Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 September 9

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 23:18, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kim Jong-chol (footballer, born 1991) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article fails WP:GNG. Simione001 (talk) 23:53, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of North Korea-related deletion discussions. Simione001 (talk) 23:53, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Simione001 (talk) 23:53, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Simione001 (talk) 23:53, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 20:16, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me. GiantSnowman 20:20, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, no SIGCOV, the only source given appears to just be a registry, not suggesting notability either. Sincerely, Guessitsavis (she/they) (Talk) 11:11, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - very little here and nothing more seems to be out there. Chris1834 Talk 20:44, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 23:18, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kim Il-yong (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article fails WP:GNG. Simione001 (talk) 23:51, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of North Korea-related deletion discussions. Simione001 (talk) 23:51, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Simione001 (talk) 23:51, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Simione001 (talk) 23:51, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 20:16, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me. GiantSnowman 20:19, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete- No SIGCOV, only source is just a list/directory. No evidence of notability. Sincerely, Guessitsavis (she/they) (Talk) 11:15, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - The article writer doesn't even seem to know if the 2 appearances listed are the only ones. Chris1834 Talk 20:43, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to Cameroon–Russia relations. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:25, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Embassy of Cameroon, Moscow (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article merely confirms its address. Does not meet WP:ORG. LibStar (talk) 23:49, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bilateral relations, Cameroon, and Russia. LibStar (talk) 23:49, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Another typical embassy "article"/directory listing that fails WP:GNG. AusLondonder (talk) 22:33, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Cameroon-Russia relations as AtD. Fails WP:GNG test for standalone page. Dclemens1971 (talk) 20:54, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:52, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Habben Michael (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The page is a mixture of unsourced BLP information and promotion. It was created in 2013 by an editor who only edited subjects linked to Teriy Keys/Smurfie Syco and was eventually blocked for a legal threat. I have searched online and not found any reliable sources: the online sources in the article are mostly dead. TSventon (talk) 16:18, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Women, Television, Advertising, Fashion, Ethiopia, Kenya, and England. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 16:23, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Unsure. As a singer, she’s probably not notable. As a model or designer, it’s arguable. In any case, searches online don’t show a lot of reliable sources. Bearian (talk) 01:45, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bearian is/was she a singer? That is not mentioned in the article. Did you find any independent sources? I have looked again at the sources: three are not independent, the archived copy of the "Europa Star" article does not mention her, which leaves New York (magazine), which is inaccessible and not enough on its own. Oddly the article history shows the author trying to delete the article in 2015 due to "request from persons legal team" before being blocked for a legal threat. TSventon (talk) 11:30, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If I chime in early in the AfD process, and it’s not a clear delete, and I’ve done at least some due diligence, then I usually just comment and ask questions. Let me think about this one. Bearian (talk) 11:54, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Continuing with my online searches, which I’m sure you have already done, I see that she has an album on sale at Amazon, Spotify, Pandora, and other websites; she also has videos on YouTube. She registered her company, ROAD, in the UK. That’s about it; pages of Google hits are not reliable sources. I’m leaning now towards delete for lack of significant coverage in reliable sources. Bearian (talk) 14:15, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:21, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: I do see various streaming sites, but nothing related to modelling. I don't see any kind of reliable sourcing we can use for an article. I'm not even sure the sources now in the article are helpful... Oaktree b (talk) 23:52, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to 2024 World Series of Poker. as an ATD. The proposed Merge target article now exists as a Redirect due to its own AFD so this is the suggestion that still is viable. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:33, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Peter Park (poker player) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable person, no WP:SIGCOV. Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 17:31, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete no significant coverages added. Need to add more sources. Xegma(talk) 17:35, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

More sources added + revised. PsychoticIncall (talk) 14:03, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Games, and California. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:17, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge with Frank Funaro (poker player). The two tournaments mentioned in this article is basically the same as the one in the other article (Funaro) but lower level variants (sharing the same structure and format). PsychoticIncall (talk) 13:34, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting to consider Merge possibility.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:19, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom or redirect to 2024 World Series of Poker. He does qualify under the WP:POKER notability essay by winning a WSOP event, but that predates the proliferation of events at the WSOP (over 100 in 2024) and is only an essay. Why would you merge to an unrelated player? Clarityfiend (talk) 07:48, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What I propose is the creation of a new article which covers the $10K version of the tournament listed in the article about Funaro but also who subsections the lower buy-in version of the tournament in this article. This is if the $10K buy-in event is deemed notable as the new article will essentially be about that tournament. PsychoticIncall (talk) 09:32, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to 2024 World Series of Poker. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:56, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Frank Funaro (poker player) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable person, lacking WP:SIGCOV outside specialist poker websites. Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 17:36, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Games, and New Jersey. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:23, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:18, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom or redirect to 2024 World Series of Poker (where the significantly larger of his two WSOP wins took place). Same rationale as my Peter Park !vote. Clarityfiend (talk) 07:54, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to TV JOJ. ✗plicit 00:37, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

JOJ WAU (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Probably not notable. I could only find this: [1], [2], [3]. This probably does not constitute significant coverage. Janhrach (talk) 17:27, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Slovakia. Janhrach (talk) 17:27, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to TV JOJ. ⋆｡˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚｡⋆ 10:58, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  I agree with redirecting. Even though these are sister channels, TV JOJ is the primary one, and its article provides some information that may be of interest to ones looking up JOJ WAU. Janhrach (talk) 17:50, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I am not sure about the merits of the proposed redirect as the article lists that target page (TV JOJ) as the sister station to this one. Any additional thoughts?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Malinaccier (talk) 19:11, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:13, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:30, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

SEFF Binghamton: Student Experimental Film Festival in Binghamton (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Student film festival that doesn't appear to meet WP:GNG or WP:EVENTCRIT. The only coverage I can find comes from student newspapers or non-independent sources. Orphaned for over a decade, not a likely search term. hinnk (talk) 22:25, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and New York. hinnk (talk) 22:41, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:26, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting, already PROD'd so Soft Deletion is not an option.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:13, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. I admit I did not attempt an exhaustive search, but I didn't find any hints that suggested there'd be anything else. Based on its age I did expect to find at least a passing mention somewhere that wasn't a student paper or university website, but nothing. -- asilvering (talk) 16:55, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Fails WP:GNG. Coverage limited to WP:RSSM; not finding anything else. Dclemens1971 (talk) 20:52, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 11:07, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

South Africa women's national under-18 softball team (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No independent, third party coverage uncovered for this subject to meet the WP:NTEAM or WP:GNG. The only sources in the article now are primary. Let'srun (talk) 23:50, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Softball, and South Africa. Let'srun (talk) 23:50, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete wiyh prejudice. Usual OR/unreliable sourced crud from Laura Hale. SerialNumber54129 23:59, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. Already at AFD (see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Singapore women's junior national softball team) so not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:58, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:11, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete – Fails in WP:GNG. Svartner (talk) 09:58, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to Chamillionaire#2008–2010: Final Mixtape Messiah, Venom, and Major Pain. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:36, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Main Event (Chamillionaire song) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Sources are to non third-party sources or places where the song is available for streaming. Never charted, cannot find sources, fails WP:NMUSIC Roasted (talk) 22:26, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Roasted (talk) 22:26, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Chamillionaire#2008–2010: Final Mixtape Messiah, Venom, and Major Pain per nomination. Found no additional coverage/notability myself. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 01:19, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:37, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2015–16 Hapoel Tel Aviv F.C. season (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article without any type of notoriety or references Alon9393 (talk) 21:34, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 September 9. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 21:57, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football and Israel. Shellwood (talk) 22:48, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. No content, nothing worth keeping. Geschichte (talk) 23:10, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep I am going to have a go a fixing up, they are a big club. If people decide to delete, then please move to my sandbox. Govvy (talk) 12:05, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 20:16, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Drafify - per Govvy, one for improvement out of mainspace. GiantSnowman 20:19, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Draftify – Per above. Svartner (talk) 23:38, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, has been worked on and, while not done, now looks like a normal season article. Geschichte (talk) 07:23, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Another article wrongly sent to AFD as it needs improvement, not deletion. Props on Govvy for making major improvements. --SuperJew (talk) 20:29, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:39, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Irakli Bagration-Imeretinsky (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I think it’s now pretty well established at AfD that we don’t keep articles on members of pretend monarchies that haven’t existed for centuries. Mccapra (talk) 21:52, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Royalty and nobility and Georgia (country). Mccapra (talk) 21:52, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Judging from the article, he's done nothing notable. It's the family that's notable not the person. Celia Homeford (talk) 10:15, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Draftify‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:41, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2015–16 Maccabi Petah Tikva F.C. season (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

In the intro he talks about a football team then it becomes empty and irrelevant Alon9393 (talk) 21:04, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football and Israel. Shellwood (talk) 21:11, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 September 9. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 21:19, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment Article can easily be fixed up if wanted, there are sources for transfers and matches for the club. Israel does have good news coverage for Premier League seasons there. So you can easily build an article if you want, GNG wouldn't be an issue. I have nothing against this being delete either. It's down to what people want to do with the article. Regards. Govvy (talk) 21:32, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment. At best, this should be draftified. It can be fixed, but not much is lost if it's deleted. Geschichte (talk) 23:09, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 20:16, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Drafify - per Govvy, one for improvement out of mainspace. GiantSnowman 20:19, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Draftify – Per above. Svartner (talk) 23:37, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment Umm, @GiantSnowman: Just to let you know, I wasn't planning on working on this article, just the other (Hapoel Tel Aviv) article. Govvy (talk) 20:57, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  That's noted, I still think it should be draftified to give someone the chance. GiantSnowman 21:00, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Draftify article needs improving not deleting, however it needs major improvement so should be done in draftspace. --SuperJew (talk) 20:26, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to American Football Ireland#Defunct teams. Owen× ☎ 21:10, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Belfast Bulls (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I couldn't establish that this meets WP:NSPORTS / WP:GNG. Boleyn (talk) 20:42, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to American_Football_Ireland#Defunct_teams. As an WP:ATD-R. And per outcome of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UCD American Football. Or, failing that, simply delete. (The only three sources I can find, which cover this short-lived amateur sports club, have been added to the article. Being this, this, and this. All examples of less-than-independent coverage and mostly trivial-passing-mentions. Nothing which establishes independent notability. The only reason for advocating a redirect, as an ATD, is because of this AfD outcome. Whatever the case, a standalone title cannot be justified on the basis of the sources. Which do not establish independent notability.) Guliolopez (talk) 23:42, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. Guliolopez (talk) 23:53, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. Guliolopez (talk) 23:53, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Northern Ireland. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:58, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to American_Football_Ireland#Defunct_teams: Unable to uncover any WP:SIGCOV here to help this subject meet the WP:GNG. Redirect as a WP:ATD. Let'srun (talk) 13:51, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Owen× ☎ 21:10, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CAF Cepia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per discussion on the talk page (Talk:CAF Cepia), editors have asserted that the existence of a CAF Cepia or CAF Sepia model is not verifiable as of when this article was created in April of 2020. Searching online, I was only able to find a single Russian publication referring to a model by this name ([4]), and it dates to 2 years later in addition to otherwise being of unclear reliability and leaving some uncertainty as to the "correct" spelling given the high likelihood of confusion when transliterating s, c, r and p between Cyrillic, Latin and Turkish. Available evidence would appear to suggest that, irrespective of whether Turkish State Railways has bought trains manufactured by CAF, none of them are known as Sepia or Cepia and thus there should be neither a redirect nor an article at this title. A WP:BLAR was essentially challenged at an RfD discussion, with that discussion recommending it be sent to AfD. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 20:05, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation, Spain, and Turkey. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 20:05, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• delete per nom. None of the sources indicate CAF ever marketing the trains under that name. Nyamo Kurosawa (talk) 22:45, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above. XtraJovial (talk • contribs) 14:28, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete While my default would be to recommend a redirect or merge for a train model that isn't notable on its own merits, in this case it has been pretty conclusively shown the name itself is not in use. Between Renfe Class 120 / 121 and TCDD HT65000, we aren't losing anything by deleting this. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 21:16, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:55, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dorell Anthony (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD, article about a non-notable actor and filmmaker. Don't it satisfies criteria for WP:NACTOR or WP:GNG, possible WP:COI. Jamiebuba (talk) 20:04, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Actors and filmmakers, and United States of America. Jamiebuba (talk) 20:04, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: I don't find much of anything for coverage, one article confirming the person joined Days of our Lives [5], but that's not enough for build an article or to prove notability. What's used now in the article isn't helpful, imdb and a local newspaper. Oaktree b (talk) 01:05, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television, New York, and Texas. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:28, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: Meets WP:CREATIVE with at least one very notable production to which his contribution was essential. -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 08:48, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete There is the one good article but in a local paper. He did apparently write and produce a series (Pride: The Series), but that article has even fewer references so I suspect it won't be deemed notable. Even checking the fan sites and IMDB there isn't much (if any) engagement. Other than that he has had what seem to be minor roles in various soap operas and not terribly visible TV series. Lamona (talk) 02:27, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:13, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete lack of WP:SIGCOV need more sources. Xegma(talk) 19:21, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. The views supporting keeping the page are more persuasive and well-argued, and outweigh those suggesting deletion. (non-admin closure) The editing spirit (talk) 18:11, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Linxea (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unlikely to be notable: its a brokerage, that is only relevant in France, and doesn't make any claims for notability. Sadads (talk) 20:04, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and France. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:13, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Does not meet NCORP — MaxnaCarta  ( 💬 • 📝 ) 23:29, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:27, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep French sources are notable and reliable enough to meet NCORP. The page could be shortened, though. --美しい歌 (talk) 10:40, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:12, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep -- a bare minimum of reliable sources is provided; the entity is generally notable. French media covers it pretty well and in depth. --Loewstisch (talk) 09:42, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep as sources are mainly good, for instance, the Business Immo, national newspaper La Tribune, Idéal Investisseur and L'Argus de l'assurance provide good broad coverage on the insurance firm with review, critics and not trivial and reliable overview. --Moarnighar (talk) 11:06, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment. Well, I agree there's mention in national newspapers, but... Sadads is right, there's really not much of a notability claim here. -- asilvering (talk) 17:50, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:37, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Resoomer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Has heavy coverage in industry press release type venues, but doesn't make a case for lasting notability, looks like SEO or COI editing. Sadads (talk) 20:09, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:14, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:26, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:12, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment I'll show my bias here, but this article, and others by the same editor, have plenty of sources in French (and some in Spanish) but I find none in English. I know that in en.wp we are not limited to English language sources, but if a topic has no relevance to an English-speaking audience then I do not see the *informational* value in including it. (I understand the desire on the part of businesses to get into en.wp but I'm not terribly sympathetic to that motive.) Using the logic of this article, we would import every article from every wiki into en.wp, but I don't think that provides the best service to en.wp users. I also agree about the possible COI but have no idea what to do about it. Lamona (talk) 02:40, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Like Lamona, I don't see the encyclopedic value here. If this had gone through AfC I suspect the reviewer would have declined it as promo. I think we should just delete it. -- asilvering (talk) 04:12, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:30, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nutan (Nepalese actor) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Deleted in January as Nutan (actor). Still doesn't seem to meet WP:NACTOR. jlwoodwa (talk) 19:23, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Nepal. jlwoodwa (talk) 19:23, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As the person who accepted this article, initially I thought he might meet the general notability guideline, but now looking back, yeah, he doesn't. Delete. OhHaiMark (talk) 12:29, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Search about him on Google, YouTube and other websites. I think he meets the general notability guideline. Most of his articles are in Nepalese language, so you might be thinking that way. Thanks! 111.119.49.66 (talk) 14:17, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Not eligible for soft deletion, so relisting to come to clearer consensus to delete the article.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Malinaccier (talk) 20:35, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:00, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Owen× ☎ 20:59, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Klaus Boesch (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:SIGCOV, WP:NARTIST. No indication of significance. Promo puff piece article. scope_creep^Talk 18:39, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists and Austria. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:59, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Dear WcQuiddith! Could you help me? What is wrong with the topics 'Artist' and 'Austria'? Klaus Boesch is an Austrian citizen and he is an artist, being successful in the asian and ME region mainly. Which does not make his artworks any worse than works of artists who are renowned in the US. The English Wikipedia should carry international measurements, because English is the language many Wiki users look up if they can't find anyting in their own language. Rich KB (talk) 12:40, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: Nothing for this artist, no listing in the Getty ULAN [6], there is a motorboat company and an athlete with the same name. Oaktree b (talk) 23:59, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Here [7] or [8], neither of which seem to be about this person. Oaktree b (talk) 00:00, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Sorry Oaktree, I have read the in the Getty ULAN website, it is a historical database. But Klaus Boesch is a still alive artist. You might find his profile on Artmajeur.com in example. I find it interesting, that Wikipedia seems not to allow establishing novelties. Sandman is not in the Getty database, because Klaus Boesch has not achieved major success in USA. Also let me add, that the English Wikipedia should be open for a world-wide community and not be snippeted to American measurements only! Klaus Boesch's success happens in Japan and China. If it is important for you to be listed in the Getty ULAN - could you let me know how an artist can be listed there?

  The motorboat company from Switzerland and the athlete have nothing to do with Klaus Boesch. Rich KB (talk) 12:35, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I couldn't find anything either. scope_creep^Talk 13:55, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear all! Once again: my success is in ME, China and Japan. That's why you can't find me in the Getty ULAN and you can't find anything relevant online in the English world or particularly in the USA about Klaus Boesch.

I talked to a moderator I know and he said, I might upload information from non-commercial media and eventually mention the Beijing Design Week.

Unfortunately the lady who had been creating my article on Wiki just gave birth to her first baby and she is off duty therefore. So my question is: who can help me inserting some of that content to get a better proof for my live as an artist. If you can help me, I would appreciate. Klaus Boesch Rich KB (talk) 15:07, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: no reliable sourcing for the information presented. See source table below. This is a poorly created WP:PROMO. Claims by the subject of this article on this deletion discussion show conflict of interest. --WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 01:17, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Source assessment table:
Source	Independent?	Reliable?	Significant coverage?	Count source toward GNG?
https://us.blastingnews.com/lifestyle/2017/05/meet-the-sandman-artist-klaus-bosch-discusses-his-sandy-kinetic-art-001705043.html	?	?	interview	✘ No
11er Kartoffelspezialitäten & Nahrungsmittel aus Frastanz: [Translate to English:] Home - Wählen Sie Ihr persönliches 11er Erlebnis"	?	?	dead link	✘ No
https://www.freihof.com/	?	?	link to a page for a winery?	✘ No
https://www.hak-has.at/	?	?	Erlebe die Vielfalt!	✘ No
https://www.cleveland.com/rentals/plaindealer/2012/03/sand_art_is_a_beautiful_and_soothing_addition_to_apartment_decor.html			puff piece "Sand art is a beautiful and soothing addition to apartment decor"	✘ No
https://gruenekraft.com/pieper-werner-m-3680.html			home page for Werner Pieper. No mention of Klaus Boesch	✘ No
https://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bundesrealgymnasium_und_Bundesoberstufenrealgymnasium_Dornbirn-Schoren&oldid=240949431			link to German Wikipedia	✘ No
https://archive.shine.cn/feature/art-and-culture/Artist-builds-career-atop-shifting-sands/shdaily.shtml	?	?	interview	✘ No
https://web.archive.org/web/20021208170850/http://www.sandpicture.com:80/german/index4artwork.htm			index of the artist old German website	✘ No
https://natalie.mu/comic/gallery/news/231972/702793	?	?	advertisement for Sand Picture "Galaxy ZERO"	✘ No
www.nisseico.jp/view/item/000000001735	?	?	? throws up security warning	? Unknown
https://europeandesign.org/	?	?	page for the European design Awards with no mention of Klaus Boesch	✘ No
https://www.meer.com/agora-gallery			homepage fo gallery with no mention of Klaus Boesch	✘ No
https://kbthesandman.com/projects.php			artist's website	✘ No
https://goshopbeijing.com/china-central-mall-384.html			website for a shopping mall with no mention of Klaus Boeschf	✘ No
https://goshopshanghai.com/k11-art-mall-shanghai-2322.html#google_vignette			website for K11 Art Mall Shanghai	✘ No
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

• Delete - based on the source analysis by WomenArtistUpdates and an online BEFORE search. This promotionally toned autobiography is of an artist who does not meet WP's notability criteria for artists per WP:NARTIST, WP:GNG and WP:BASIC. Klaus (Rich KB), Wikipedia strongly discourages autobiographies because it's nearly impossible for a person to have a completely neutral, objective point of view about one's own self-importance, or as you put it, "success". Fame and success are not the same as encyclopedic notability on WP. This is not a reflection on you or your work, it's simply how the encyclopedia works. I suggest that you set up a personal artist website to promote your work. Netherzone (talk) 02:17, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Visual arts and Japan. Netherzone (talk) 03:42, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Dear Netherzone! WomenArtistUpdates just states 'no reliable sourcing'. Can we call that an analysis? It is just a vague statement not more, not less. It is correct that my team does not have a completely neutral and objective view. If the fame of my works is happening in language zones, which you cannot reach, because it is Chinese, Japanese or Arabic - does that justify your conclusions? If an artist is not renowned for his works in English language - is there no place in Wikipedia for such an artist? I had the impression, Wikipedia is a worldwide source without any language limits. But you guys proof different. It seems that your information is just based on what you can find in the English spoken internet. I know I should keep being polite, but sorry, this is a quite poor attitude and also a narrow minded world Wikipedia is reflecting. I have not heared any helpful hints or ideas of how I could improve my article in a way you would accept it. So - can we expect any help from your side? I would appreciate help a lot. Rich KB (talk) 16:19, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Owen× ☎ 20:55, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Constantine Spandagos (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NPROF. scope_creep^Talk 18:30, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Engineering, Environment, Greece, England, and New Hampshire. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:01, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete early-career academic with citation counts not yet at the level needed for WP:PROF#C1. The article cites some mainstream media coverage of research he participated in (in the South China Morning Post and Irish Times) but his part in that work was apparently minor enough that he is not even name-dropped in those articles or in anything at all in Google News. —David Eppstein (talk) 00:04, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  All the mainstream media articles cited in this article are dedicated to research for which the academic had the leading role. There is no reference to research he simply participated in. The ScienceTrends article is fully dedicated to the academic's PhD thesis, and his name is mentioned in the article. The GreenQueen article is fully dedicated to a research paper of which the academic is the lead author, and his name is mentioned as well. The research covered in South China Morning Post also concerns a paper of which the academic is the lead author. His name is mentioned there too, and it seems that he had been invited to speak to the reporter/author of the article as an recognized expert in his field, as some of his quotes are used directly in the article. The only media article cited in this Wikipedia page that does not mention the academic's name directly is the Irish Times one. However, even that article is fully dedicated to a research paper to which the academic is the lead author. Therefore, no media source cited in this Wikipedia article covers work where the academic's part was minor.

  In terms of notability, I personally find it important that the academic's work is mentioned on these media articles, because these articles all come from independent sources. It doesn't seem that any of these sources belong to any of the organizations the academic has/had any affiliation with (unless I am wrong). For me, this shows that somebody's research work has impact and notability. Also, all these media are considered mainstream (I contrast this to other Wikipedia articles about academics, which cite various media covering the academics' work, but these media are often part of the university the academics are working in). Perhaps GreenQueen is the least known medium in countries outside Asia, but it is one of the most visited sustainability media in Asia, with 20+ million monthly digital impressions. Wikiuser852 (talk) 07:58, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Notability not remotely attained. Why on earth was this premature BLP created? Xxanthippe (talk) 00:24, 10 September 2024 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ^Complex/_Rational 19:14, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dara Greaney (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet WP:GNG. Cited sources routinely mention him as CEO, but none of them go in detail and mostly are about the company, BuyAutoParts.com. Gheus (talk) 18:22, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and California. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:01, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I found one interview with him, and not in what I would call a major source. No source predominantly about him, and none of the sources in the article would support BLP. There are some sources about his companies but almost all in local, promotional business sites. I don't think that either he nor his companies meet GNG. Lamona (talk) 02:57, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. The sourcing is laughable: LinkedIn, local business journal, and PR puffery. Bearian (talk) 01:47, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ^Complex/_Rational 19:14, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Randall Rossilli Jr. (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The claim of notability as a media entrepreneur is weak and lacks the in-depth reliable and verifiable sources required to back up the claim. Recording songs for release on iTunes is an even weaker claim of notability, not does his work as a teacher reach any notability standard. I was unable to find any meaningful in-depth coverage for him in a Google search. Alansohn (talk) 18:18, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians, Film, and New Jersey. Alansohn (talk) 18:18, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Businesspeople, Journalism, and Television. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:03, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Notability not found, Xxanthippe (talk) 22:27, 9 September 2024 (UTC).[reply]
• Delete – He does not have enough news coverage. 3 references were Staff directories. I removed them.Mysecretgarden (talk) 06:03, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. I note that regional Emmys are given out like participation trophies; they’re not major awards. Also, producers are run if the mill. Bearian (talk) 01:45, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Owen× ☎ 20:54, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Zahrisaurus (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Yet another Malkani dinosaur. References are exclusively predatory journals. This is not a real dinosaur, or even a notable fake one. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 17:59, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I notice it was previously "soft" deleted, potentially making this eligible for WP:CSD#G4? Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 18:00, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Animal, Organisms, and Pakistan. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:01, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support, though perhaps in future creating a page similar to List of informally named dinosaurs would be useful as a place to consolidate this information without making standalone articles (see other Malkani taxa such as Balochisaurus are entries on the page). IJReid ^{{{T - C - D - R}}} 19:00, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. This article is pointless. Lythronaxargestes (talk | contribs) 19:29, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Validity not supported by reliable journal articles. There is no point in recognizing a taxonomic name originating from a predatory journal anywhere on Wikipedia. PrimalMustelid (talk) 14:33, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. predatory journals are not acceptable as refs. 202.47.50.250 (talk) 04:24, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. (non-admin closure) Xegma(talk) 13:32, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

River Lyvennet (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lack of sources. Xegma(talk) 17:41, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and England. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:57, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• I've added a source about the walk though its from the national park so may not be secondary. Crouch, Swale (talk) 18:08, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I don't see an encyclopedic development other than an informative pamphlet. Alon9393 (talk) 21:26, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Wikipedia:NATFEAT as named natural feature. Wikipedia:BEFORE, bad nom: no refs is not a reason for deletion, especially if they are available.Djflem (talk) 15:41, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. It doesn't appear that any WP:BEFORE was done. There are plenty of sources out there, and I will add some of them, including a BBC article. Clarityfiend (talk) 08:12, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. asilvering (talk) 17:52, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Adebayo Adeleke (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:SIGCOV, WP:BIO. Refs are primary on a WP:BLP made up of interviews, profiles, podcasts. No indication of significance. scope_creep^Talk 17:37, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Military, Nigeria, and United States of America. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:58, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Seems like a person who does good work, but I'm not seeing notability from the lack of sources. [9] or [10], primary sourcing or an interview, which don't contribute to notability. Oaktree b (talk) 00:03, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: I ain’t making a !vote yet but this source says he’s a Fellow of the Royal Society of Arts. If this is truly true, doesn’t this meet the NPROF#3? Best, Reading Beans 07:52, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No. Its doesn't add nothing. Its not an elected postion, you just send in your money and your a member. Now, if it was something like a Fellow of the Royal Society, that would be completely different. scope_creep^Talk 11:21, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Not much in terms of SIGCOV from reliable sources. Reads like a promotional CV. Best, GPL93 (talk) 22:13, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Per nom. Best, Reading Beans 08:24, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: While this individual may be notable. The article seems more tailored like a resumé and reads promotional to me. Mevoelo (talk) 14:15, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Content can be Merged, I suggest proposing this editing decision on the article talk page. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:33, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Theory of Interstellar Trade (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nonnotable speculative article; the sole sources about are the author and a single commentary in a blog. The author himself confesses that it was a tongue-in-cheek endeavor. --Altenmann >talk 17:02, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep. I dunno, it's been cited 65 times, which seems high for a tongue-in-cheek joke article! It's been discussed quite a lot in books as well, in addition to Tyler Cowen's commentary that's already in the article. I think it's arguable that this article could be treated as notable under WP:BKCRIT #5, with an author "so historically significant that any of the author's written works may be considered notable. This does not simply mean that the book's author is notable by Wikipedia's standards; rather, the book's author is of exceptional significance and the author's life and body of written work would be a common subject of academic study." I could be convinced to redirect, since it's likely a valid search term, but I'm on keep for now. Dclemens1971 (talk) 17:34, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Economics and Spaceflight. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:59, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – I've found some decent coverage. In rough order of significance:

• An article in the Economist (archived)
• A section of a CBC business article
• A paragraph in a NYT opinion piece (archived)
• A paragraph in Coined: The Rich Life of Money and How Its History Has Shaped Us at Google Books
• A paragraph in Fake Physics: Spoofs, Hoaxes and Fictitious Science, p. 76, at Google Books
• A paragraph in Academia Obscura: The Hidden Silly Side of Higher Education at Google Books
• A paragraph in The Cosmos Economy: The Industrialization of Space, p. 193, at Google Books
• A parenthetical aside in Cosmology for the Curious, p. 58, at Google Books
• A footnote in What Led Eminent Economists to Become Economists? 
• A mention in Earth Economics: An Introduction, p. 4, at Google Books
• A mention in The Space Value of Money: Rethinking Finance Beyond Risk & Time at Google Books
• A mention in Asteroids: How Love, Fear, and Greed Will Determine Our Future in Space at Google Books
• An excerpt in Issues in General Economic Research and Application: 2011 Edition, p. 592, at Google Books

jlwoodwa (talk) 18:11, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge to Paul Krugman although it is probably necessary to create a new category there for his less academic articles. I note that 65 cites is not a huge amount, and there seems to be only one source that is substantially about this "theory". {$DEITY} willing we will some day have enough content for an article "Economic Satires on a Science Fiction Theme." Lamona (talk) 03:18, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  I think the Economist and CBC articles that Jlwoodwa surfaced are sufficient WP:SIGCOV to constitute a WP:GNG pass on its own. Dclemens1971 (talk) 01:57, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  The Economist is a substantial and reliable source. The CBC article is reliable but not substantial - it's a section but not enough of one to meet GNG, IMO. Counting, it adds up to 5 sentences of which 2 are quotes. That same section covers the work of economist Zachary Feinstein, reducing it further. Lamona (talk) 03:50, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Do we really need to merge this? Paul Krugman is a pretty extensive article and I don't see an obvious place for this to fit. -- asilvering (talk) 17:54, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was withdrawn; speedy keep‎. Dclemens1971 (talk) 18:32, 9 September 2024 (UTC) (non-admin closure)[reply]

Address to the Nation (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is WP:SYNTH and thus fails WP:GNG by violating WP:NOR. The article cites no source describing the concept of an "address to the nation" or "national address" as a global phenomenon; instead, it describes specific examples in particular countries (relying primarily on WP:PRIMARYSOURCES) and strings them together in what is definitionally original research. Dclemens1971 (talk) 16:56, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events and Politics. Dclemens1971 (talk) 16:56, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep – I agree that we don't need an article about the topic of national addresses, but I think it could be converted to a reasonable list of national addresses. jlwoodwa (talk) 18:23, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's a reasonable outcome. I'll withdraw and move the article. Keep. Dclemens1971 (talk) 18:31, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 14:14, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cullen Sheehan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLP of a lobbyist, not properly referenced as passing inclusion criteria for lobbyists. The attempted notability claim here is that he had political consultancy roles, like campaign manager or chief of staff, before registering as a lobbyist, but those are completely unsourced for the purposes of turning them into notability claims, while his work as a lobbyist is referenced entirely to a single directory entry that isn't support for notability. Nothing stated here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to pass WP:GNG on third-party reliable source coverage in media about him and his work. Bearcat (talk) 14:14, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and United States of America. Bearcat (talk) 14:14, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. I did find [11] but again it is not an in-depth source about Sheehan. LizardJr8 (talk) 14:50, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Newspaper coverage has about as much as the comment above found [12], brief mentions but nothing for notability. I don't see anything else we can use for sourcing. Oaktree b (talk) 15:21, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: It's easy to find this person is/was a lobbyist as mentioned in the article. But as far as what he achieved in that capacity, just isn't available. — Maile (talk) 15:58, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Needs cleanup to stub level. Kellpb93ke (talk) 16:51, 9 September 2024 (UTC) — Kellpb93ke (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Please provide sources to support notability Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:01, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Minnesota-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:00, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Kablammo (talk) 16:24, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 14:08, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

James P. Covey (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLP of a diplomat and politician, not properly referenced as passing inclusion criteria for diplomats or politicians. The attempted notability claim here is that he was nominated for a subcabinet position but was never confirmed into the role by the senate, which is not "inherently" notable in and of itself -- the notability bar at WP:NPOL is holding a notable office, not just being nominated for one -- but the article says absolutely nothing else about his career up to that point to suggest any other basis for preexisting notability, and it's referenced 2/3 to primary sources that are not support for notability at all. And while there is one reliable source to a piece of media coverage, one of those isn't enough all by itself. Bearcat (talk) 14:02, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and United States of America. Bearcat (talk) 14:02, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Rather brief political career [13], then back into obscurity. I don't see enough sourcing to use for an article. Even the position held was a low-level one, for a brief period of time. Oaktree b (talk) 15:23, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Not notable. His diplomatic nomination never saw fruition, and no other information about him is available. — Maile (talk) 16:29, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep and convert to stub. If we can do it for Daniel Morcombe we can do it for this. Kellpb93ke (talk) 16:52, 9 September 2024 (UTC) — Kellpb93ke (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Note This editor has since been blocked for vandalism. Best, GPL93 (talk) 19:49, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Connecticut-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:04, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per Oaktree b. Best, GPL93 (talk) 19:49, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. He could’ve been a contender, but wasn’t. Now, if there were significant coverage in non-biased sources that showed his career either before or after his failed nomination, then it would be a different matter. Saying we did it for one guy but not another isn’t a good reason to keep. Bearian (talk) 01:53, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 13:37, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jean Bernard Djambou (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Minor Olympian with virtually no source coverage. Allan Nonymous (talk) 13:36, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Cycling and Cameroon. Allan Nonymous (talk) 13:36, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete lack of WP:SIGCOV need to add more sources. Xegma(talk) 13:49, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:51, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Fails WP:SPORTSCRIT and WP:NOLY. LibStar (talk) 11:23, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Clearly not notable. Marcus Markup (talk) 19:27, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:29, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Friends Communication (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I cannot find sufficient reliable news coverage independent of the topic here, per WP:CORP Loewstisch (talk) 10:39, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Loewstisch (talk) 10:39, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and West Bengal. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:50, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Draftify it for now. Xegma(talk) 14:05, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Malinaccier (talk) 13:26, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, I couldn't find any significant coverage in reliable sources, English or Bengali (ফ্রেন্ডস কমিউনিকেশন), just passing mentions in articles about their films. The same is true of the sources cited, it's WP:REFBOMB'd with 96 citations about the films, but just 13 of them actually make passing mention of the company, literally "produced by Friends Communication" in each case. Wikishovel (talk) 10:06, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 12:50, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oladipupo Olayinka (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I couldn't find any other sources talking about him. Only WP:PASSINGMENTION Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 12:50, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Nigeria. Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 12:51, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Tennis. Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 12:53, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Thank you for the Review Exceptionalmagic (talk) 13:00, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete need more sources. Xegma(talk) 13:09, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete No sportsman's notability. --Altenmann >talk 17:17, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Fails WP:SPORTCRIT, WP:GNG or WP:ANYBIO. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 23:10, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete— Obviously fails WP:GNG. No references to show notability. No significant awards or mentions. Being a table tennis player or a member of the police force does not mean notability. Mevoelo(talk) 14:36, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 12:46, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rick Brook (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. The only RS coverage is run of the mill high school sports coverage in local news outlets. Being " most successful boys basketball coach in the history of Sebring McKinley High School" certainly does not establish notability. GPL93 (talk) 12:28, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Basketball and Ohio. GPL93 (talk) 12:28, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Hall of fame might be notable with decent sourcing, but the lack of sources isn't helping. I don't find anything we can use, sources now in the article are primary/related to the sports teams. Oaktree b (talk) 15:25, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think any of them are notability-lending. One is the high school he attended, the high school where he coached, and one specific to Ohio high school basketball coaches by the Ohio basketball coaches association. Both high schools appear to have had and still have rather low enrollments. Best, GPL93 (talk) 16:20, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:51, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Newspapers.com seems to bring up a good deal of coverage in the Salem News, as well as this from The Plain Dealer. BeanieFan11 (talk) 16:22, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: The sourcing in the article appears to be all non-independent as they are linked to the school he coached for. What exists elsewhere is the hyper-local coverage which would be expected for anyone in this role, but that does not lend to the WP:GNG or WP:BIO being met. Let'srun (talk) 13:24, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 11:37, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Gurukripa Career Institute (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The institute is a coaching centre for the preparation of competitive exams, not an government approved educational establishment. It does not meet WP:NSCHOOL. See WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. Also several new SPAs are engaged in suspicious editing this page. They have even tried to manipulate the List of institutions of higher education in Rajasthan by creating a new section for "Coaching institutes" and adding this coaching centre, which is not an appropriate category. Charlie (talk) 11:12, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes. However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts: {{subst:spa|username}}; suspected canvassed users: {{subst:canvassed|username}}; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: {{subst:csm|username}} or {{subst:csp|username}}.

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, India, and Rajasthan. Charlie (talk) 11:12, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Fails WP:NCORP which schools must pass nowadays. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 11:19, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: I have spent some time removing promotional and repeated content. What's left doesn't meet NCORP (just routine reporting). Paul W (talk) 11:36, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

:*Keep: Yes, there was some promotional content in this article, but I believe deletion is not the solution. I have visited this institute, and many others visit it as well. However, there is no proper source that provides accurate information about this institute. Therefore, I think we should add correct and reliable information instead of deleting it. This way, it will help people find the right information about the institute, which has a large number of students. Every year, many students try to get information about this institute, but they struggle to find reliable and proper sources.

Sandeep Kumar Kajla (talk) 12:20, 9 September 2024 (UTC)Account blocked for abusing multiple accounts. PhilKnight (talk) 15:58, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If the students can't find any sources, and you can't find sources, that indicates this isn't a notable institution. Oaktree b (talk) 15:26, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

:* Keep : I think we should keep this article as it will reflect the truth of coaching industry.

Mike20008 (talk) 12:22, 9 September 2024 (UTC))Account blocked for abusing multiple accounts. PhilKnight (talk) 15:58, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

:* Keep: Deletion is not in order here. The article provides a good beginning for information on a major institute. With an update using credible and accurate data, we can do much better to serve the needs of interested individuals. Semsuineas.wiki (talk) 12:34, 9 September 2024 (UTC) [reply]

Charlie, I think you've read the List of Institutions of Higher Education in Rajasthan properly. At the top, some private engineering colleges are mentioned, and their pages have also been published. Therefore, I don't believe we can't add private institutes.

Mike20008 (talk) 12:43, 9 September 2024 (UTC)Account blocked for abusing multiple accounts. PhilKnight (talk) 15:58, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

:* Keep: Removing the article is not a solution. The institute is very important to a lot of students. By re-writing with known and verified information, we could offer a valuable page to those looking for correct information.

Maggidi (talk) 13:14, 9 September 2024 (UTC)Account blocked for abusing multiple accounts. PhilKnight (talk) 15:58, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

:@CharlieMehta, I do not want to get caught in this controversy but would like to say one thing that instead of deleting, everyone should try to improve, because even today there are many articles which are not correct and the recent information is also not updated, so more focus should be kept on improving. Let's all decide together whether to keep it or not @Maggidi, @Mike20008, @Paul W, @Semsuineas.wiki, @Skajlajjn1996, @Timtrent

Thanks Devidafrica.villager (talk) 14:20, 9 September 2024 (UTC)Account blocked for abusing multiple accounts. PhilKnight (talk) 15:58, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: Five accounts with less than 100 edits (three of which have less than 10) all commenting within an hour of each other saying the same thing. At the risk of stating the obvious, it seems there is some sock/meatpupperty going on in this discussion with the goal of WP:Bludgeoning. 🌸wasianpower🌸 (talk • contribs) 15:28, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:05, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Poor sources and per nom, page does not satisfy the notability guidelines for organizations. Fails WP:NSCHOOL. RangersRus (talk) 20:07, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete:per nom. R0paire-wiki (talk) 02:03, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 11:37, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thibault Duplessis (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BIO, WP:SIGCOV. No indication of signification found in the before. scope_creep^Talk 11:01, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Sportspeople, Software, and France. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 11:04, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete One gnews hit does not meet WP:BIO. Article mainly based on primary sources. LibStar (talk) 02:47, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete for lack of WP:SIGCOV, in accordance with LibStar. Also, having a single reliable source is equivalent to original research. Bearian (talk) 02:02, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. ✗plicit 11:37, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Edie Rodriguez (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable business woman. Article has been an orphan for 7 years, sources are all trade press puff. Golikom (talk) 10:28, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Women, Travel and tourism, New Jersey, and New York. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:56, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per the significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources. The subject passes Wikipedia:Notability (people)#Basic criteria, which says:

  People are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject.

  • If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability; trivial coverage of a subject by secondary sources is not usually sufficient to establish notability.

  Sources

  1. Golden, Fran (2015-01-15). "Cruise Exec Spotlight: Edie Rodriguez". Porthole Cruise Magazine. Archived from the original on 2024-09-10. Retrieved 2024-09-10.

     The article notes: "Edie Rodriguez (née Edie Bornstein), president and chief operating office of Los Angeles–based luxury line Crystal Cruises, is a 53-year-old Type-A personality who sleeps four hours a night, likes fast cars, and never met a Neiman Marcus she didn’t like. And she’s obsessed — with Rod Stewart. ... Travel got into her soul as a child growing up in New York, when she decided her quest was to see the world. But there was the slight issue that she had no money, she laughs. So she went to work as a travel consultant, relocated to…"

  2. Sampson, Hannah (2013-10-05). "Edie Bornstein to lead Crystal Cruises". Miami Herald. Archived from the original on 2024-09-10. Retrieved 2024-09-10.

     The article notes: "Edie Bornstein, who left Azamara on Sept. 30, will become president and chief operating officer of Los Angeles-based Crystal Cruises effective Oct. 16. She replaces Gregg Michel, whose resignation was announced Friday. Bornstein joined Azamara, the upscale two-ship brand owned by Royal Caribbean Cruises, in 2009. Before that, she was vice president of business development and strategic partnerships at Carnival Cruise Lines and also had stints at Cunard and Seabourn. Before working for cruise lines, she focused on the cruise industry at Amadeus, the global travel technology company."

  3. Herrera, Chabeli (2017-10-20). "You may not know of French line Ponant yet — but a Miami cruise expert plans to change that". Miami Herald. Archived from the original on 2024-09-10. Retrieved 2024-09-10.

     The article notes: "Rodriguez joined Crystal after holding several senior sales, marketing and business development positions at Royal Caribbean Cruises and Carnival Corporation. She served as Crystal's president and chief operating officer from 2013-14 before being promoted to president and CEO in 2015, when the cruise line was acquired by Genting Hong Kong."

  4. Herrera, Chabeli (2017-09-15). "Crystal Cruises' president and CEO Edie Rodriguez resigns". Miami Herald. Archived from the original on 2021-02-12. Retrieved 2024-09-10.

     The article notes: "Since Rodriguez took the helm as president and CEO, Crystal has launched two river vessels, with a third forthcoming, an expedition yacht, and an ultra luxury, private Boeing 777. The three brands, Crystal Yachts, Crystal River Cruises and Crystal Air, have been instrumental in growing Crystal’s footprint in the luxury travel market."

  5. Becken, Bill (Spring–Summer 2014). "The new face of Crystal Cruises". International Cruise & Ferry Review. No. 44. pp. 82–83. ISSN 0957-7696. EBSCOhost 113549718.

     The article notes: "Whether regaling travel agents at an elegant seaside resort in southeast Florida, or holding court for a retinue of luxury travel media aboard the Crystal Serenity on the West Coast in Los Angeles, Edie Bornstein, Crystal Cruises' new president and chief operating officer, is understandably busy. Appointed in October 2013, she previously served as SVP, sales and marketing for Azamara Club Cruises, based in Miami. There is a logical progression from Azamara's upmarket offering with its two, roughly 700-passenger ships, to Crystal's ultra-luxury brand, deploying two ships of around 1,000-passenger capacity. Consequently, even as a presidential newcomer at Crystal, Bornstein exudes the same confident manner and zeal as she was known for in her earlier career."

  6. Snyder, Benjamin (2016-01-21). "Meet the Only Woman to Lead a Luxury Cruise Line". Fortune. Archived from the original on 2024-09-10. Retrieved 2024-09-10.

     The article notes: "For Crystal Cruises CEO Edie Rodriguez, travel isn’t just a hobby—it’s a way of life. In fact, Rodriguez has traveled to nearly 200 countries so far. Chances are, she’s nowhere near finished. Since starting with the luxury cruise line in 2013, the travel industry veteran has been all business. Indeed, she’s been working to transform the line’s culture—and even the way people vacation, as Fortune recently reported. Rodriguez is building out the brand to not only include excursions by sea, but also by river on a yacht and even by airplane. And, as the only female CEO of a luxury cruise line, she’s also blazing a new path in industry where the top ranks are dominated by men. Rodriguez began her career as a travel consultant and has worked for Carnival Corporation, Royal Caribbean Cruises, and Azamara Club Cruises over the years."

  7. Less significant coverage:
     1. Sampson, Hannah (2019-09-21). "Christine Duffy named new Carnival Cruise Line president". Miami Herald. Archived from the original on 2019-09-21. Retrieved 2024-09-10.

        The article notes: "Late last year, Crystal Cruises chose Edie Rodriguez (then Edie Bornstein) as president and chief operating officer"

     2. Vora, Shivani (2015-10-13). "Why Crystal Cruises Is Adding a Plane and Submarine to Its Fleet". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 2024-09-10. Retrieved 2024-09-10.

        The article notes: "Crystal Cruises is on something of a tear. The Los Angeles-based luxury cruise line currently sails to all seven continents on itineraries ranging from five to 128 days, but the chief executive, Edie Rodriguez, 54, recently announced an aggressive expansion plan for its 25th anniversary this year. It started with her commissioning three new vessels to be built for Crystal's core fleet, bringing the total to five. ... Ms. Rodriguez has visited more than 75 countries through cruising."

     3. Kickham, Debbi K. (2014-09-20). "Cruising her way to the top: Edie Rodriguez". The Boston Globe. Archived from the original on 2024-09-10. Retrieved 2024-09-10.

        The article notes: "Edie Rodriguez is a type-A born-and-bred New Yorker and last year was made president and chief operating officer at Crystal Cruises. We checked in with her to see if her business life is all smooth sailing."

  There is sufficient coverage in reliable sources to allow Edie Rodriguez to pass Wikipedia:Notability#General notability guideline, which requires "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject".

  Cunard (talk) 11:14, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep, article is well sourced and I have de-orphanilzed it as well. Davidgoodheart (talk) 02:49, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per WP:HEY, although I would like all the sources found added to the article. She ran a major luxury travel business, and the coverage shows it. Bearian (talk) 01:59, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to University of the Philippines Diliman. ✗plicit 11:42, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

University of the Philippines College of Mass Communication (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP, WP:BRANCH. No indication of significance. scope_creep^Talk 10:21, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Article is about a degree-granting unit of the national university of the Philippines. Though I do admit that I haven't been able to flesh out the article yet, it seems hardly accurate to say that it has no indication of significance considering that it's about a part of the larger University of the Philippines Diliman but otherwise wouldn't fit on that page. Brly31415 (talk) 10:40, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Journalism, Schools, and Philippines. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:57, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment There is a several of these department articles that are essentially cut and paste article with the information lifted from the university websites resulting in a WP:PRIMARY sources that fails WP:SIRS. The Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/University of the Philippines College of Music was deleted and recreated and G4'd. They are nothing except UPE articles. scope_creep^Talk 09:13, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  The article has now been updated to include information unique solely to the article. I've addressed issues on both content and notability. It's no longer "essentially cut and paste." Brly31415 (talk) 17:04, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect - to the main article on the university. Generally, sub-schools of a university are not notable and there are no detailed sources to show otherwise. The independent secondary sources either aren't reliable, or simply discuss single events associated with the school rather than the school as a whole. 4.37.252.50 (talk) 20:48, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to University of the Philippines Diliman per IP user's argument. SBKSPP (talk) 01:38, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 11:41, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Matej Rehák (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Rehák played a total of 19 minutes at professional level before being sent to lower leagues, then disappeared. The only secondary source I found is SME but it's paywalled. ⋆｡˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚｡⋆ 10:12, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Slovakia. ⋆｡˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚｡⋆ 10:12, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, lack of achievements and corresponding lack of sources. Geschichte (talk) 22:34, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 20:16, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me. GiantSnowman 20:18, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete—Clear as day. Anwegmann (talk) 18:45, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. ✗plicit 11:41, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Technology Connections (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I still believe this fails SIGCOV and notability for the same reasons discussed in the last AfD discussion two months ago. StewdioMACK (talk) 09:55, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. StewdioMACK (talk) 09:55, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Technology and Illinois. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:58, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep enough independent sources with significant coverage to meet the bar for WP:GNG. If that would not be the case, Alec Watson meets WP:NAUTHOR anyway. PhotographyEdits (talk) 12:51, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Which sources do you consider to meet the bar for each of those paths? Sdkb ^talk 14:18, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Per the comment of DigitalIceAge. PhotographyEdits (talk) 17:43, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. This is getting tedious. We have significant coverage about the channel itself in multiple reliable sources: The Physics Teacher source is expressely about his channel, the Lifehacker source dedicates over 100 words about his channel, Jancovic 2023 is a published book that spends an entire page praising Watson's deducition skills. Almost all of the rest of the sources contain enough editoralizing about his channel to constitute sigcov of Technology Connections. Per WP:WEBCRIT it passes the bar. DigitalIceAge (talk) 16:20, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Enough good sources with enough sigcov to keep the article. This YouTuber has clearly made an inpact in the reliable sources to be notable enough for a page on enwiki. Melmann 08:50, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 11:40, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kashif Aslam (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable makeup artist. This was created after the deletion of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kashee's Beauty Salon by the same user. Fails WP:GNG. Gheus (talk) 09:37, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Pakistan. Shellwood (talk) 09:54, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Fails GNG and none of the awards he received are significant. --— Saqib (talk I contribs) 13:11, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete: Delete as per nom. Fails WP:GNG Wikibear47 (talk) 13:21, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above. WP:RSNOI applies to most of Indian sources cited. 202.47.50.250 (talk) 04:25, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 11:39, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]