Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rick Lentini

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 18:51, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[[Nick Landini]

({{Find sources|Nick Landini]})

Actor does not meet WP:N criteria. Only reference is IMDB (not a reliable source in and of itself anyway), but a look at his IMDB page shows no credits, only a self-submitted resume. Credits are mostly as a Technical Advisor and for minor roles "police officer," "soldier," "thief." Google searches aren't turning up much that isn't self-published/promotional, certainly not substantial coverage in reliable sources as is required. Zachlipton (talk) 05:48, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:34, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:34, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:34, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:35, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no substantial coverage of this person in third party sources. VQuakr (talk) 16:37, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - No IMDb credits, no appearance in an NFL game (failing WP:ATH). Eagles 24/7 (C) 20:34, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete smells like self-promotion--but even if it isn't, this is not a noteworthy article by any measure I can find.--Paul McDonald (talk) 03:28, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.