Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Featured log/August 2012

• Clarified, one version on each. GRAPPLE X 00:22, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Images may be better with the "upright" function

  Done, amended the multi-image templates to match. GRAPPLE X 00:22, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• The "writer(s) column looks rather cramped.

  Should I force the width to be greater or how do you think this could be dealt with? GRAPPLE X 00:22, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Why the change from purple to green? The model for the Chrisye song list, List of songs recorded by Rihanna, also used purple, and it may be standard on featured lists of songs

  I had used the green from {{won}} due to its prevalence, but I replaced it with the purple in this edit; let me know which is preferable. GRAPPLE X 00:22, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Please ensure sentences in captions end with a period.

  Done. GRAPPLE X 00:22, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• I did a copyedit, be sure to verify. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:05, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  Looks good, thanks! Thanks for looking at this for me. GRAPPLE X 00:22, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Images:

• File:GG Allin Grave.jpg needs an English description

  Added. GRAPPLE X 00:43, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• File:BrixtonAcademy.jpg needs an information box and English description

  Added. GRAPPLE X 00:43, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• File:Faith No More - Flickr - p a h (9).jpg could use a crop
• File:Cuba Gooding Jr. 2012.jpg could use a bit of editing to remove the lady

Otherwise, all clear. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:25, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

For the latter two, should I upload them as separate files or as new versions of the existing ones? GRAPPLE X 00:43, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• I think Commons prefers them separate — Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:08, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Hudson now replaced with File:Jon Hudson crop.png; working on Gooding now. Let me know if that upload looks okay. GRAPPLE X 01:17, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Yeah, that's fine. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:23, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• File:Cuba Gooding Jr. 2012 (crop).png uploaded now too. GRAPPLE X 01:34, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Looks a little off centre. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 03:26, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Try it now. GRAPPLE X 03:32, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Yeah, that's better. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 03:34, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• San Francisco-based band Faith No More → Faith No More, a San Francisco-based band

  Done. GRAPPLE X 00:43, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Unlink San Franciso per WP:OVERLINK

  Done. GRAPPLE X 00:43, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• "under the name" → "as"

  Done. GRAPPLE X 00:43, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Write out the full names for those writers

  It's already been raised above that the column is cramped, I don't know if full names is going to help that. I did gain a bit of white space by converting the images to upright 170px width so I can try it to see though. GRAPPLE X 00:43, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• "List of" is unneeded. I mean, we do already knno that this is a list

  I disagree, it's still standard practice to include "list of" in most list titles. GRAPPLE X 00:43, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• WP:DASH problems are in many references, mainly those Allmusic references, and a few others

  I see Crisco already saw to that one. GRAPPLE X 00:43, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Categories should be in alphabetical order.

  Done. GRAPPLE X 00:43, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That's all for me. Great work on the list, looks like you put a lot of effort into it. TBrandley 00:23, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Would remove hyphen on 'already-written' as I'm certain it isn't appropriate in this use
• Where is the work for Ref 7?
• Full stop should be removed on 'Ref(s)' heading in the table Lemonade51 (talk) 21:02, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  Sorted; thanks for your comments. GRAPPLE X 21:09, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• I'd change the column header Album to Release or something, as obviously some of them are not albums.
• Songs and albums that begin with "The" or "A" need to sort under their second word.
• Similarly, releases in the Album column with quotation marks need to sort under their first letter.
• I think the normal convention is for titles of double A-sides to be separated by spaces, i.e. Quiet in Heaven/Song of Liberty -> "Quiet in Heaven" / "Song of Liberty"
• Either pictured [year] or pictured in [year]. Personally, I prefer the latter, but it's up to you.
• WP:ISBN suggests using the 13-digit ISBN if available, which, for the two books you've listed, would be 978-1-898141-15-0 and 978-1-906002-01-5.
• As a website, I don't think Allmusic needs to be italicised.
• I also don't think the photographs of Keanu Reeves, Alex Winters, Emilio Estevez or Cuba Gooding Jr are entirely necessary – their connection to the list is only very tangential.
• In the last sentence of the first paragraph and the first sentence of the second, you slip into the conditional tense, i.e. "would become" rather than "became", and "would leave" rather than "left". I found this a little jarring on my first read-through.

Once these issues are resolved, I'd be happy to support. Incidentally, I've got my own FLC: List of songs recorded by Guillemots. If you have the time, I welcome any comments on it. Thanks very much! A Thousand Doors (talk | contribs) 15:27, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I think I've addressed all of these now. I'll look in a little bit to find something more relevant to replace the actors' images; and although I had been leaning towards "already-written" being correct I think another opinion might be a good idea to settle it cleanly. Thanks for your comments, they've been really helpful (especially the sort stuff, I'll need to remember that as I have a larger one of these planned). GRAPPLE X 13:32, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good, just "A Small Victory", "The World Is Yours" and The Real Thing need to resorted, and the caption for the Roddy Bottum image is now missing an in. Also, is there any particular reason why Jim Martin's name is spelt out in full, but the Gibb brothers only have their first initial? A Thousand Doors (talk | contribs) 10:21, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• You could briefly explain what type of "band" FNM are.

  I could but it wouldn't be brief; they change genre from song to song quite often. In addition; most of their album articles suffer from frequent genre warrior edit wars so I'm not really keen on introducing an element to be warred over. GRAPPLE X 21:09, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Allrovi -> AllRovi.

  Done. GRAPPLE X 21:09, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• "including the single "This Town Ain't Big Enough for Both of Us".[12]..." that, according to our article, was the lead track on a 1974 album, 7 years before FNM founded?

  This Town Ain't Big Enough for Both of Us#Cover versions; the song was re-recorded by Sparks and Faith No More on the 1997 album Plagiarism, which featured several of the former band's older songs being re-recorded. GRAPPLE X 21:09, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• When you have "Writer(s)" should that be "Credited as writer(s)"?

  Changed for now, but List of songs recorded by Chrisye et al just use "Writer(s)". GRAPPLE X 21:09, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Not sure if it's entirely logical to have it listed in chronological order when the first column is the name of the song...

  I'll start ordering by song title if that's what you think would be better. GRAPPLE X 21:09, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  Ordered by song title now. GRAPPLE X 21:45, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Also not keen on "Notes" then "Footnotes" with "References" as a subset of those. I would just have Notes and References.

  Done. GRAPPLE X 21:09, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Rambling Man (talk) 16:48, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• "The Simpsons is an American animated television sitcom created by Matt Groening that has aired on the Fox Broadcasting Company network since December 1989" re-write to: "The Simpsons is an American animated television sitcom created by Matt Groening for the Fox Broadcasting Company, which premiered on December 17, 1989"
  • No, the first sentence is better. Your sentence implies that the Fox Broadcasting Company premiered on December 17, 1989. Theleftorium ^(talk) 19:29, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Link The Simpsons in "History". That's the first mention of it in the real article
• Link Fox Broadcasting Company in "History".
• Link Matt Groening in "History"
• Link "show's writers" to List of writers of The Simpsons
• Link Billboard in "History"
• Link The Simpsons Sing the Blues for the first time in "History"
• Link those countries in "History"
  • Countries should not be linked. Theleftorium ^(talk) 19:29, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Various other linking issues for "History"
• Any reference for "The Yellow Album", "Go Simpsonic with The Simpsons", "The Simpsons Movie: The Music", "The Simpsons: Testify"
  • Can you be more specific? Theleftorium ^(talk) 19:29, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    • Oh, that's okay. I see another reference there. TBrandley 02:20, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Referencing issues for "Albums" and "Singles"
  • Can you be more specific? Theleftorium ^(talk) 19:29, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oh, that's okay. I see another reference there. TBrandley 02:20, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Order those categories in alphabetical order please
  • Done! Theleftorium ^(talk) 19:29, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

TBrandley 19:13, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Linking, links are only required once. All the things you suggested are linked in the lead. Theleftorium ^(talk) 19:29, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • (talk page stalker) The LEAD is separate from the body of the article. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 19:39, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    • I know that. But Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Linking says that links in the body are not required if they are linked in the lead. I've added them now anyway to please you guys. Theleftorium ^(talk) 19:47, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• I agree with TBrandley and Theleftorium, the history section should remain, as is stated this is not a conventional discography, so it should remain.
• The main is that tables do not follow WP:DISCOGSTYLE, and therefore do not meet MOS:DTT and WP:ACCESS, this is the most pressing issue
  • Terribly sorry, I didn't realize the tables were out of date. Should be fixed now! Theleftorium ^(talk) 17:44, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• "have ever managed a longer run at that position there." think this could be tighter perhaps "have managed a longer run"
  • Done! Theleftorium ^(talk) 17:44, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• "that features" -> "that featured"
  • Done! Theleftorium ^(talk) 17:44, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• "and as result it was not released" comma after it as well
  • Not quite sure I understand what you mean. I made a change in the article but I don't know if that's what you meant. Theleftorium ^(talk) 17:44, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• "It contains" -> It contained
  • Done! Theleftorium ^(talk) 17:44, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• "intended" ->intend
  • Done! Theleftorium ^(talk) 17:44, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• For the Allmusic refs the publisher (Rovi Corporation) needs to be added
  • Done! Theleftorium ^(talk) 17:44, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

NapHit (talk) 14:57, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review! :) Theleftorium ^(talk) 17:44, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• "Alf Clausen works as the composer for The Simpsons, co-writing, arranging, producing, and conducting almost all music that is used on the show. Much of his work was included on Songs in the Key of Springfield." reads very jolty. How about "The album featured much of the work of the show's composer Alf Clausen, who has co-written, arranged, produced, and conducted all music that is used on the show."
  • Done! Theleftorium ^(talk) 10:11, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• After "It reached number one on the singles charts in Australia, Ireland, New Zealand, Norway, and the United Kingdom" - That's a ton of refs. Can they be combined somehow?
  • I removed the refs for New Zealand and Norway, as those chart positions are verified by the Australian source (see [3]). I hope three refs in a row are okay because I don't think there's anything else that can be done. Theleftorium ^(talk) 10:11, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• "quickly wanted to produce a follow-up album" - "wanted to quickly produce a follow-up album" or something similar. Was his wanting quick, or did he want the production to be quick?
  • I removed the word as it's not needed. Theleftorium ^(talk) 10:11, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• "and latest album" - That should be avoided per WP:DATED unless you use "as of"
  • Fixed! Theleftorium ^(talk) 10:11, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• After "was popular and appeared on the singles charts in several countries, reaching number three in Ireland, eight in New Zealand, 14 in Norway, 23 in the United Kingdom, and 53 in Sweden." also has a pile-up, as does "became a top-twenty hit in Ireland and the United Kingdom."
  • I removed the refs for Norway and Sweden, as those chart positions are verified by the New Zealand source (see [4]). I hope three refs in a row are okay because I don't think there's anything else that can be done. That last sentence you mentioned has been reduced to two refs. Theleftorium ^(talk) 10:11, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• That's it from me. Images look fine. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 06:00, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thanks a lot for the review! Theleftorium ^(talk) 10:11, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• "...when after the ..." would expect a comma after "when" here.
  • Done! Theleftorium ^(talk) 14:45, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• "got the idea " reads clumsily to me.
  • Hmm, any suggestions? Would "came up with the idea" be better? Theleftorium ^(talk) 14:45, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Couldn't it just be something like "decided to..."? The Rambling Man (talk) 16:09, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    • Sure, fixed! Theleftorium ^(talk) 17:07, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Where are the release dates referenced, and for which country/countries are they applicable?
  • The release dates are referenced in the text by ref #2, 17, 16, 21, and 24, do I need to add them to the tables? They are the American release dates, you want me to note that in the tables? Theleftorium ^(talk) 14:45, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    • Yes, sorry that you're the guinea pig here, but it just struck me while reviewing this discog that we never actually say where the release date is pertinent to... The Rambling Man (talk) 16:09, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    • Heh, no worries! I've added the refs and the country to the tables now. Theleftorium ^(talk) 17:07, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Can you give the tables unique captions, e.g. "List of studio albums, with selected chart positions and certifications"?
  • Done! Theleftorium ^(talk) 14:45, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Rambling Man (talk) 11:36, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• "Steve Waugh is a former Australian cricketer and captain." should expand to say former captain of Australian cricket team, just saying he was a former makes no sense
  • Changed it to "Steve Waugh is a former cricketer and captain of the Australia cricket team" —Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 06:31, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• refs should come after punctuation, ref 3 currently does not
  • Done —Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 06:31, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• "away his wicket easily and is someone who valued his wicket", comma should be a full stop
  • I think you should read the sentence once more. —Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 17:20, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• "He was named as a Indian Cricket Cricketer..."
  • Done —Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 06:31, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• we have ten and 10 in close succession, be consistent, should really be in digits above 9
  • Done —Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 06:31, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Srilanka -> Sri Lanka
  • Done —Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 06:31, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• "2003-04 series against India" hyphen should be an en dash
  • Done —Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 06:31, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Table is formatted strangely we have all figures aligned centrally except the score column which is not, be consistent.
  • Done —Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 06:31, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Country, venue and date column should be aligned to the left, looks untidy aligned centrally
  • Done —Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 06:31, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• I don't see the point in the I/N column, can't see how it can be referenced either
  • As I already said the list was modeled based on Mohammad Yousuf's list where M/N was included in a separate column. I feel Innings played by a cricketer is a proper representation rather than Matches played. The reference for that column would be the Innings by innings list from ESPNcricinfo —Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 06:31, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You also say the Sangakkara list is a model and that list does not have that column. Remember Wikipedia is not a statistics website, as far as I can see this is information that does not add anything to the table, and is irrelevant information. NapHit (talk) 13:11, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I never said this was solely based upon the Sangakkara list. Both the lists are different in some aspects. If wikipedia is not a statistics website then why do we have articles on List of records that too some of them being FLs. Anyway I've removed that since it bothered you. —Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 17:20, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I understand its solely based on one list, but regardless the information was not needed. Records are notable, such as centuries, what is not notable are some of the stats that accompany the notable record, in this case the number of innings. NapHit (talk) 21:09, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Should have a separate column for refs
  • Why should refs have a separate column. Is there a reason for it.—Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 06:31, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It makes the table look neat for a start. As they all at the end of the table anyway, they should be in a separate column. NapHit (talk) 13:11, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done. —Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 17:20, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The column should be unsortable. NapHit (talk) 21:09, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Forgot that! Fixed. —Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 06:33, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Why do you have B/F and S/R in ODI table but not test column? I would remove these columns
  • In Test cricket balls faced really doesn't matter, where as in limited–overs cricket it's a prominent figure. Other similar lists doesn't have balls faced in the Test centuries table. —Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 06:31, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

They also don't have it in the ODI table either, most have S/R but not B/F, I'm not convinced its needed.

NapHit (talk) 13:11, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

What if someone wants to know the "balls faced". The Mohammad Yousuf list has the column and as I said earlier this article was modeled based on that. I don't have problems removing the S/R, but I don't think it makes sense if we remove the "Balls faced" column altogether. —Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 17:20, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Just because one list has the column doesn't mean its needed, not convinced by your argument that its more important in ODI than test, why is that? Surely its relevant to both? Anyway you've not adequately explained why the column should remain, people wanting to know is not a reason. Still think it should be removed, just stats overload as far as I'm concerned. NapHit (talk) 21:09, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In Test cricket balls faced doesn't really matter. You could see many Test matches where Balls faced was not recorded before some 30-40 years. That's not the case with ODIs. I see S/R in almost every century list in the ODI table. So what's harm in having S/R in ODI table. —Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 06:33, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Read the strike rate article, it seems more relevant to ODI, so happy for that to remain. NapHit (talk) 15:23, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Key should be arranged in order of columns in the table, so test should come after Inn. instead of before Pos.
  • Done —Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 06:31, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• A number of refs have hyphens when they should be en dashes, nearly every ref from 26 onwards
  • Done —Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 06:31, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ref 57 still has a hyphen. NapHit (talk) 13:11, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. —Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 17:20, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

NapHit (talk) 17:16, 5 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• " Middle–order batsman" no need for M and hyphen, not en-dash here.
• You link middle order batsman, but not right-arm medium bowler in the lead.
• "Waugh took Australia " led rather than took.
• "honored" I know in BritEng that should be honoured. What about AusEng?
• "Test–playing" hyphen, not en-dash.
• " a Guinness record" just say a world record.
• "Waugh's position is seventh in the list" -> "Waugh is seventh..."
• "for Australia over a period of nineteen years" -> "for Australia for nineteen years".
• Ref 24, for instance, en-dash needed.
• Ref 25, for instance, publisher needed.

The Rambling Man (talk) 19:38, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed all. —Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 20:01, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• In the tables, debold the headers per WP:MOSBOLD
• Align references to the center in the tables
• Categories should be sorted in alphabetical order

TBrandley 19:34, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Fixed all. —Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 10:18, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• "He was named as Indian Cricket Cricketer of the year in 1988". Capitalize "year"?
  • Done —Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 10:18, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• "Waugh made his Test debut against India on December 1985". Unless a more precise date is given, "on" should be "in".
  • Done —Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 10:18, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Should "International" be capitalized in "Waugh retired from International cricket"?
  • Done —Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 10:18, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Could remove List of from the two section headers, since it's obvious they're lists.
  • Done —Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 10:18, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    • Not done. I still see them. All you did was remove the table captions, which were helpful and should be restored. I meant the section titles themselves. Giants2008 (Talk) 20:05, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• What is intended to be sourcing the first note? Giants2008 (Talk) 01:22, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Do you think it's unnecessary. —Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 10:18, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• I think sourcing the note would help. That's why I brought it up. Giants2008 (Talk) 20:05, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• I think I've addressed both the comments. —Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 06:32, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• • "cricket cricketing captains" - jawbreaker; could be just cricket captains
  • "He was named as Indian Cricket Cricketer of the Year in 1988, and Wisden Cricketer of the Year the next year.[10][11]" - to avoid repetition, perhaps: "He was named Cricketer of the Year in 1988 by Indian Cricket, and a year later by Wisden."
  • "In January 2010, the ICC honoured him by inducting him into the ICC Cricket Hall of Fame.[12]" - perhaps just write: "the ICC inducted him into the..."
  • "In Test matches, Waugh has scored centuries against all Test cricket playing nations, and is the second player to do so.[15][N 1]" - no need for "and is"
  • Man of the Match is a proper noun, therefore should be capitalized
  • That is all. Regards.--Kürbis (✔) 17:08, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    • Fixed all. Thanks for stepping in. —Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 18:04, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Minor, but a comma would be nice after Deccan Chargers in the second paragraph. done
• Also, I wish the repetition in "His score of 119, scored..." could be fixed by changing one of the "score"s. done
• "but only the records of their games for the DD are given." Don't think the second "the" should be there, especially as it's not used in other similar cases earlier. done
• Not sure the photo gallery at the start of the Players section is helpful. Usually we discourage galleries at FLC or FAC.

• There are many FLs with such galleries, and they provide statistics which are helpful. Also they have alt text, so including them doesn't costs much. :)

• Something appears off in the table in Rajat Bhatia's bowling average column. done
• Again minor, but the semi-colon in footnote 1 could just be a comma instead. done
• I don't do this often, but I'd recommend having reference 4 archived as soon as can be done. The AFP links from Google go dead very quickly, and archiving it now will save the trouble of finding a replacement later. This isn't really a requirement for FL status, just some advice to prevent future difficulties. Giants2008 (Talk) 00:28, 9 August 2012 (UTC) done Changed it to Yahoo! link.[reply]

• Thanks a lot for your comments. :) ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ ^{Talk Email} 07:59, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• "one of the participating team of the" teams. In fact, "one of the teams participating in the ..." would be better still.
• "They played ..." vs "DD has reached ..." plural vs singular. Be consistent.
• thrice -> three times.
• " In total, 54 players have appeared in Twenty20 cricket for DD" - do DD play any other form of cricket than T20?
• "69 since his first match in 2008." -> perhaps "69 since his debut for the franchise in 2008"?
• "aggregating 2013 runs" reads odd. Scoring would be better.
• "and Kevin Pietersen has scored" -> have scored.
• Consider linking "run".
• "and is listed alphabetically" initially perhaps, but it's sortable.
• Don't like that gallery at all, why not just place them down the right-hand side of the table?
• And a caption with "has balled the" really proves the need for a copyedit.
• Morne Morkel has a diacritic missing.
• As does Moines.
• No need for a No. column when it's meaningless, just sort alphabetically by name.
• "T20I captains" are you sure these are T20I?!
• You should add a "accurate as of" note since the Champions League is in a couple of months...

The Rambling Man (talk) 17:16, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• done all. You may like to review your !vote now. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ ^{Talk Email} 09:14, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• "scoring 2013 runs" would change to 2,013 runs, just so no thinks it refers to the year
• "seventeen runs" 17 should really be in digits for consistently with other figures, especially as we have 13 in digits
• Think Inn should come under Batting in the table and Balls under Bowling as well, ca should also be under Fielding
• Would move the IPL portal banner as it obscuring an edit button

NapHit (talk) 16:18, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• done all. :) Hindustan ^{Zinda bad} 16:24, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Link playoff

• done

• After the first occurrence, you've entirely used DD for "Delhi Daredevils". Why the players table caption alone reads "Delhi Daredevils cricketers". Be consistent

• done

• Any reason for cite killing ref #3. I think you should go for it only when more than three different (types) sources are used

• How is that "cite killing"?

• I said no need to cite kill that. Go for the normal method —Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 07:58, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• done

• When sorting the batting average by ascending order, dashes should occupy the bottom of the table

• Dashes should come at last. Its a general practice.

• Nope, a player who hasn't been dismissed in any of the innings that he has played has a batter average (statistically) than others. See List of India Twenty20 International cricketers for sorting —Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 07:58, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• done

• Any special reason for including Pathan's image. Also the text in the caption "next to Morkel who has bowled one ball more" is not really required as it adds little encyclopedic value

• done

• The batting averages of Doug Bracewell and Roelof van der Merwe are statistically better than KP's. So its better to add a note which defines the minimum criteria (like balls faced or runs scored) like what you did for bowling average
  

• No, because batting average doesn't apply to Bracewell and Merwe.

• Add a note —Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 07:58, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• done

—Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 18:03, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the comments. :) ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ ^{Talk Email} 06:45, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

All your comments have been addressed now. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ ^{Talk Email} 17:56, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• • "Sehwag is DD's leading run-scorer, scoring 2,013 runs.[8] " - perhaps change to active: The leading run-scorer of DD is Sewag, who scored 2,013 runs." to avoid the odd "run - scorer - scored - runs"
  • "which is the highest score by a DD batsman" - confusing; you stated that he scored 2,013; perhaps you mean the highest score in one game?
  • "while he has also made the highest number of stumpings: 13.[14]" - while also making the...
  • "The first list includes all players who have played at least one match" - should this be "in at least"?
  • Regards.--Kürbis (✔) 17:20, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    • Done all :) ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ ^{Talk Email} 06:59, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Netflix.com should just Neflix
  • Done, TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 19:06, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• U.S. ratings should Nielsen ratings
  • Done, TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 19:06, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Add "specials" and "webisodes" to the series overview table
  • Not necessarily, per List of Lost episodes, a featured list. Jonathan Harold Koszeghi (talk) 13:48, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    • Per Jonathan, not done. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 19:06, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Why is there a [ in Ref. 37
  • Fixed, and I also fixed a few others with the same problem. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 19:06, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

TBrandley 19:48, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'll address those ASAP; as a matter of disclosure, TBrandley was the peer reviewer. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 19:53, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

All the above issues are done; I hope you can support. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 19:06, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Any reason why the lead image does not have a thumb and description?
  • Done
• No production codes available?
  • There is no WP:RS available for the codes. Sorry :( TBrandley 01:27, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Is it appropriate to have three external links which more or less cover the same thing? Consider WP:ELNO.
  • No, see List of Awake episodes, a recently promoted FL, and various others.. Thanks. Oh, and also, epguides should be kept as it contains production codes not seen in any other external links. TBrandley 01:27, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Lemonade51 (talk) 23:38, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have addressed all of the issues that can be fixed; others are noted. Thanks for reviewing! TBrandley 01:27, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for taking care of the above issues TBrandley. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 02:14, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. I'm happy to! TBrandley 05:37, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Would spell out EST on first use, readers not in the USA, may not be aware what it refers to, probably link it as well
  • Done
• "On May 11, 2012, the series was renewed for a twenty-four episode ninth season, which is scheduled to premiere on September 27." could do with a ref
  • Since its below in the actual article, it is not needed.
• Some references have Medianet American Broadcasting Company, while others have ABC Medianet, be consistent, all should be the same
  • Done. Though it may take time to show on the table on this list
    • It's done. I fixed it originally but some user accidentally reverted it. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 17:53, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• ref 33, 36, 39 hyphen should be an en dash
  • Done
• As far as I'm aware IMDB is not considered a reliable source, so probably best to replace those refs
  • As explained in a peer review, "the source is not verifying an extraordinary claim, but merely the existence of these specials. If you search the title of the specials, they pop up on IMDb, TV.com, YouTube, blogs, etc. So clearly, they are real. The task was picking which out of those was the most-reliable, so I thought IMDb was." I'll leave this up to the original nominator though.
    • I think it is reliable in this case; IMDb and TV.com both show the same information, so clearly it is true. Besides, titles and credits are written by the editorial staff—it's not user-submitted. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 17:53, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• title image could do with alt text
  • Done
• I see another user mentioned but we really don't need four external links, should really be no more than two
  • I'll leave this to the original nominatior
    • I reduced the external links to two. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 17:53, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

NapHit (talk) 21:36, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have addressed all of the issues that I could fix. Thanks for reviewing! TBrandley 17:26, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for taking care of the above issues again TBrandley. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 17:39, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• series overview table does not MOS:DTT, need to add row and colscopes to ensure it does
  • Done

I still don't see any col or row scopes in that table. NapHit (talk) 18:40, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm very unfamiliar with table styling. I hate to ask, but could you explain how to do it? TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 18:42, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Not to worry, I've done it anyway. NapHit (talk) 17:50, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Why aren't similar columns the same width from section to section? It looks messy right now.
  • It is set on auto-width. This is so that seasons with short titles do not have big gaps. Would you still like it to be changed? TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 23:21, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    • Fixing the widths would look tidier. The Rambling Man (talk) 08:16, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
      • Done; column widths standardized. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 17:38, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Tables could use captions per WP:ACCESS.
  • I don't know what that means; can you explain? TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 23:21, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    • Check MOS:DTT, it should explain to you how to add "captions" to tables to help with accessibility. The Rambling Man (talk) 08:16, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
      • Done. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 17:38, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• "series has aired eight seasons" reads odd to me, I would expect it be active, i.e. "The series has aired for eight seasons"...
  • Done. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 23:21, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• You already abbreviated ABC so why have all that "American Broadcasting Corporation" in the refs?
  • Is it necessary to change? They are all consistent throughout the citation section. However, if you feel it is necessary, let me know. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 23:21, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• What make JB Hi-Fi's online store a reliable source?
  • It is really the most reliable source I could find for region four release dates. It's also used in List of Lost episodes and List of Family Guy episodes; two FLs. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 23:21, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    • It may the best you can find, but can you demonstrate how it meets WP:RS? The Rambling Man (talk) 08:16, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
      • I replaced all the JBHiFi sources, with EzyDVD ones (Australia's largest online and off-line specialist DVD retailer). TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 17:38, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Date ranges in titles for some of those Amazon links need en-dashes, not unspaced hyphens.
  • I don't know which sources you are referring to. The only Amazon sources are DVD release dates, and those are all spaced en-dashes. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 23:21, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    • My mistake, I meant the Medianet ones, refs 17, 20, 23 etc etc. The Rambling Man (talk) 08:16, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
      • Done. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 17:38, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Rambling Man (talk) 18:28, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• The prose needs some copy-editing.
• The first para could do better with the stats, instead of opinions. Both would anyway go in his side. :)
  • The first para always introduce the article.
    • But add some more stats. I can't even in his rank in the century scorers. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ ^{Talk Email} 12:22, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
      • Adding more to the first para would be excessive. The rank is alawys given at the end, in this case I've already put his Test in the related para. Zia Khan 12:55, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
        • Added his position at the end. Zia Khan 13:22, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Why not move the stadium pic to the key section. It will save some space.
  • Done.
• Category:Test cricket records is not applicable here.
  • Why not? 25 centuries, 329 runs in innings, century in 100th Test, etc. are Test cricket records.
    • But there are ODI 100s too. Also 100s list is a stat, not a record. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ ^{Talk Email} 12:22, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
      • I think all the 100s list include this category. Zia Khan 12:55, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
        • Then Category:One Day International cricket records is also applicable. What I could suggest is, Category:Cricket records and statistics is the best choice. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ ^{Talk Email} 13:00, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
          • Done. Zia Khan 13:24, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• I might be getting a lot demanding, but I think you could add "List of centuries by opponent" and "List of centuries by year", similar to what has been done at the 100s list for the god himself.
  • I think these things are unnecesary and also I've already said that the list is based upon existing FLs, Yousuf and Sangakkara.
    • Ok then, I would not press much hard on that. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ ^{Talk Email} 12:22, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Add a key for ref, or merge the ref with the result.
  • Is this really important to add a key for this?
    • Most of our readers would need that. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ ^{Talk Email} 12:22, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
      • Done. Zia Khan 12:55, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• There is no mention of Faisalabad and Karachi in the lead, where he scored the most 100s, 3 each.
  • Three centuries at a ground are not as sagnificant as this: "Inzamam scored Test centuries at 18 cricket grounds, including 13 at venues outside Pakistan."
    • Fine. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ ^{Talk Email} 12:22, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Good work overall. :) ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ ^{Talk Email} 10:25, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Thanks for the comments. Zia Khan 11:08, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• "His first Test century came a year later against West Indies..." should be "against the West Indies..." there is another one further down the article as well
  • Done.
• "His score of 329, made against New Zealand..."
  • Done.
• no need to ref 9 just twice in same sentence, just use it once at the end of the sentence
  • Fixed.
• "In ODI matches, Inzamam is fourth in the all time list of highest run scorers in an ODI career, with 11739 runs from 378 matches..." in an ODI career is redundant already established we are talking about ODI
  • Fixed.
• "a position which he shares..."
  • Done.
• Don't need ref in the key, clear what that column is for
  • This was suggested by Vaibhav Jain. Any way, I've removed this.
• Is that key description for Date correct? To me it infers the day the match between the teams started, shouldn't it be the date Inzamam scored the century?
  • I think this is more suitable because dates only coincide ODI centuries. It may take two different dates to achieve a Test century.

Source seems to list start date, as day match started so not a problem, just wanted to clear that up. NapHit (talk) 18:04, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

NapHit (talk) 15:15, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the comments. Zia Khan 16:40, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Caption "most number of centuries" - no need for "number of".
  • Done.
• "and made 8820 runs" would prefer "scored".
  • Done.
• I would also prefer to see 8,820 and thence 11,739...
  • Done.
• "at Edgbaston Cricket Ground," I would pipelink that to just Edgbaston.
  • Done.
• "at Antigua Recreation Ground," at the Antigua...? Similar comment applies to other Grounds. (Look at the caption you've written, for example, ".. at the Gaddafi Stadium, ...")
  • Done.
• Four paras in the lead is perhaps a little too much, the list isn't that long.
  • Removed some text and merged 3rd and 4th para.
• Ref 20 doesn't need "Pakistan records" in the title.
  • Fixed.
• M in M Chimmaswamy has a full stop after it.
  • Fixed. Zia Khan 15:52, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Rambling Man (talk) 11:46, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• 8,820 runs in Tests, why not 11,739 runs?
  • He scored 11,739 in ODIs not in Tests.
    • I meant the comma which was not there in 11739 —Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 16:03, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• "BBC in 2005", year is not required
  • Removed.
• Edgbaston -> Edgbaston Cricket Ground
  • It is suggested by The Rambling Man, see his comment above.
    • Any reason for it. Except this you have specifically used the ground names for all others —Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 16:03, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
      • Edgbaston Cricket Ground is commonly known as Edgbaston, Birmingham. Zia Khan 21:09, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
        • Edgbaston is the name of a locality in Birmingham —Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 04:53, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• 11,739 runs from 378 matches in the third para is repetitive
  • Fixed.
• "he is thirteenth in the overall list of most hundreds in a Test career" -> most hundreds in a Test cricket (or Tests)
  • Done.
• "2006 series between the teams" -> 2006 series between the two teams
  • Done.
• "He made 11 not out in the match". This fact is not required. A mention of this can be meaningful only if his highest score is close to hundred. You can directly say something like he never made a hundred in T20I
  • Done.
• "a position he shares with Sunil Gavaskar, Viv Richards, Herschelle Gibbs, Desmond Haynes, Steve Waugh and Chris Gayle". This can be included under a FN
  • Done.
    • Inzamam shares the position he with... —Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 16:06, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
      • Fixed. Zia Khan 21:09, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• While sorting the score column in descending order, 112 off 109 balls should sort before 112 off 163 balls
  • Fixed.
• The cricinfo link at the EL shouldn't be there, since it's already used as a ref
  • Removed. Zia Khan 14:02, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    

—Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 06:36, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• This was the thirteenth Summer Paralympic Games - The subject of the first sentence was "medal table". Don't think the table was the thirteenth Summer Paralympics
• "2012 Summer Olympics" - Similar to medals for games which hadn't happened yet?
• 76 countries - You say "NPCs" earlier. Used interchangeably? If so, may need to be noted.
• "Hosts China" - Hosts?
• The one wide image casts a lot of white space in the article.
• What's the copyright on the underlying work at File:2008 Summer Paralympics Gold Medal.jpg? Probably still copyrighted.
• Other images look okay.
• On 14 September 2008, Rebecca Chin was stripped of the silver medal she had won in the F37-38 discus competition after the IPC overruled a change in her classification made earlier in the month making her ineligible to have won the medal as she became a F44 competitor instead. - Way too long, needs to be split. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:48, 5 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• I did a copyedit, be sure to check. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:46, 5 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Thanks for the review, I made the modifications as noted (changing those two countries to NPCs as they should be) - that 2012 one was a rather daft typo on my part! File:2008 Summer Paralympics Gold Medal.jpg is a cropped version of File:Andreas Vevera Wien2008.jpg. Miyagawa (talk) 18:13, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• The medal image is a derivative work of the medal itself, as well. That medal may be (probably is) still under copyright. The original image (of Vevera) is probably okay because of de minimis, but the zoom-in of the medal... BTW, you have "nation" in the "Changes in medal standings" table. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:56, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Other issues have been addressed satisfactorily. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:01, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• I've replaced the image in question with a different fair use image showing all three medal types. Miyagawa (talk) 20:04, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• People's republic of China shouldn't be linked per WP:OVERLINK
• Changes in medal standings table does not meet MOS:DTT

NapHit (talk) 15:35, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree on the first comment China at the Games has been linked twice (same as GB and Australia) and People's Republic of China has been linked once. Afro (Talk) 10:12, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

From WP:OVERLINK, "Avoid linking the names of major geographic features and locations, languages, religions, and common professions." Therefore it should not be linked, it doesn't link to the article on China at the games but China itself. NapHit (talk) 13:38, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"An article is said to be overlinked if it contains an excessive number of links" How is one or two links excessive in anyway? Afro (Talk) 13:58, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's more the point that, like we don't link "United States of America" (massive, obvious geographical entity), we don't need to link China for the same reason. The Rambling Man (talk) 17:49, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

What TRM said, the guideline is quite clear I'm not sure how you can dispute it. NapHit (talk) 21:42, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed the link as suggested. Miyagawa (talk) 18:58, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• "débuts" no need for accent.

• Changed as noted. Miyagawa (talk) 18:58, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• "was similar to that of the" -> " was similar to those awarded in the "

• Changed as noted. Miyagawa (talk) 18:58, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Why not tell me what sports the individual multiple winners participated in?

• Added - had to do a bit of a modification to the wording as two of the athletes were from the same sport. Miyagawa (talk) 18:58, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Don't think you need the "see also" for Olympic medal table, you could just incorporate that link in the prose before the table, e.g. "The ranking in this Olympic medal table is based..."

• Its a link to the 2008 Summer Olympics medal table rather than Olympic medal table (unless someone else came in and removed Olympic medal table!) Miyagawa (talk) 18:58, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• "Dias" picture, is that centre left or actual far left?

• Changed to center left (taking care not to use my English English!) Miyagawa (talk) 18:58, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Sorting by Gold multiple times results in multiple sorts, there should just be two orders.
• Same for silver, bronze and total. (btw, I'm using Safari).
• "Changes in medal standings" table doesn't appear to be using the header properly.
• General ref needs a publisher.

• Added, and added it to the other BBC inline citation. Miyagawa (talk) 18:58, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Avoid the use of the semi-colon for the bold effect, it's not got for WP:ACCESS.

• I've changed it to subsections for References and Notes. Miyagawa (talk) 18:58, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• What is ref 8? Online? Magazine?

• Dunno what happened there - I must have forgotten to paste the url into the template. Haven't done that in a while! Miyagawa (talk) 18:58, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Second external link has a typo.

• Fixed the typo. Miyagawa (talk) 18:58, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Rambling Man (talk) 17:49, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• In singles, As a solo artist is not needed as it is the primary table and thus has all non-featured, non-promotional singles. It might also confuse some readers into thinking Clarkson was part of a band or group.

1. done Woofygoodbird (talk) 12

   48, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

• While it isn't required, discography tables are allowed to show positions for charts that are not the main chart for the country - as such, 'collaborations' could have the charting positions on the US Country chart, where "Because of You" hit No. 2 and "Don't You Wanna Stay" hit No. 1. Once again, not required but it might give more context into the songs' success.

1. I didn't put it yet because those songs already charted at the main chart and might trigger some other editors to assert that she's not a country artist and their country music discography guidelines don't apply to her. (See Talk:Kelly_Clarkson_discography#"Because of You (remix)") But if you insist, it's okay to me. Woofygoodbird (talk) 12

   48, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

• "Other charted songs" needs to note that the 118 peak for "If I Can't Have You" was on the Bubbling Under Hot 100 Chart, not the Hot 100. This could be done with a footnote saying something like ""If I Can't Have You" peaked at number 18 on the Bubbling Under Hot 100 Singles Chart, which ranks the top 25 songs that have not yet entered the Billboard Hot 100.

1. done Woofygoodbird (talk) 12

   48, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

• Citation 6 should be a note, not a reference, as it is not directly referencing anything.

1. done Woofygoodbird (talk) 12

   48, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

• Citation 30 'Billboard' should be italicized, 'Hot 100' should not. 'under' should be capitalized and should have a space between it and 'Hot'.

1. done Woofygoodbird (talk) 12

   48, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

I'll support this if the issues are fixed. Toa Nidhiki05 20:55, 28 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

As well as everything Toa Nidhiki05 has mentioned, there are some other things I have noticed:

• The Extended plays and Other charted songs tables have no legend at the bottom, even though there are empty cells.

1. done Woofygoodbird (talk) 12

   48, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

• WP:DISCOGSTYLE states that certifications should be listed by provider, not country (for example, US becomes RIAA). See WP:DISCOGSTYLE#Listing certifications for a full list of certification abbreviations and information on making changes.

1. done Woofygoodbird (talk) 12

   48, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

Just a point: the certifications are now no longer in alphabetical order, which they still need to be even if they are listed by provider. They need reordering. Bear in mind, of course, that RIAA should still be at the top, as that is her home country.

I Am Rufus • Conversation is a beautiful thing. 12:59, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'll do this one myself. I Am Rufus • Conversation is a beautiful thing. 16:43, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

And have done it.

• Both Video albums need references to prove that they were released, as they did not chart.

1. done Woofygoodbird (talk) 12

   48, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

• "Cry" and "Go" need references to prove that they were released as singles.

1. done Woofygoodbird (talk) 12

   48, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

• All of the Other appearances need references to prove their existence.

1. done Woofygoodbird (talk) 12

   48, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

• None of the music videos don't have references proving their existence (the notes don't count).

1. done Woofygoodbird (talk) 12

   48, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

Just a point: if you're going to list the director names, you need to make sure that their names are mentioned in the sources you have used. If not, either find an alternate source or leave the cell blank. I Am Rufus • Conversation is a beautiful thing. 12:59, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

1. done all sources for the videos (except Go and One Minute) now mention the names of their respective directors in it. However, I left the director cells for Go and One Minute empty because I can't find an alternative source for it. Woofygoodbird (talk) 16

   32, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

That's fine. I Am Rufus • Conversation is a beautiful thing. 16:43, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Apart from all of these things, this is very impressive. I'll have no reservations supporting if the issues are fixed. I Am Rufus • Conversation is a beautiful thing. 07:46, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]