This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2024 September 4. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
The result was keep. Passions ran high in this discussion, as can be expected from such a loaded issue. I spent a fair amount of time trying to tease out the P&G-based arguments from the mere righteous indignation. A few !votes were discarded as irrelevant, mostly those that called for deletion based solely on the content being offensive; the article doesn't qualify as an "attack page".
A much larger number of participants expressed a view I found puzzling. Things like, "Delete unless we revert to revision so-and-so", or "Delete unless we rename it", or "Delete because it's a POV mess right now". To remind you, we are here to decide whether the topic justifies inclusion, not whether the current content or title are suitable. If the subject - under some title and with some content - should be kept, according to that participant, then this !vote should be counted as a Keep. Once we do that, the rough consensus to keep becomes a very clear consensus.
I am glad to see work on improving the content towards NPOV has already begun, and I trust a move discussion will proceed now that the AfD is closed, and settle on a more acceptable page title. Owen× ☎ 20:03, 3 September 2024 (UTC)