The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. The nomination statement is very persuasive and I accept the arguments made in it entirely - no rebuttal was forthcoming despite multiple relistings. Daniel (talk) 11:37, 10 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]