The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was No consensus. Technically, it is 7:4, which is below the conventional consensus threshold. The arguments of both sides are revolving against WP:N. Those who propose delete argue that since no sources have been found, the player is non-notable. Those who propose keep argue that he meets WP:NHOCKEY (based on RS) which is an indication that he might be notable, but the sources are difficult to find since he retired a while ago. Both arguments are valid, and since there is no strong prevalence, I close the discussion as no consensus defaulted as keep. There is no prejudice against checking the new consensus say a year from now.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:24, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]