This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2019 June 23. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
The result was no consensus. There's a list of sources presented, with a claim that they are WP:RS. The nom disputes the quality of the sources, but neither side has made any arguments which are so clear-cut that I, as somebody not familiar with any of the source publications, can draw any clear conclusion. -- RoySmith (talk) 20:37, 22 June 2019 (UTC)