The list was promoted by Giants2008 via FACBot (talk) 12:25, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [1].[reply]
After bringing Rachelle Ann Go's list of roles and awards to FL status, here's another related list that I am nominating. This list includes songs she has recorded and released that span her two-decade career. Happy to address your comments and thanks to all who take the time to review the list. Pseud 14 (talk) 14:44, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Great work overall, and I expect to support once the alt text is addressed. Dylan620 (he/him • talk • edits) 21:33, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It is good to see you working with another! At a glance, the prose looks good to me and the table "contents" widget is working properly. I do not see any substantial issues apart from the following:
| Current revision | Expected |
|---|---|
| "Alam ng Ating Mga Puso" | "Alam ng Ating Mga Puso" |
| ... | ... |
| "I Will Always Love You Anyway" | "I Will Always Love You Anyway" |
| "If" | "I'll Always Love You" |
| "If You Don't Know Me by Now" | "I'm Sure" |
| "If You Walk Away" | "If" |
| "Ikaw Lang" | "If You Don't Know Me by Now" |
| "I'll Always Love You" | "If You Walk Away" |
| "I'm Sure" | "Ikaw Lang" |
| "In Your Eyes" | "In Your Eyes" |
| ... | ... |
| "Masasabi Mo Ba" | "Masasabi Mo Ba" |
| "The Movie In My Mind" | "Missing You" |
| "Missing You" | "The Movie in My Mind" |
| "My Forever Love" | "My Forever Love" |
| ... | ... |
| "Pagkakataon" | "Pagkakataon" |
| "Palm Reader" | "Palad Mo sa Puso Ko" |
| "Palad Mo sa Puso Ko" | "Palm Reader" |
| "Promise Me" | "Promise Me" |
| ... | ... |
| "You Kissed My Tears" | "You Kissed My Tears" |
That's all I have for this list, and I will happily support once everything is addressed. Great work, as always! Do ping me if you have addressed the above or have any comments. If you can spare some time, it would be great if you could take a look at my current FLC, which would be needing comments. – Relayed (t • c) 16:00, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Source review: Passed
I don't love Spotify links, and I'd prefer a better source, but I recognize that contextually they verify the information they're being cited for. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:30, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The list was promoted by Giants2008 via FACBot (talk) 12:25, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [2].[reply]
Here's my 50th nomination in this series. In this particular year some of the biggest names in R&B gained their first number ones: Mary J. Blige, TLC, and a guy I'm sure a lot of us would prefer not to have to think too much about but I guess you can't change history..... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 21:06, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Image review: Passed
Source review: Passed
Comments:
That's all I've got. Good stuff Chris, and congrats on hitting that milestone! Gonna have a large and awesome featured topic if you keep at it! Hey man im josh (talk) 15:53, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The list was promoted by Giants2008 via FACBot (talk) 12:25, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [3].[reply]
This will be list #8 for me in this series and, hopefully, #28 in the series to be promoted. One of the charter members of the NFL and the oldest continuously run professional football franchise, this most resembles and copies the format of my previous nominations of List of Chicago Bears first-round draft picks (a fellow charter member and second oldest franchise) and List of Detroit Lions first-round draft picks (fifth oldest franchise). As always, I will do my best to response quickly to address any and all concerns that are brought up. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:56, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Image review: Passed
I will taking ref numbers from this revision [4]. At first glance all refs seem to be from relaible sources. I'll begin manually checking themQuestions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 16:19, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Good job on this. I'll try and get access to those sources I dont have to finish the review. Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 17:50, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 12:26, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [5].[reply]
Continuing in my series of Seattle sports seasons and a streak of basketball lists: the Seattle SuperSonics played 41 seasons in Seattle before they were uprooted by their new ownership and moved to Oklahoma City. This list was rewritten from scratch in a manner similar to the Seattle Storm list that was just promoted. SounderBruce 04:13, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Image review: Passed
Source review passed; promoting. --PresN 02:55, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 12:25, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [6].[reply]
I am nominating this for featured list because it is a list containing so much information and history about Australian/ Victorian politics. There are very few FAs and FLs in the Victorian Politics wikiproject. (peer review) GMH Melbourne (talk) 02:53, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
!scope=col, and the Term of office cell should use
!scope=colgroupinstead.
!scope=rowto each primary cell, e.g.
! rowspan="2" style="background:{{party color|Independent politician}};" scope="row" | 1 becomes !scope=row rowspan="2" style="background:{{party color|Independent politician}};" scope="row" | 1. If the cell spans multiple rows with a rowspan, then use !scope=rowgroupinstead. Along with that, you currently have two cells per row set as the header- the Premier cell should have a | instead of a !.
Source review passed; promoting. --PresN 02:55, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 12:25, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [7].[reply]
After successfully working on two SB19-related lists, here comes my next offering. This is the list, which I overhauled last February, that documents the awards and nominations received by SB19 since their debut in 2018. They have received well over 100 80 notable nominations from local and international award-giving bodies for the past five years, among which they have won over 70 40 (which I do believe are the most numbers from any Filipino boy/girl group).[citation needed] They are indeed revolutionary because, apart from transforming P-pop, they have claimed multiple "firsts", from being the first Filipino group to chart a single on World Digital Song Sales to being the first Filipino act to be nominated for the Top Social Artist award at the 2021 Billboard Music Awards.
I am nominating this for featured list because I have stuck myself with the idea of improving Wikipedia's coverage of Filipino artists, starting with SB19, and hopefully bringing SB19 to a featured topic someday! All suggestions and feedback are welcome and much appreciated. I sincerely thank the reviewers who will put their time and effort here. – Relayed(né Abacusada) (t • c) 15:45, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm kinda really doing you a favor in reviewing all of the SB19 FLC/FAC at this point haha. Tables review in a few minutes! — VAUGHAN J. (t · c) 10:11, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
{{Abbr|Ref(s).|Reference(s)}} → {{Abbr|Ref.|Reference(s)}} per my last reviewJeez, that was fast! That's all the concerns I have. — VAUGHAN J. (t · c) 10:16, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, MPGuy2824! Thanks for having a look! I have addressed all your comments. Let me know if you have anything else. – Relayed (t • c) 07:12, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Source review passed; promoting. --PresN 02:55, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 12:25, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [11].[reply]
Line of Duty is a critically acclaimed BBBC series with a large international cult following. I noticed the table that existed in the parent series article was fairly large and mostly unsourced. Over the past few days I've been working on building this from scratch, and actually haven't looked at the old table at all, solely building this from sources I gathered myself. It feels comprehensive enough to meet the criteria for a featured list, and the article falls within the scope of a good topic I'm working towards, so I'm nominating it. The first two paragraphs are largely background information for understanding of why the awards/nominations were received, while the third paragraph summarizes the list of awards itself.
Note: This is my second current featured list candidate. The other one has two supports as well as a comment from a coordinator that has been addressed leading me to believe it meets the "substantial support" requirement. TheDoctorWho (talk) 06:48, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
!scope=colto each header cell, e.g.
!rowspan=2|Season becomes !scope=col rowspan=2|Season. If the cell spans multiple columns with a colspan, then use !scope=colgroupinstead. Same for rows.
Great work! Sgubaldo (talk) 12:16, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Source review passed; promoting. --PresN 02:55, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:26, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [12].[reply]
I waffled a bit on whether now was the right time to submit this – I currently have another timeline FLC outstanding, which admittedly hasn't progressed as much as I would've hoped by now – but I am confident enough that this timeline meets the FL criteria that I have decided to submit it anyway. One of the things that makes the 1993 Pacific hurricane season stand out is how many of its storms went on to reach high intensities; out of 15 total storms, a whopping 60% became major hurricanes! Two of these reached maximum sustained winds of 150 mph (240 km/h), the highest of any storm this season, at the same time. While there was unfortunately some adverse impact – most notably from Hurricane Calvin, which was a disastrous event for the Manzanillo area – there were also several long-lived and powerful hurricanes that largely remained out to sea with no harm to life or property. That kind of storm is, I would like to think, any meteorologist or storm tracker's favorite type of hurricane.
This timeline was largely modeled after the 2018 and 2020 Pacific hurricane season timelines, both of which are FLs. I have worked to apply feedback from the other FLC to this timeline as well. Dylan620 (he/him • talk • edits) 18:26, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Source review: Passed
Source review comments:
Thanks what I've got. Hey man im josh (talk) 17:26, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Per MOS:PSEUDOHEAD, the use of ";" to make psuedo-headers is not acceptable. It's ironically fixable in two opposite ways: either make them actual headers (e.g. ====June 1====), or make them actual bold text (e.g. June 1), but the semicolon is for a list thing that you're not actually doing, which messes up screen-reader software. --PresN 04:40, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Image review : Passed
MPGuy2824
Promoting. --PresN 20:25, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:26, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [13].[reply]
SZA. You might know her from "Kill Bill" or "Snooze", or the fact that she has a whimsical name that rhymes with sizzle and scissor, or the dozens of passe jokes about how she lies all the time. She has been in the game for over a decade, changing the contemporary R&B (and now pop) scene as she goes with her highly acclaimed works. Her first two albums are in Rolling Stone's GOAT list, and the first one (2017) has never left the US charts. Dive into her relatively short discography here. Elias 🪐 (dreaming of Saturn; talk here) 07:22, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm going to take a look at this in the coming days. Dylan620 (he/him • talk • edits) 00:36, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
...and has charted for over five subsequent years: Replacing "over" with "more than" would work better here.
SZA appeared in some film soundtracks: in → on
The article looks pretty good to me, so I mostly.just have nitpicks.
@ZooBlazer Responses made. Thank you for your comments. Elias 🪐 (dreaming of Saturn; talk here) 05:16, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That's all I have. Like I said, mostly nitpicks. The article is in pretty good shape, which I expect coming from you. If you have the interest and time, I also have an open FLC if you'd like to have a look. -- ZooBlazer 03:59, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Only a few notes. Great work on the list! TheDoctorWho (talk) 06:25, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Promoting. --PresN 20:25, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:26, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [14].[reply]
And now for something completely different... Normally I work on TV-related lists, but this was an interesting dive into a different type of list. This was modeled off existing FLs of university leaders, though there is less of a consistent format across them so I am open to suggestions for changes here. I've also aimed to provide a brief list of other offices for each individual as context – in the process of finding sources for that, I was able to address two redlinks in the article, and the rest should follow in time. I've striven to make sense of conflicting dates in several places and hope that my research has been thorough enough to support this list. RunningTiger123 (talk) 18:29, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Great job as a nearly flawless list! Also, If you have time would you care for reviewing the List of accolades received by TV Patrol regarding its featured list nomination? Chompy Ace 08:18, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Source review passed; promoting. --PresN 20:25, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [15].[reply]
This will be list #7 for me in this series and, provided all goes well, #27 in the series to be promoted. Nothing really different about this list, continues on using the same format as the other first-round pick lists that I've nominated. As always, I will do my best to response quickly to address any and all concerns that are brought up. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:56, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Example text– Fixed
I would merge the two short paragraphs at the end of the lead together– I'm torn on this. These paragraphs are broken up the same way in the other lists that I've worked on and I'd like them to be consistent.
Example text– Done.
On that note, there's only one pick listed for 1966 in the table, so why was it "additional"?– It's meant to continue off of the point of the previous sentence, in that, a first-round selection that was chosen by the team actually chose to sign elsewhere. I've added a couple commas that I hope make this slightly clearer.
Image review: Passed
, who remained the owner until his death in 2013,, the commas make this a complicated sentence. Maybe mdashes or parentheses would work better?
For those two seasons, the team was known as the Tennessee Oilers, but changed its name to the Tennessee Titans for the 1999 season, when they moved into Adelphia Coliseum, now known as Nissan Stadium, where they have played their home games since.split this up, run-on sentence
he was the team's territorial selectionmaybe a brief explanation of what this means?
joined the NFL instead->
joined the Chicago Bears of the NFL instead
That's all I got hey man im josh. Nice work. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 18:29, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
, who remained the owner until his death in 2013,, the commas make this a complicated sentence. Maybe mdashes or parentheses would work better?– I put a portion of that in brackets now, let me know what you think.
For those two seasons, the team was known as the Tennessee Oilers, but changed its name to the Tennessee Titans for the 1999 season, when they moved into Adelphia Coliseum, now known as Nissan Stadium, where they have played their home games since. split this up, run-on sentence– Yeah, wow, is it ever, eh? I've made some changes, let me know if you think it's decent now.
he was the team's territorial selection maybe a brief explanation of what this means?– I included an explanation of the territorial picks in the paragraph above that which I believe/hope is adequete. Let me know if it's not and I'll see what more I can do.
joined the NFL instead -> joined the Chicago Bears of the NFL instead– Good suggestion, done.
The notes in the 1965 and 2022 rows have periods at the end of the sentences, while the rest of the notes do not. Can you rephrase these two to not be two sentences and thus not have the periods.– I've used this format across all of the first-round picks. I've added full stops in cases where I didn't feel it flowed well to combine what were essentially two separate and unrelated notes. I'm not sure there's a good way to refactor these in a way that I could apply to all of the lists. I'm not opposed to utilizing a different format, I'd just prefer to do so in a way that can be applied across all of these articles.
The picture of Earl Campbell is rather blurry. There's a clearer one on his article.– Yeah I went back and forth on which to include. I do think you're right that it's better to use that one. Switched.
Typo on "running back" immediately after that picture.– That's embarrassing. Fixed.
The first mention of retired numbers could link to that section of the Titans' page.– I've added some links.
Likewise for Titans Ring of Honor.– I've added some links.
I don't know whether there's a Wikipedia convention for this, but I find it a bit counter-intuitive that the team are referred to as Tennessee in the trade notes from 1960-1996– I get exactly where you're coming from on this. I've worked on 12 of these lists and I've internally battled about what fits best for other articles as well, such as the Cardinals and Patriots. I've approached it from the perspective of the reader, and from a point of view that we're referring to the team as a whole, not necessarily their name at the time. I'm open to rewriting these, but I'm not sure of the best way to do so while making it easy for readers to follow. Do you have any suggestions?
Similarly, the table could be titled "Houston Oilers / Tennessee Titans first-round draft picks"– In that case we'd want to name all three names they'd gone by I imagine. I'd like to hear your answer to my above response before I implement this. I only want to wait because I'm considering how/if I should implement this change across all of the relevant pages I've worked on in this series.
Did the Oilers make the selection themselves, or was is collectively decided by all eight owners? The source seems a little unclear, saying "they were unanimously agreed upon by the other teams" but also "Billy Cannon who was selected by the Houston Oilers with their territorial pick". Perhaps the article should reflect this ambiguity?– So, those are actually two separate statements. The idea is that each team got to select whatever player they wanted within their region before the next phase of the draft started. After that phase of the draft, the territorial selections, teams agreed upon the top 8 players at each position, which were then randomly assigned to teams. So each time agreed on who the best players were at positions and randomly got one. The only selection ACTUALLY made by any team during the 1960 AFL draft was their territorial selection, the rest were randomly assigned to them after sort of "tiers" were decided upon.
The term "cash" seems a bit informal for an encyclopedia. Would recommend giving the exact amount, or else "an unspecified sum of money" if it's unknown.– I went based on the language that the Broncos used, but that's a fair criticism. I've changed it to "an unspecified sum of money".
With regard to the territorial picks, I'm still not entirely sure. The phrase "unanimously agreed upon" does appear to be referring to the regional picks rather than the general lottery that followed it. Still, the latter sentence is so explicit in saying that he was selected "by the Oilers" I can't object if you're personally satisfied. There don't seem to be any other reliable online sources to shed further light.– I'll mull this over a bit, look over what I might have stashed away in a folder of possibly useful bookmarks, and see if I can figure out some better wording.
With regard to the trade notes, you can get around it for the Cardinals and Patriots by referring to them by their nicknames– I could use the nickname for the Cardinals and Patriots, but I'm trying to apply the same formatting and style to all of these lists that I've worked on. As you said though, this wouldn't work for this list (or the KC list).
Source review passed; promoting. --PresN 20:25, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [16].[reply]
Here's the 49th article in this series for your delectation. In this year one artist reached number one for the first time after 15 years on the chart and another act reached number one for the first time who was actually aged 15. Feedback as ever will be gratefully received and swiftly acted upon -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 22:24, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Image review: Passed
I came here from my own FLC, and saw the other Hot R&B singles from 1990 already had several supports, so I thought I'd review this instead.
Ultimately these all are minor. I imagine I'll be able to support without much work. Let me know what you think about my comments. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 00:43, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That's all from me. These were mostly nitpicks as the article looks great already, so if you disagree with the comments, not a big deal. Great job with the article. -- ZooBlazer 02:27, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Source review: Passed
Feedback:
Great job as always Chris! Side note, it's been bugging me today that I don't fully understand the inconsistencies in some of these Billboard namings. Some of them are using a hyphen in "number-one". Is it "number ones" and "number-one" as a standard? Is there a de facto correct usage? I'd love to find something to better understand the naming conventions of these various Billboard articles. If so, I can do some cleanup on the article namings when I get time. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:50, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Promoting. --PresN 20:25, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [17].[reply]
Following in the footsteps of the head coaches and presidents lists, I now have the general manager list for the Packers. I will pre-emptively state that this list wasn't the easiest, as there are multiple times in Packers' history where there was no GM, but obviously someone(s) still had the authority to act like a GM. This list is based off of what the Packers have established as their own list of GMs (see here and here). Happy to address any concerns or comments. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 17:38, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Image review : Passed
Source review: Passed
Feedback:
That's all I've got, good stuff as always Gonzo, even if I hate the Packers! Hey man im josh (talk) 18:36, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Promoting. --PresN 20:25, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:26, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [18].[reply]
Zimbabwe has five sites on the list and two tentative sites, so this list is on the shorter side. Standard style. The list for South Africa is already seeing support so I am adding a new nomination. Tone 10:00, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Source review passed; promoting. --PresN 16:30, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:26, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [19].[reply]
Supermassive Games is the company behind games such as Until Dawn, The Quarry, and The Dark Pictures Anthology. I figured it was time to change things up a little and nominate my first video game list for FLC. -- ZooBlazer 06:06, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@ChrisTheDude: Thanks for another great review. I think I fixed everything. -- ZooBlazer 16:46, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
In addition to Chris's comments above
@Pseud 14: Thanks for the review! I addressed/commented on everything above. -- ZooBlazer 17:05, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not a full review, just a question: I've done a lot of "video games by company" lists, so I'm familiar with the various formats used and have usually used wikitables for companies with more like 100 games (e.g. List of 3D Realms games) and templates like {{Video game titles}} for ones with more like 35 or less (e.g. List of id Software games). There's no set guideline, I'm just curious if it was a specific choice for this list or if you went with a wikitable by default. --PresN 20:54, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Great job as a nearly flawless list! Also, If you have time would you care for reviewing the List of accolades received by TV Patrol regarding its featured list nomination? Chompy Ace 07:03, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Since this has substantial support and seems to be missing a source review, thought I'd strike this from the pending list. Version reviewed
Formatting
Reliability
Verifiability
Great work overall, just a couple of formatting fixes. Pseud 14 (talk) 20:55, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Promoting. --PresN 16:32, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [20].[reply]
I'm back, y'all, with #36 in our perpetual series of mammals lists: hedgehogs! Also gymnures, collectively making up the family Erinaceidae. This kicks off the four families of the order Eulipotyphla, and I've started with a small one at only 24 species. These guys are pretty cute, and more importantly were fairly easy to source. As always, this list follows the pattern of the previous lists and reflects previous FLC comments. Thanks for reviewing! --PresN 16:14, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I love hedgehogs and this looks like it will be a fun image review :D saving this space – should have something more substantial here in the next couple days! Dylan620 (he/him • talk • edits) 22:48, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The article looks great overall, so I have little to say besides that the IUCN red list link for File:Atelerix albiventris range map.png gives a "page cannot be found". -- ZooBlazer 07:19, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I came here from my own nature-themed FLC, so figured, why not review a list about some cute little critters?
So some random spotchecking and bits:
All in all, it's a good read, and is informative. I was nitpicky about sourcing and such, so I hope my comments aren't too difficult to address. Kudos to your work, @PresN:. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 23:19, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Since I'm currently the only active FLC closer, doing an IAR close of my own nomination as promoted. --PresN 16:30, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [21].[reply]
I am nominating this for featured list because as a streaming television series this series has beat all the odds. Television series that are sequels to former film series typically don't fare well, which can be seen with the animated Karate Kid TV series. Those that do, rarely feature large appearances from the original cast. It was also essentially cancelled by YouTube yet managed to find a new service to stream on. On top of that, it survived COVID-19 and the double strikes of 2023. As the original film approaches its forty-year anniversary it feels like the proper time to nominate this. I recently expanded the lead on this, and with the addition of the sixth season table, I believe it should be a featured list. TheDoctorWho (talk) 09:49, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
|caption=caption_textin the Episode table template; if that caption would duplicate a nearby section header, you can make it screen-reader-only by putting
|caption={{sronly|caption_text}}instead.
this was delayed to 2024- The season was delayed to 2024
the end of the first while Thomas Ian Griffith- Add a comma after first
As of September 9, 2022, 50 episodes of Cobra Kai have been released, concluding the fifth season.- This can be moved to the beginning of the episodes section.
That's all I have. Good work on the article. -- ZooBlazer 18:12, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Source review passed; promoting. --PresN 16:30, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [26].[reply]
I am nominating this for featured list because I believe that it meets all the criteria. I think it has enough content and an organized list to get the featured status. Thanks. RoboCric Let's chat 13:41, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@RoboCric: Just a few suggestions:
I think that's all I can see so far! (talk) 11:51, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment on sources: Penbugs appears to be a blog with no indication of editorial oversight; can you give your reasoning for why it counts as an RS? --PresN 02:59, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, that sort it out. Source review passed; promoting. --PresN 16:30, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 8 April 2024 (UTC) [27].[reply]
I am nominating this for featured list because it meets the criteria for FL everything I spent a bi of time painstakingly sourcing everything on the page. I reached out to another editor (@Lady Lotus:) to co-nominate this with me and they agreed. Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 07:07, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
In addition to Chris's comments above
|+ caption_textas the first line of the table code; if that caption would duplicate a nearby section header, you can make it screen-reader-only by putting
|+ {{sronly|caption_text}}instead. Done
Helping out a fellow WikiCup participant as a thank-you for approving the DYK hook I submitted recently :) Quick note though, I've converted the "Done" templates into text – the FLC participation instructions discourage graphics and templates containing graphics, as they slow down the load time.
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
alt=Headshot of James McAvoy, which would not be particularly helpful.)Once the first point is addressed, I will be comfortable supporting. Dylan620 (he/him • talk • edits) 22:21, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Source review passed; promoted. --PresN 15:34, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 8 April 2024 (UTC) [28].[reply]
The history of Billboard's R&B chart moves into a new decade and a lady called Mariah comes along. Something tells me she will go on to be quite successful. Comments as ever will be most gratefully received and swiftly acted upon...... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:00, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Source review: Passed
The only thing I could find is, based on the reference, the song "Misunderstanding " should be "Missunderstanding". Great job as always Chris! Hey man im josh (talk) 16:15, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Image review
Nothing else to add
Promoted. --PresN 15:34, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 8 April 2024 (UTC) [29].[reply]
I've brought this list up to the standard of the Tripura FL. Criticisms and suggestions for improvement are welcome. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 04:32, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm going to take a closer look at this in the coming days. I do have a couple comments for now:
and the Constitution lays down the general principles of positive discrimination for STs.[4][2]: 35, 137– it seems a little odd that ref 4 appears before ref 2 here.
Mizoram was converted into a state, and the number of constituencies for its legislative assembly was increased to 40.– this should be directly followed by a source to back it up, especially since it's at the end of a paragraph.
Dylan620 (he/him • talk • edits) 22:56, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The 2011 census of India stated that indigenous population constitute 95% of the state's total population.– mixed verb tenses here.
Source review passed; promoted. --PresN 15:34, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 12:26, 5 April 2024 (UTC) [30].[reply]
The latest in the series of professional snooker ranking list nominations. The list took tournaments other than the World Snooker Championship into consideration for the first time. I can't claim that it is among the interesting of list articles, but hopefully it's close to meeting the criteria. I can provide extracts from relevant sources to reviewers. Thanks in advance for improvement suggestions. Regards, BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 17:24, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Image review: Passed
Thank you, OlifanofmrTennant. I've linked Birmingham Evening Mail. Regards, BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 09:31, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Promoting. --PresN 01:45, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 12:26, 5 April 2024 (UTC) [31].[reply]
Yet another list of municipalities with a standardized format that now includes 43 (!!) lists in North American jurisdictions. Inspired by real encyclopedias with consistent formatting and high standards, I'm helping to achieve this for lists of municipalities. I tried to incorporate changes from previous nominations but I'm sure I've missed some and there can always be improvements. Thanks for your reviews Mattximus (talk) 19:52, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
|+ caption_textas the first line of the table code; if that caption would duplicate a nearby section header, you can make it screen-reader-only by putting
|+ {{sronly|caption_text}}instead.
Planning to review this, but I'll probably wait for MPGuy2824's reaction (I see they are away until the 25th). Also, just want to be clear that I don't read Spanish, so my review will be more in the nature of checking-the-boxes, and I'm hoping someone will look at this who can read the sources. - Dank (push to talk) 12:59, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Source review passed; promoting. --PresN 01:45, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 12:25, 5 April 2024 (UTC) [32].[reply]
After recently expanding the main article of Filipino singer Rachelle Ann Go, here's her work and awards list which I have lumped into one article, tailored to FLs like List of roles and awards of Oscar Isaac and List of roles and awards of Catherine Zeta-Jones. Happy to address your comments and thanks to all who take the time to review the list. Pseud 14 (talk) 02:35, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
for which she won the Myx Music Award for Favorite Mellow Video- I think this is missing a ref. The ref before mentions being nominated, but doesn't mention winning, while the following ref doesn't seem to mention the award at all.
earning the Awit Award for Best R&B Recording- Also seems to be missing a ref.
For the production, she won the Star Award for Revival Album of the Year, and garnered nominations for Female Recording Artist of the Year and Female Pop Artist of the Year at the 2009 ceremony. Another single from the album, "This Time I'll Be Sweeter", earned her a Best Mellow Video nomination at the 2010 Myx Music Awards- Same issue for all of this. If it's in ref #7, then my bad. That ref is only partially translating for me.
She then became a mentor in the reality talent show Protégé: The Battle for the Big Break (2011)- Ditto as above.
She won the BroadwayWorld Philippines Award for Best Actress in a Musical for the role- Ditto
For the show, she received the BroadwayWorld UK Award for Best Featured Actress in a New Production of a Musical- I don't see this in either of the following two refs.
winning Best Female Performance in a Long-Running West End Show at the BroadwayWorld UK Awards- Ref?
For her performance in the latter, Go won a BroadwayWorld UK Award for Best Actress in a New Production of a Musical. She has since reprised her roles in various productions and tours of Les Misérables (2019–2022) and Hamilton (2023–2024).Needs a ref or refs.
Overall, it seems like a lot of stuff isn't cited in the body of the article, although I'm pretty sure at least some useful refs are in the tables below. -- ZooBlazer 06:37, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Source review: Passed
Review notes:
That's what I've got. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:37, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Promoting. --PresN 01:44, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 12:25, 5 April 2024 (UTC) [33].[reply]
For quite some time I have been working on List of Green Bay Packers starting quarterbacks and at this point I think it meets all of the FL criteria. There are three items I want to pre-emptively bring up in this nomination though, for clarification:
not largely duplicate material from another article.
Structure. It is easy to navigate and includes, where helpful, section headings and table sort facilities.
With all that said, I appreciate any feedback and look forward to addressing any concerns. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 17:07, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Source review: Passed
Source review comments:
A relevant and confusing point from the Packers' media guide that supports the 1950 cutoff: Prior to 1950, most players played both offense and defense... Backs were listed as quarterbacks, halfbacks and fullbacks, but were often interchangeable on offense, especially in Curly Lambeau’s Notre Dame Box system.
It's no secret that it's painful to determine who was the "starting quarterback" and, as you mentioned, oftentimes teams did not have a quarterback start the game. I've found the same issue that Gonzo did when trying to make up similar lists and determine a player's position, but it gets real murky prior to 1950.
Good work Gonzo, I like how the list came together! Hey man im josh (talk) 19:05, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Image review: Passed
Promoting. --PresN 01:45, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 12:25, 5 April 2024 (UTC) [36].[reply]
The Women's World Cup wrapped up a few months ago, but I've had my eye on improving this list for a while and decided to dedicate an evening to doing just that tonight after watching the W Gold Cup. The list's existing elements were all preserved while a substantial amount of prose with good citations was added; most of it was modeled after the list of men's finals, a relatively ancient FL, with some modern tweaks. (This is my second concurrent nomination, but my first has three supports.) SounderBruce 06:05, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Source review: Passed
Other comments:
That's all I've got, good stuff as always SounderBruce! Hey man im josh (talk) 17:52, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Source review passed; promoting. --PresN 01:45, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 12:25, 5 April 2024 (UTC) [37].[reply]
This is my 6th in the NFL team's first-round picks series and, if all goes well, it'll be the 26th list in the series promoted. I will, as always, do my best to respond quickly and address all comments, questions, and criticisms. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:33, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
"have played their home games at AT&T Stadium in Arlington, Texas, since 2009" - don't think that comma is needed– Wouldn't WP:GEOCOMMA apply?
"Dallas traded their 2008 first-, fifth, and seventh-round selections" - shouldn't there by a hyphen after "fifth" as well?– Good catch, fixed and found another instance of this mistake as well. Did a ctrl+F to try to find any other similar mistakes and I think we're good now.
Gotta hand it to you Josh, you've been an absolute machine with these first-round draft pick lists. I should have an image review done in the next couple days! Dylan620 (he/him • talk • edits) 22:51, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
for their 1993 fourth-, eighth, and two second-round selections, which is sort of confusing. What were the fourth and eighth picks? Also are you missing a dash after eighth?
to the Green Bay Packers in exchange for both of their 1993 second-round selections, as well as a fourth- and eighth-round selection in the same year (Nos. 46, 54, 94, and 213 overall).
Promoting. --PresN 01:45, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]