The result was delete. While there are reviews which establish that the book exists, it has been pointed out that the reviews have borderline notability under our inclusion criteria. It is possible that the book will generate enough reviews in more mainstream publications to meet our inclusion criteria, and at that point the article can be accepted on Wikipedia. The consensus among established Wikipedia members is that the article does not meet our inclusion criteria - the keep comments from the majority of the IP accounts have not been considered as, despite the accounts tracing to different locations in the world, there is a credible suspicion that they are sockpuppet accounts. I am willing to WP:Userfy the article on request. SilkTork ✔Tea time 12:36, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]