The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Long-standing community consensus is that verifiable inhabited places merit inclusion. The article has now been made more readable. Sandstein 17:40, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]