The list was archived by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [1].[reply]
I am nominating the 1982 Oscars for featured list because we believe it has great potential to become a Featured List. I followed how the 1929, 1979, 1980, 1981, 1982, 1984, 1986, 1987, 1988, 1989, 1990, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, and 2023 ceremonies were written. Birdienest81talk 09:06, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
...Redgrave remarked in her acceptance speech,"And I salute you, and I pay tribute to you, and I think you should be very proud that in the last few weeks you've stood firm, and you have refused to be intimidated by the threats of a small bunch of Zionist hoodlums."There is a space missing. It's unclear who Redgrave meant with "you" here; this could be resolved with some explanatory word or by quoting more of the speech. The quotation is cut off. According to other sources, the sentence continued: "...a small bunch of Zionist hoodlums whose behavior is an insult to the stature of Jews all over the world and their great and heroic record of struggle against fascism and oppression." Either expand it to the full sentence or make it clear that it is not the full sentence.
Nothing more that I can spot, other than the things others already have mentioned. The sources I looked at check out, with the exception of the part with the original works, and assuming good faith for all the ones I can't access. (You've written 1982 in the nomination, but the article is about the 1978 Oscars.) Ffranc (talk) 15:09, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Unfortunately, this nomination has been open for more than two months with no supports, and has had open comments for almost as long with no response. To keep the queue moving, I'm going to close this nomination; feel free to renominate once the outstanding issues have been addressed. --PresN 20:25, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The list was archived by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:26, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [2].[reply]
For the past year I have worked to improve this list to it's fullest potential by filling a great deal of the biographies, images and accurate information. While my work is not quite done, and may not be for a while, I believe this article fits the FL criteria in recognition of my efforts. TheBritinator (talk) 14:13, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
|+ caption_textas the first line of the table code; if that caption would duplicate a nearby section header, you can make it screen-reader-only by putting
|+ {{sronly|caption_text}}instead.
!scope=colto each header cell, e.g.
! rowspan=2| {{abbr|No.|Number}} becomes !scope=col rowspan=2| {{abbr|No.|Number}}. If the cell spans multiple columns with a colspan, then use !scope=colgroupinstead.
!scope=rowto each primary cell, e.g.
| bgcolor="{{party color|Independent politician}}" |'''1''' becomes !scope=row bgcolor="{{party color|Independent politician}}" |'''1'''. If the cell spans multiple rows with a rowspan, then use !scope=rowgroupinstead.
@TheBritinator: are you still pursuing this nomination? It appears that not all of MPGuy2824's concerns have been addressed (I just fixed one, but the monarch column is still erroneously a header (! instead of |). @ChrisTheDude: Do you intend to return to re-check your review? --PresN 14:50, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Unfortunately, this nomination has been open for a long time without any support. In order to keep the queue manageable, I'm going to have to close it. Feel free to renominate it in the future; things that have helped nominations get more/quicker reviews in the past include advertising the nomination to likely editors and wikiprojects, as well as mentioning it when reviewing other FLC nominations. --PresN 16:30, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The list was archived by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [3].[reply]
I am nominating this list for featured list because it is a complete, fully referenced, and well organized presentation of the symbols of this state. This list has been peer reviewed at Wikipedia:Peer_review/List_of_Colorado_state_symbols/archive1#List_of_Colorado_state_symbols Thank you, Buaidh talk e-mail 18:54, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Reywas92Talk 22:45, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
|+ caption_textas the first line of the table code; if that caption would duplicate a nearby section header, you can make it screen-reader-only by putting
|+ {{sronly|caption_text}}instead.
!scope=colto each header cell, e.g.
!width=140px| Type becomes !scope=col width=140px| Type. If the cell spans multiple columns with a colspan, then use !scope=colgroupinstead.
!scope=rowto each primary cell, e.g.
|[[Historical armorial of U.S. states from 1876|Coat of arms]] becomes !scope=row |[[Historical armorial of U.S. states from 1876|Coat of arms]]. If the cell spans multiple rows with a rowspan, then use !scope=rowgroupinstead.
The lead is still too short I'd say. I don't believe you saw that Reywas92 mentioned this (they didn't sign the comment, so I understand missing it) after your initial response to them. Hey man im josh (talk) 17:22, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello there, I came here from my own FLC about California, so I figure, why not another C state themed FLC review?
All in all, the article is pretty good, but there are a lot of small things that prevent me from supporting at the moment. I appreciate the effort, and I think you can still get a featured list out of this. Please let me know if you have any questions. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 18:52, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Unfortunately, this nomination has been open for a long time without any support, and the nominator has been inactive for a few weeks. In order to keep the queue manageable, I'm going to have to close it. Feel free to renominate it in the future; things that have helped nominations get more/quicker reviews in the past include advertising the nomination to likely editors and wikiprojects, as well as mentioning it when reviewing other FLC nominations. --PresN 16:30, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The list was archived by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [9].[reply]
Second time nominating; since the previous nomination closed, all outstanding suggestions have been incorporated (plural verbs fixed, links to monsters/concepts added in episode summaries, additional images). In terms of major new additions, the Production and format section has been expanded with a new paragraph on filming/set design (to go with corresponding image) and there's a new subsection on the 3 specials that have since aired (with corresponding images). There are 3 new plot sums (for the specials) and the Reception section has a new paragraph on set design & objects used in play. I'm really hopeful that the episode list will be promoted this time. Looking forward to the reviews! Sariel Xilo (talk) 22:23, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
|season_name = ''Critical Role'' (campaign two) to override it, just so the infobox title matches the article title.
|starring= parameter.
|LineColor = #FFDD00 so that the line color matches the table color.
The amount of prose in this article almost leads me to suggest that it should be at WP:FAC instead, and I'd likely insist if it was a typical series with ~15-20 episodes. But with, 141 episodes I can see why it's here instead. Regardless, I commend the work that's been done here so far and want to say good work! TheDoctorWho (talk) 07:04, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
|base_alt= but that didn't work when I tried it. If I have time tomorrow, I'll take a look at some of the image template options to see how to fix it. Sariel Xilo (talk) 02:52, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
[[File:Critical_Role_C2E98_"Dark_Waters"_screenshot.png|250px|thumb|right|Four camera layout during an ocean battle scene in the Episode: "Dark Waters".***INSERT CITATION HERE (''I had to take it out of the code box due to errors, it's the same citation currently cited in the article'')***|alt=InsertAltTextHere]] it should work. The "thumb" in the link makes it a thumbnail identical to the frame template. Unbulleted list appears the same as plainlist, and is given as an option in Infobox instruction so that works for me! That said, it doesn't need updated to plainlist, but if you're curious; I believe the only reason that plainlist didn't work for you is because the bulletpoints (*) have to be flush with the left side of the code editor, you can see an example with this article and can see how it appears in the editor. |caption=This is a captionin the Episode table template; if that caption would duplicate a nearby section header, you can make it screen-reader-only by putting
|caption={{sronly|caption_text}}instead.
|caption={{sronly|List of episodes in 2018}} in the first episode table which is similar to the caption in the episode table at Last Week Tonight with John Oliver (season 1). If that caption is enough, I'll replicate it in the other tables. But if not, I would appreciate additional guidance. Thanks! Sariel Xilo (talk) 04:31, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Unfortunately, this nomination has been open for a long time without much support, and no comments at all for over 6 weeks. In order to keep the queue manageable, I'm going to have to close it. Feel free to renominate it in the future; things that have helped nominations get more/quicker reviews in the past include advertising the nomination to likely editors and wikiprojects, as well as mentioning it when reviewing other FLC nominations. --PresN 16:30, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]