The result was merge to Windows Server 2012. Spartaz Humbug! 17:21, 1 July 2013 (UTC) I have been asked to expand on my close. The consensus is that CRYSTAL applies. The keep side failed to substantiate sufficient reliable sources for a standalone article but the argument that this will be undoubtedly be notable has real merit. This dichotomy is reflected in the merge votes that recognise that there will be an article here in due cource. The common practise in these cases is to merge back into the main article and spin out the article again when there is sufficient reliable sources to create a substantial article. On this basis the merge votes appear to offer the best outcome between PRESERVE and CRYSTAL and also fit wider project consensus. I also have much less weight to keep votes that do not cite policy. So we don't ignore N based on a single primary source, as both N/GNG require multiple reliable sources to merit a standalone article. We also don't create article on the basis that other products have articles and we also accept that multiple reliable sources can be based on a single press release, which is why we are cautious about this kind of thing. ChrisGuiltari had the best keep argument but the points he made gained little traction from subsequent reviewers so I am, to a degree bound by the policy based votes that follow on. Hope this helps. Spartaz Humbug! 18:07, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]