The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete . Article has since its creation included a major segment of text copied directly from the subject website. There is no verification of permission to use this material although the creator has been notified how to do so and the matter has been listed for more than seven days. There is no clean version to revert to. In addition consensus seems to be that even if the church may be notable, the current article doesn't verify or properly address this. There is no prejudice against creation of a new copyright-infringement free article on this church, provided that it verifies that it meets notability guidelines with proper reliable sources. --Moonriddengirl(talk)18:29, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]