- The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA. The result of the discussion was
Speedily Re-Approved. While the AbuseFilter has been active since March 2009, its ability to block has not been enabled. An AN discussion in August 2009 also revisited the bot's approval, and consensus there was in favor of the bot continuing to run. Therefore, I am speedily re-approving this bot to continue running. If the AbuseFilter's blocking ability ever is enabled, this and other blocking adminbots should be evaluated for continued necessity and consensus. Anomie⚔ 00:27, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
- The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. The result of the discussion was Approved. until such time as the AbuseFilter extension or a substantially indentical technical feature is turned on by the sysadmins at the English Wikipedia. At such a time, a report should be made to the bot owners' noticeboard requesting that Chris G either to turn off the bot or seek re-approval in a Wikipedia:BRFA. MBisanz talk 01:11, 18 January 2009 (UTC)