The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. I don't think there is consensus here about what to do with the article. While most similar cases would be deleted or merged under BLP1E, there are reasonable arguments that this case is high-profile enough to merit an exception to the rule. Both sides of the discussion make reasonable arguments here, and I feel that no consensus has been reached. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:15, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]