The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. BUT there does appear to be a lot of plagiarism in this article (try Google searching some whole sentences). Whilst undoubtedly notable, this article needs serious work. Black Kite (t)(c)23:38, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]