The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep/no consensus. Would have been a no consensus, but no one bothered to rebut the sources Oakshade or Trevj provided thus Keep/No Consensus. Secretaccount03:11, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]