEFORE performed. Liz Read! Talk! 20:37, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sukki Singapora

[edit]
Sukki Singapora (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability issues. Thewikizoomer (talk) 18:08, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz Read! Talk! 20:41, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Greek war crimes

[edit]
Greek war crimes (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

the article serves no purpose. All sections already exist as articles. Furthermore, it is impossible to confirm the content of the sources. Delete D.S. Lioness (talk) 17:35, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure if this necessitates a deletion of the article, but it needs a lot of work to bring it up to standards. Insanityclown1 (talk) 22:16, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
...but you had already proposed for deletion 🤔 D.S. Lioness (talk) 01:46, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
And the person who removed the tag had a point in my opinion. Not really taking a stand either way at this point, just offering my two cents. Insanityclown1 (talk) 14:34, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, A clear case of POV and original research article. It is about the "war crimes of Greece" and half of it narrates events that occured before Greece as a country even existed. It arbitrarily lists some events as massacres of Greece against Turkey, despite not being known as such in historiography, as victims come from both sides. At parts it relies on sources that are either too old, primary, or unreliable nationalist Turkish sites. As the nom said, every notable event that is included in this article already has its own, well written/sourced article. Plus, there is already a list of massacres during the Greco-Turkish war, and also the article of Persecution of Muslims during the Ottoman contraction which already covers the same topics, but is more general. I don't think that to single one country out of all that can be warranted. This article seems to follow the example of German war crimes, Turkish war crimes, British war crimes, etc. however the creator forgot that these states have been major world empires that committed recognized genocides with deaths reaching up to millions; None of the events in which Greece participated was even close to having a similar impact, so as to warrant a separate, stand-alone article. Every country on earth has engaged in wars which had victims; if the threshold for creating such article was that low, then every country on earth would have a similar article. Piccco (talk) 22:27, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It is also worth noting that the creator (currently banned) has been caught multiple times promoting extreme fringe theories and Turkish nationalism in wikipedia, which, to me, further confirms the POV motives behind this article. Some editors were patient enough to compile a list of these incidents at ANI ("Persistent ethno-nationalistic disruption"). The comments made at their SPI might provide further insight into their behavior. Piccco (talk) 16:29, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: I think it's a reasonable point that there are already individual articles for specific massacres, and things done during different wars; I am not sure if it's always the case that a specific article on a nation's war crimes should be devolved to sections of individual articles about wars. More crucially, how far back do we need to go with this? Do we need to include, like, the siege of Melos? That was grotesquely heinous, and obviously an affront to modern international law; the Geneva Convention, Rome Statute, et cetera. Now this is a very old example, but I think there is a point at which we are going too far for the contemporary notion of a "war crime" to be applied in a way that makes any sense, and some of the stuff in this article is from 1770, which seems pretty bizarre to me. jp×g🗯️ 11:37, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete While Greece did commit violations of war laws, much like the 100+ countries around the globe. And much like the war crimes all these countries have committed, Greece's war crimes are already covered in their relevant articles neutrally, with reliable sources that were peer-viewed and verified, unlike this article which is nominated for deletion, which uses sources the wouldn't be verified, do not meet Wikipedia's reliability criteria, and whose creation is disproportionate to the size and notability of the subject: the War Crime articles we maintain in Wikipedia are about notable cases in which global powers and major empires are involved: German war crimes, Turkish war crimes, British war crimes, Russian war crimes; Greece is neither, and its war crimes were already adequately covered in the relevant articles, and thus, does not justify singling it out of the hundreds of small countries and creating a standalone war crime article just for it. This goes against Wikipedia's common rationale. What the creator of the article did, also is to accuse the Greek state for war crimes which were committed when the Greek state didn't even exist. Or in cases where Greece's government wasn't even functioning at the time. This shows a blatant case of POV-pushing agenda by the article's creator to shed a negative light against a particular country. Furthermore, the way the article is structured, gives me the impression that the goal here isn't really to inform the readers about the subject in a neutral way but to prove a point which is commonly used in modern Turkish politics which are characterized by the tight control of the Turkish government over the country's media, rampant far-right nationalism and populism, Islamist rhetoric, and an anti-Greek sentiment. The creator's history log doesn't help in building faith about their attention to Wikipedia's guidelines which are important when tackling such serious topics in Wikipedia: Their user contribitions have worrisome signs of WP:POV and WP:OR edits that lack verification and which constitute source manipulations. To me it seems clear that the article should be deleted and a warning to be given to the creator for the violation of Wikipedia's core content policies, which are verifiability, no original research, and neutral point of view. edit: the creator just got blocked [4] indefinitely due to violating Wikipedia's rules, therefore my recommendation for throwing a warning at them, is redundant at this point as they have already been warned before. --- ❖ SilentResident ❖ (talk ✉ | contribs ✎) 14:28, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as SYNTH and CFORK of content already in other articles which is just clumsily copy pasted into this one. There is no coverage in historiography that treats these events in unified manner, so the article is basically an original research synthesis of disparate events that is not reflected in the literature. Khirurg (talk) 23:30, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as per comments of fellow editors above. Demetrios1993 (talk) 17:10, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Article is incoherent, clumsy, and highly ultranationalistic. I agree with what was stated above. Blowwhite1 (talk) 20:43, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Owen× ☎ 16:38, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Adriano Bernardes

[edit]
Adriano Bernardes (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Former football player with 84 games, 71 at the semi-pro level, 13 in Switzerland's second-tier league. Sources are just roster listing sort of things. I don't think he meets WP:NSPORT. Here2rewrite (talk) 16:15, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz Read! Talk! 04:00, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

SMK Bukit Bandaraya

[edit]
AfDs for this article:
SMK Bukit Bandaraya (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article does not satisfy WP:GNG; no significant coverage on the school. N niyaz (talk) 12:06, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 12:31, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Herald (Benison) (talk) 15:59, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Owen× ☎ 16:36, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bonnie Holiday

[edit]
Bonnie Holiday (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails GNG and ENT. The claim to fame is that she appeared in a documentary about porn but isnt mentioned on the playbill for the film nor is she name checked in the Roger Ebert review of the film. Even if being un-named in a review and uncredited in the film counts, thats 1E territory. No objection to this being redirected to the film if deleted. Spartaz Humbug! 15:56, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:30, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete highly dependent on a Single source and per Oaktree and Alien333, there is no WP:RS available to search for notablity Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 00:00, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to Trinidad and Tobago#Other sports. Liz Read! Talk! 20:43, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Trinidad and Tobago national baseball team

[edit]
Trinidad and Tobago national baseball team (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I was unable to find any WP:SIGCOV covering this team to meet the WP:GNG or WP:NTEAM, with only a few Facebook posts appearing in my BEFORE. The team does not appear to be ranked by the WBSC from what I can tell. Let'srun (talk) 14:00, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Star Mississippi 14:06, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ESPN College Basketball broadcast teams

[edit]
AfDs for this article:
ESPN College Basketball broadcast teams (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject does not meet the WP:NLIST due to a lack of coverage regarding these broadcasting teams. While individual broadcasters might be notable and they are covered in ESPN College Basketball, the teams themselves don't receive the same type of coverage. Let'srun (talk) 13:54, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Star Mississippi 13:38, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of archaeological sites by continent and age

[edit]
List of archaeological sites by continent and age (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This list is too broad in scope to ever be usefully complete. There are tens of thousands of archaeological sites in the world and most are notable. The current entries are a small fraction of just those sites we have articles on. We already have a list of archaeological sites by country (which is also very broad and should be split) to help people navigate by geography, as well as categories trees for Category:Archaeological sites by continent and Category:Archaeological sites by period, various templates and overview articles, etc. – Joe (talk) 13:36, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was procedural close‎. The article creator draftified it to Draft:Muhammad Luqman. (non-admin closure) WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 17:04, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Muhammad Luqman

[edit]
AfDs for this article:
Muhammad Luqman (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Reviewed during NPP. A supposed prime minister of a tiny island, not meeting WP:GNG or WP:NPOL. Unsourced and no reliable sources were found online. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 11:49, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Will also need salting if the article is deleted. Has been repetitively created multiple times. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 11:52, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to The Ice Road#Sequel. Liz Read! Talk! 07:11, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Ice Road 2: Road to the Sky

[edit]
The Ice Road 2: Road to the Sky (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lacking significant coverage per WP:NFF, draftify until receives more BOVINEBOY2008 11:15, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz Read! Talk! 07:10, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Samuel Antálek

[edit]
Samuel Antálek (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Antálek played 90 minutes of professional football before being sent to lower leagues. I found nothing better than Teraz, a brief mention in squad list, but am not sure how reliable it is. Article fails WP:GNG without significant coverage overall. ⋆｡˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚｡⋆ 11:00, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure)‎ Geschichte (talk) 19:59, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Letters from a Killer

[edit]
Letters from a Killer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to List of Russian films of 2019. Liz Read! Talk! 07:09, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Happiness Is... Part 2

[edit]
Happiness Is... Part 2 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to Sedale Threatt#Personal life. Liz Read! Talk! 07:08, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sedale Threatt Jr. (basketball)

[edit]
Sedale Threatt Jr. (basketball) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NBASKETBALL - was created in 2017 with heavy promotional material. The subject played primarily in an Australian second tier semi-professional league. There are no secondary or independent sources available. The subject is also basically an Orphan with it's only link being his father's page at Sedale Threatt. DaHuzyBru (talk) 06:59, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Sources have been added so that the article now passes the general notability guideline. (non-admin closure) Aydoh8[contribs] 06:36, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yamaha RX-K / RX-King 135

[edit]
Yamaha RX-K / RX-King 135 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of meeting WP:NPRODUCT * Pppery * it has begun... 04:24, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 05:33, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: This article has been edited a lot since its nomination. An assessment of new sources would be welcome.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 04:59, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

*Keep - meets WP:NPRODUCT with ease. Google has begun compartmentalizing the internet and isolating us inside of our own borders; the only way to find sources nowadays is by using other search engines or VPNs.  Mr.choppers | ✎  16:52, 28 July 2024 (UTC) Sorry, was unaware that I did not need to vote again.  Mr.choppers | ✎  17:53, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 06:44, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Carll Goodpasture

[edit]
Carll Goodpasture (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I have been looking for third party references to support this article but can find none, especially on the exhibitions and grants and awards categories. In addition, there are no references, other than links to primary sources from the subject person. I believe this is not notable and falls under under WP:NOTPUBLICFIGURE / WP:PRIMARY, and may violate WP:BASIC / WP:PHOTOGRAPHER / WP:AUTO. Maybe, if no references apply, the subject could be inserted into a relevant American photographer article. Shotgunheist 💬 04:51, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 07:01, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lillebror Johansson

[edit]
Lillebror Johansson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:SPORTSCRIT. Only primary sources provided. LibStar (talk) 03:24, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Draftification doesn't make sense for someone who doesn't appear to have a path to notability within six months Star Mississippi 01:09, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Joe Kerr (retired firefighter)

[edit]
Joe Kerr (retired firefighter) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable political candidate. Of the 4 sources cited on the page, 2 are his own website and 1 is Ballotpedia. No in-depth news coverage and no claim to notability. Holding a mid-level position in a union and serving on a state board does not entitle someone to a Wikipedia page. Page creator seems to have a personal connection to Kerr, judging by the fact that they uploaded several pictures of him on Commons and tagged them as "own work." BottleOfChocolateMilk (talk) 02:42, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kkantisiri, do not move an article that is being discussed at an AFD discussion. Wait for its closure. Liz Read! Talk! 01:39, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, thank you for letting me know. Kkantisiri (talk) 01:59, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz Read! Talk! 06:42, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wayne Alberts

[edit]
Wayne Alberts (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The provided sources are mentions and stats pages. Nothing else is available in Google. Shinadamina (talk) 01:33, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎. Star Mississippi 01:04, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of 20th Century Fox films (1980–1989)

[edit]
List of 20th Century Fox films (1980–1989) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This doesn't meet WP:NLIST / WP:GNG. It has no assertion of notability or references. Boleyn (talk) 22:32, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There are several sibling lists for other decades, so the concept was clearly "split long list up into multiple sublists for convenience". If The Robe was from an earlier decade, thus, then it would simply belong in another decade's list. Bearcat (talk) 15:25, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:11, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 00:48, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Refer to Category:Lists of films by studio. Please note the navbox 20th Century Studios Films at the bottom of the page. This is part of larger lists. Since major (or even minor) film studios have such an enormous output of films over the years or decades, this is an acceptable method of listing films by studio. — Maile (talk) 12:49, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 11:40, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

G-Worldwide Entertainment

[edit]
AfDs for this article:
G-Worldwide Entertainment (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Again, this article is deceptively written, creating an initial impression that it meets the criteria of WP:NCORP unless scrutinized closely. Critically fails WP:ORGCRIT, There is not even a single source from the article or WP:BEFORE to establish any context of notability. Being a nominee of The Beatz Awards is not significant enough to make it presumptively notable. Over all, fails WP:GNG. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 22:14, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:12, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 00:47, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, agreed that this fails NORG. JoelleJay (talk) 01:50, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Star Mississippi 01:03, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Chuck Garcia

[edit]
Chuck Garcia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional page for non-notable engineer and public speaker. I couldn't find any reliable sources via Google News or Newsbank Database (wider and deeper than Google). Fails WP:ANYBIO, WP:NPROF, WP:AUTHOR. Cabrils (talk) 00:15, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Star Mississippi 01:01, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Manu Intiraymi

[edit]
Manu Intiraymi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not sure this person passes WP:NACTOR, mostly minor roles. Can't find any reliable sources discussing them apart from the cited nytimes source which isn't specifically about Intiraymi, but mentions him in passing in 3 paragraphs of a rather long piece about the state of the entertainment industry in LA in the late 1990s. Other sources I have been able to find are Star Trek fansites, which I wouldn't consider significant coverage. Hemiauchenia (talk) 00:08, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.