Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Failed log/October 2017

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was archived by Giants2008 via FACBot (talk) 23:31, 22 October 2017 (UTC) [1].[reply]

Nominator(s): Mattximus (talk) 13:49, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I brought this page from a stub to what I think is featured list quality using some of the templates I made for other list of municipalities in both the USA (ex:List of cities and towns in Montana) and Canada (ex:List of municipalities in Nunavut). It seems Mexican geography articles are under represented on here, so I thought I'd give this one a try. It is a small list, and I used previous comments from my other 14 successful nominations to inform this article. Thanks for the review! Mattximus (talk) 13:49, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Why isn't "List of municipalities in Colima" the title of this article? Sandvich18 (talk) 13:09, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure, but all Latin American articles appear to be this way. I have nominated Cantons of Costa Rica without problem. The list of is a bit redundant I think, but if you think it should be changed that could be done, but it should be done to all ~40 or so articles... Mattximus (talk) 13:54, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Closing note: This candidate has been archived, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Giants2008 (Talk) 21:26, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was archived by Giants2008 via FACBot (talk) 23:31, 22 October 2017 (UTC) [2].[reply]

Nominator(s): Snowflake91 (talk) 19:32, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am nominating this for featured list because the article has clear inclusion criterias, is well-sourced, and was modelled after other similar football FL lists. Snowflake91 (talk) 19:32, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from Harrias ^talk

• First, big one is that the table needs to be accessible. MOS:DTT gives some guidance on this.
• The equals signs don't work in the '#' column, as they break the sortability.
• Personally, I'd expect this list to give me some indication of the captains of the team.
• Visually, I think the table would be better narrower.
• The lead could probably do with being expanded a little bit more for a featured list too.

Overall I think a fair amount of work is needed to improve this to Featured quality. Perhaps take a look at the more recently promoted List of Cardiff City F.C. players for a more up to date idea of what is expected. Harrias ^talk 09:01, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Response

Hello, thanks for your comments. Resolving the problems:

• Done, recreated the table from scratch.
• Removed "#" column, which is not really needed.
• Marked players which captained the team in five or more matches with source; there are no "fixed" captains over longer period, so its hard to do it year-by-year.
• The table is now narrower, same as on Cardiff article.
• Expanded the lead with 3-4 new sentences, if the lead is still too short I would like some ideas what could be mentioned as well since I cant think of anything. Snowflake91 (talk) 19:33, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Closing note: This candidate has been archived, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Giants2008 (Talk) 21:32, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was not promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 23:32, 9 October 2017 (UTC) [3].[reply]

Nominator(s): Cartoon network freak (talk) 04:58, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am nominating this for featured list because I think it fully satisfies the criteria. The article has been a mess before, but now it's on a much better level. I would greatly appreciate comments. Cartoon network freak (talk) 04:58, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Oppose - regretfully there's just too much missing info -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 12:02, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose - Largely per ChrisTheDude. Not a bad list overall, but the lede seems a bit short and the tables have too many columns with Unknown labels in them for me to be able top support, unfortunately. Sportsguy17 (T • C) 18:55, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• @ChrisTheDude:, @Sportsguy17: Would List of Romanian Top 100 number ones of the 2010s be ready for a future nomination? Best, Cartoon network freak (talk) 20:05, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• It looks like that list has the same issue with missing information unfortunately. Aoba47 (talk) 21:18, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Closing as not promoted. --PresN 21:18, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Closing note: This candidate has been not promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.