The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The first point of call here is to look at Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons#Deletion. Sadly (or, if you're more of the "hard cases make bad law type," happily) there is little proscriptive guidance there. This section appears to exist only to emphasise (and legitimise) that deletion is the end result of unsourced material on living people.
Having reviewed the policy goundwork, and turning to the dabate itself, very few of those commenting appeared to adress the issue raised in the nomination. Naming names here:
Shaliya waya/Tokyogirl79/Stonemason89 - Do not discuss Greaves at all, instead conflate him (the person) with the "case" (this event.)
Hinata/BabbaQ - Does not contribute meaningfuly to the debate. Does not explain at all why the nomination reasons do not apply.
Bigtimepeace - These comments appear well-informed and congruent with both the letter and spirit of policy.
98.254.220.120/Wnt - While these somewhat-prolix comments are clearly in good faith, they still fail to adress the nomination.
Given that the article's content (when the material related to the "one event" is removed) consists of "Greaves is a former nurse's aide," the only reasonable outcome to this debate is delete.
Aaron Brenneman (talk) 02:54, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]