The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. There are a couple of observations (discounting the fact that I closeda similar debate as "keep" earlier today). First of all, procedural keeps have been ignored; every article should be debated and judged on its own merits. Second, any votes that make no judgement on the article but on the way this deletion discussion has been opened (from an admin point of view, there has been absolutely no wrong-doing with the method) have been ignored. There has been debate on the referencing, and whether the sourcing is enough to pass WP:N; some put forward as substantial references are not reliable (busesonscreen and londonbusesbyadam). Without these, there is a lack of referencing, and I find the concerns expressed by those voting delete perfectly valid in this regard. Discouting a number of votes I found to be inadequate, I found a consensus to delete this article. PeterSymonds (talk)08:21, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]