The list was promoted by Giants2008 via FACBot (talk) 00:27, 1 November 2021 (UTC) [1].[reply]
I am nominating this for featured list because it is comprehensive with sources for each individual entry in addition to general sources, explains the relationship between these two types of numbers, and is illustrated with pictures. Also, this would be just the third current FL of WP:WPM. I combined portions of List of perfect numbers (now histmerged into this article) and Mersenne prime to create this list (in addition to my own work). Please note that this is my first nomination for any type of good/featured content, so it is likely I may have missed one or two things, but I believe it meets all the criteria and may only need minor copyedits. eviolite (talk) 23:13, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Overall, this is a really strong first FL nomination (and a really interesting one!). Just a few comments:
{{math}}
and <math>
– since the fonts are slightly different, try to pick one or the other.
Therefore, the common practice of most members of WikiProject mathematics is the following: Use of {{mvar}} and {{math}} for isolated variables and very simple inline formulas; Use of LaTeX for displayed formulas and more complicated inline formulas. But I do understand that it looks a bit weird.. I've changed the singular use of
<math>
to the {{math}} template. This equation is more complex than the other ones, so it's still a bit awkward, but is it better?<sup>
or {{sup}}
should work in citation titles; try using that instead of "^"
— RunningTiger123 (talk) 00:15, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Looks great! RunningTiger123 (talk) 01:40, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
! class="unsortable" scope=col | Ref
to ! class="unsortable" scope=col | {{abbr|Ref.|References}}
(adding abbreviation).
align=center
. I have done one as an example. Repeat the same in all the reference cells.
'Calendarium ecclesiasticum - BSB Clm 14908'– Needs an endash (–) instead of a normal dash (-)
– Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 06:47, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The list was promoted by Giants2008 via FACBot (talk) 00:26, 1 November 2021 (UTC) [2].[reply]
My life has been pretty busy the last few months, which greatly delayed the next list in my mammal series—not to mention the size of the list. But finally, following up on my 10-list series of Carnivora (carnivorans/felids/canids/mustelids/procyonids/ursids/mephitids/viverrids/herpestids/pinnipeds) comes a third list in Artiodactyla (cervids/suines): the 144 species of Bovidae, covering antelope, cows, gazelle, goats, and sheep. Basically just a ton of non-deer/pig/horse hooved animals in one giant family. This follows the pattern set by the previous 12 lists (and reviewer comments therein), so hopefully it's good to go. Thanks for reviewing! --PresN 15:00, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
"The resized photographs can be freely used on any pages for non commercial, scientific and educational purposes, if you let me know about it first"The image doesn't seem to be licenced under CC 4.0.
Comments from Dank
The list was promoted by Giants2008 via FACBot (talk) 00:26, 1 November 2021 (UTC) [3].[reply]
Koi... Mil Gaya is one of the earliest science fiction films from India, with its star Hrithik Roshan receiving appreciation from the audience, critics, and award groups. The film is also popular in other countries, especially in my country Indonesia. I nominated this list because I believe it is comprehensive enough. --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 07:18, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
it also got→
it also received
— RunningTiger123 (talk) 20:18, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
{{refn}}
be employed instead of bundling refs together? — DaxServer (talk) 07:15, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Doing now. Aza24 (talk) 20:25, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The list was promoted by Giants2008 via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 1 November 2021 (UTC) [5].[reply]
Karishma Kapoor is one of the most famous and widely known actress of Hindi Cinema. Recently, have added refs, re-wrote lead and tried to add all necessary things required to be a FL. All comments welcome. Thank you. 25 CENTS VICTORIOUS 🍁 13:50, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from ~ HAL333 19:55, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
====Comments from HAL====
Just got interrupted... I'll get to the lead soon. ~ HAL333 22:33, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
--25 CENTS VICTORIOUS 🍁 12:23, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
That's all for now. ~ HAL333 16:44, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
|
Source review from Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 06:41, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
;Source review
|
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 18:01, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
*"work in Hindi films" why obfuscate Bollywood? More readers will be familiar with Bollywood than "Hindi films".
That's my first pass. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 19:59, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply] |
The list was promoted by Giants2008 via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 25 October 2021 (UTC) [6].[reply]
Well, here it is folks, it's taken four years and I now present the final list of yearly number-one country songs (until this year ends and I have to try and promote 2021). This will complete a set of 77 articles covering the number-one country songs of every year from 1944 to 2020. The final one covers the year in which Billboard first published the chart currently known as Hot Country Songs. As ever, any and all feedback will be addressed as quickly as humanly possible. -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 21:43, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
– Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 08:24, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
As good as we've come to expect, so just a few things...
That's it. Good work. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 12:06, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comments from Dank
Wow. It's been a while since I've been here but I'm shocked you've kept this up over the years. The best thing I can say is congrats. I'll definitely make sure to support the FT when you nominate that. I'm more than happy to support the final list. Great job to you. – zmbro (talk) 15:57, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:27, 24 October 2021 (UTC) [7].[reply]
Here is one more! I'm happy to keep working on the project of bringing all list of municipalities in Mexico to a high standard (10, nearly 11, states already have their municipality lists featured using this standardized format, along with dozens of other list of municipalities in North America). We have updated the information to reflect the most recent census and tried to incorporate changes from previous nominations. The page should be pretty standardized but there can always be improvements. Thanks to everyone who regularly reviews these lists! Mattximus (talk) 15:35, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comments below. Aza24 (talk) 21:50, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 18:04, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
*"the nineteenth most populated state" and "15th largest by land area spanning" both link to the same article. Done
That's all I have. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 08:37, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply] |
According to the 2020 Mexican Census, it is the nineteenth most populated state with 2,822,255 inhabitants and the 15th largest by land area—Two points here; one is that we're mixing words (nineteenth) with numbers (15th). Either is fine but pick one and use it consistently, either nineteenth and fifteenth or 19th and 15th. Second, it would be useful to have context for these rankings, as it stands it takes clicking through several links to see that this is out of a list of 31 states. Could we either mention that here ("the nineteenth most populated of Mexico's 31 states, with 2,822,255 inhabitants") or earlier (San Luis Potosí is one of the 31 states of Mexico, located in North Central Mexico and divided into 58 municipalities")? Done
The largest municipality by population is San Luis PotosíI would lose the pipe here and retain "City" in the name, as it avoids ambiguity given that the state is linked using the same text. Done
Promoting. --PresN 18:57, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:26, 24 October 2021 (UTC) [11].[reply]
I am nominating this for featured list because it covers the pinnacle of the snooker world rankings. Eleven people have held the number one position in the world since 1976. I welcome any comments. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 22:21, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
{{sronly}}
template.
Those are a few minor concerns from me. – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 06:35, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
That is all what I found during my read through of this list MWright96 (talk) 13:50, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Nothing further from yours truly MWright96 (talk) 20:35, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from 𝄠ʀᴀᴘᴘʟᴇ ꭗ 17:04, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
*I could be wrong on this (PresN might know better?) but I'm sure that the cell colour alone to denote the once-a-year updates is enough for a screenreader; consider adding something like a dagger or asterisk to allow it to be seen by more than just colour alone. I'd also move the key to before rather than after the table but that's not particularly important.
|
Source review passed; promoting. --PresN 18:58, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:26, 24 October 2021 (UTC) [12].[reply]
I am nominating this for featured list because I believe it meets the FL-criteria. The article has been edited to contain the same qualities as other Fls, including the recently promoted M. Night Shyamalan filmography, which I co-nominated. Pinging @BRVAFL as a major contributor. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 00:42, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 18:14, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
*What are "narrative films"?
That's my first pass. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 14:08, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
|
Version reviewed — 1
who began his career in the late 1990s, creating the 1994 [...]— is 1994 considered late in the 90s, especially considering it's part of the first half...? Pamzeis (talk) 12:58, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Promoting. --PresN 18:58, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 24 October 2021 (UTC) [13].[reply]
I am nominating this for featured list because the timeline articles are of the utmost important to WP:SPFLT -- and the universe at large! :) Neopeius (talk) 14:56, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:19, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
;Comments on the lead
|
I haven't reviewed this list fully, but from my review of Spaceflight before 1951 for its FLC, there are several major issues that carry over to this list: namely, the table formatting and the use of Encyclopedia Astronautica. I've put a more thorough explanation there (link). RunningTiger123 (talk) 01:59, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
More comments later, but the list looks in good shape! Balon Greyjoy (talk) 06:19, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Balon Greyjoy: Sorry I missed your comments! --Neopeius (talk) 13:02, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Looks good to me! Support Balon Greyjoy (talk) 15:18, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Pretty impressive and I will be using it as a framework for my revamp of 1968 in spaceflight. Thanks for all the hard work.--Akrasia25 (talk) 20:57, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
adj=on
That takes me to Launches. Plenty of work to do here. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 09:19, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 12:23, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
|caption={{sronly|January launches}}
are retained in future, that achieves what I was asking for here. 𝄠ʀᴀᴘᴘʟᴇ ꭗ 14:52, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]The draft plan for the ambitious 3,000 kilometres (1,900 mi) range R-3—compare this to the lead's
100-kilometre (62 mi) boundary of space, this former usage shouldn't show in plural (ie it should be "3,000 kilometre (1,900 mi) range"). If you add |adj=on to the convert template it should display correctly. Check for consistent use of this throughout; when a distance is being used as an adjective you want to make sure the unit isn't in the plural.
that brief (~15 minutes) exposure—this feels very informal, I would use a tilde for "approximately" in shorthand but I'm not familiar with it being used in formal settings, can we spell this out with a word instead (roughly, approximately, etc)?
free rockets, solid propellants, JATOs, and related itemswith JATO explained only as a pipe link, but also
the United States Naval Research Laboratory (NRL) teamwhere the acronym is spelt out at first use. I believe the latter is preferable but let me know if this is common usage in the field.
versions of which ultimately launched America's first artificial satellite, in 1958, and America's first astronaut, in 1961.This appears to be uncited, but also I don't see the value in egg links for these either; suggest naming Shepard and Explorer-1 in text, and appending a citation to this.
Source review passed; promoting. --PresN 18:58, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:27, 17 October 2021 (UTC) [14].[reply]
The filmography of the well-known Indian director and producer Yash Chopra. I really believe this list meets the FL criteria. --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 12:05, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from ChrisTheDude (talk) 15:50, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
;Comments
|
named Yash Raj FilmsRemove "named".
emerged as a commercial success in both India and overseasUse of "emerge" here seems strange.
family who areReword - family is singular.
it was because action and crime films--> "this was because action and crime films"
one of his career's best films--> "one of his best films"
incest-themedIs incest really a theme?
Overall, pretty good work. I'll be glad to see another featured director's filmography. ~ HAL333 20:03, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Yashthepunisher (talk) 13:14, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 18:10, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
*"he was credited" by whom?
That's all I have for now. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 19:04, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply] |
Please forgive me if I screw anything up...
the drama Waqt about a family who are separated after a natural disaster.— kinda awkward
won him a first Best— a first for him or something else?
popularity had begun to→ popularity began to
feature was named as the— delete "as" as redundant
were popular among the audience— were the films box office successes? Or did audiences give them positive reviews? Clarify
several well-performing films— kinda vague. Can we be more specific (e.g. commercial and critical successes)?
films including Mohabbatein (2000)— should there be a comma after "films"?
for its sensitive portrayal— WP:VOICEy
Ping me once these are resolved! Pamzeis (talk) 07:56, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Source review passed; promoting. --PresN 14:22, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:27, 17 October 2021 (UTC) [15].[reply]
I am nominating this for featured list after working on getting the singer's list of songs, awards, and filmography to FL status. It has gone through a copy-edit to improve the lead. Constructive criticism, in any form and from anyone, will be appreciated.
A pre-emptive comment – The Philippines does not have albums and singles charts that is comparable or equivalent to America's Billboard charts, Australia's ARIA Charts or Japan's Oricon, thus the exclusion of peak chart position columns. The trade organization that awards certifications in the Philippines is PARI, and I’ve included certification sales figure threshold changes over the years. I’ve tried my best to thoroughly search for RS (publications, newspapers, etc.) that are available online, in this case you would find sourcing that only list sales figure or certifications awarded only, where applicable EFNs are included to hopefully help clarify. Happy to address your comments and thanks to all who take the time to review the list. Pseud 14 (talk) 19:27, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from ChrisTheDude (talk) 17:38, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
;Comments on the lead
|
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 18:13, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
*"five extended plays," put (EPs) after as there's no explanation for that abbreviation use in the infobox.
That's all I have on a first quick pass. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 18:26, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
|
Resolved comments from Pamzeis (talk) 14:37, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Please forgive me if I screw something up...
Ping me once these are resolved! Pamzeis (talk) 04:54, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
|
Source review passed; promoting. --PresN 14:39, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:27, 17 October 2021 (UTC) [16].[reply]
I am nominating this for featured list because I have expanded its lead, added over 100 sources (one for each of his films), and followed all of the criteria necessary to make this a FL. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 23:34, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
the character of Grug--> "the character Grug" more concise
his highest-grossing film at the box officeIs "at the box office" needed?
More comments later. Nice work. ~ HAL333 20:26, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
That's all I got, but I'll go ahead and support. ~ HAL333 14:33, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 18:02, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
*"began his career in 1981 with The Best of Times, a television pilot" as an actor or a producer?
That's all I have on a quick pass. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 20:13, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply] |
role in the television pilot The Best of Times— WP:SEAOFBLUE?
The following year, he made his feature film acting debut in Fast Times at Ridgemont High, the second and last time he was credited by his birth name as Nicolas Coppola before changing his name professionally to avoid nepotism allegations due to his connection to the Coppola family.— this sentence seems a tad long
In 1983, Cage was cast in a leading— this sentence seems to be unsourced unless you mean he starred and acted instead of "was cast"
That same year, he— 1986 or 1987?
self-indulgent performance."— per MOS:LQ, move the full stop outside the quotation mark
In 1992, earned his— missing word there
Globe nomination, this time for— I think ", this time" is unnecessary
received a nomination for the BAFTA Award for→ received a BAFTA Award nomination for (nitpick-y but more concise)
Three years later, he starred as a suicidal alcoholic in the critically-acclaimed Leaving Las Vegas and received a nomination for the BAFTA Award for Best Actor in a Leading Role,[8] and earned the Golden Globe for Best Actor – Motion Picture Drama and the Academy Award for Best Actor.— a tad long
"In Cage's hands, cartoonish moments are imbued with real emotion and real emotions become cartoons. Everything – from individual scenes down to single lines of dialogue – feels like they have been embraced as opportunities for creation. Cage is usually interesting even when his films are not. He is erratic and unpredictable; he is captivating and he is capricious. He is a performer. He is a troubadour. He is a jazz musician."— this quote seems quite long and takes up, by my count, over 10% of the article's prose
most notable films— how is it determined which films are the most notable?
Ping me when these are resolved! Pamzeis (talk) 13:20, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Source review passed; promoting. --PresN 14:39, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:26, 17 October 2021 (UTC) [17].[reply]
I am nominating this for featured list because it is a comprehensive look at Bruno Mars' written songs up to today. It contains an introduction and a list of the written songs, their respective writers', albums they were included, and the year of release. I'll try to update it constantly as new songs are released like I have done with all the works for the artist mentioned above. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 07:34, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
and create "a hip-hop, R&B, soul or rock" song, would be it worthwhile to link the genres? This seems to be a standard practice for song and album articles, but II am not entirely sure how this is handled for this type of list.
Mars explained the record was going to be a movie, could use a little more clarification to avoid any confusion that this was literally going to used as the basis for a future movie or it would be a visual album. I think this sentence from the 24K Magic article expresses this a little more clearly: He told that the album was inspired by a non-existent movie that he visualized.
He also co-wrote Cardi B's "Please Me"and
He co-wrote Alicia Keys's "Tears Always Win") in a row that begin the same. I would revise one of these instances to avoid being repetitive.
He co-wrote Alicia Keys's "Tears Always Win", Adele's "All I Ask" for her third studio album, 25 (2015), Jay-Z & Kanye West's "Lift Off", and "Welcome Back" for the soundtrack of Rio 2.Why are two albums named (i.e. 25 and Rio 2). but not (Girl on Fire or Watch the Throne)? It just seems a little random to only mention two albums here.
Great work with the list. I am glad to see a FLC about songwriting. My comments are relatively minor and once everything is addressed, I will be more than happy to support this nomination for promotion. I hope you are having a great week so far! Aoba47 (talk) 18:50, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
%20
where the space should be, as Help:Footnotes calls for that; my hunch is that will resolve the issue. Also, the link-checker tool doesn't seem to like the Global Music Rights site, so I suggest double-checking a couple of them to make sure the links are still in working order.Giants2008 First of all, thank you for taking your time to comment on the article and making the source review. I checked all the Global Music Rights and they all work, I also fixed the issue on reference 126. If anything else rises an eyebrow just let me know. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 09:22, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 21:58, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
*Where is note 1 referenced?
That's all I have for a quick pass. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 20:06, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
|
That's all from me. -- Carlobunnie (talk) 15:36, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Not gonna screw anything up... (hopefully)
various artists, notably on— MOS:EDITORIALISING
by a non-existent movie→ by a non-existent film
The singer has many— Keys or Mars?
Close enough to support. On an unrelated note, I'd appreciate any comments here. Pamzeis (talk) 02:46, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Promoting. --PresN 14:22, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 17 October 2021 (UTC) [18].[reply]
Having checked the nominated list against the six FL criteria, I believe it's ready for FLC. As the main editor, I have sought to be neutral and comprehensive in my writing, and the list includes extensive citations. All recording dates, venues, and runtimes are sourced directly to the CD (or in the case of one or two entries, LP) liner notes, rather than third party websites such as musicbrainz.org, discogs.com, or musicweb-international.com. (I'd like to here acknowledge, and thank, a handful of users over at talkclassical.com, who generously provided me scans of liner notes in their personal collections... in particular, Kiki was extremely helpful.) Moreover, citation templates have been used. I have also made use of the work of Sibelius biographers and musicologists, especially in relating the importance of the Sibelius cycle and the historical play-by-play. Thank you, in advance, for your comments and for having taken the time to give the list a read through. Silence of Järvenpää (talk) 18:21, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from Tim riley talk 13:34, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
;Comments
Booking my place. Looks top class after first quick read-through. Comments after closer second perusal. Tim riley talk 22:50, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
That seems like a longish list of quibbles, and so let me conclude by saying that this seems to me an impressive article, thoroughly researched and scrupulously cited. I look forward to supporting its elevation to FL. – Tim riley talk 09:46, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply] |
It seems to me that the only quibble left undealt with is the one about the LSO recording dates in 1932, a matter so minor as to be barely discernible with the naked eye. Do sort it out if you can, but I'm not delaying my support on that account. So, I'm adding my support for the elevation of this article to FL. It seems to me to meet all the criteria, and I found it a pleasure to read and to review. A first rate piece of work, in my view. Tim riley talk 13:34, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from ChrisTheDude (talk) 16:52, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
;Comments
|
Well I already looked at the sources when we were discussing at my talk page, but let's see what I find now...! Aza24 (talk) 21:06, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Aza24 – Thanks for the source review. I have fixed almost everything, and added missing sources for the Sfns with harv error (which were difficult to find, give that I know very less about this list). 3 of the 4 errors are now resolved, but I'm not able to find the source for the remaining one (Ref#117). Should I just remove it as the same info could be verified by other given sources too. Please suggest. – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 18:43, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
A prodigious piece of work. Just a few points above. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 09:44, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed some minor table formatting issues, and addressed the "incomplete list" comment- the section has a form inclusion criteria (a conductor who recorded 3+ parts with the same orchestra (but not all 7)), but it was buried in a note instead of in the text. I've made it more prominent. With that, I think we're good to promote. --PresN 14:21, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The list was promoted by Giants2008 via FACBot (talk) 00:28, 11 October 2021 (UTC) [21].[reply]
I'm back at it with another filmography. This time it's Samuel L. Jackson, one of my favorite actors and the highest grossing live-action actor of all time. ~ HAL333 15:46, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comments from Dank
That'll do for a first pass. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 19:41, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
– Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 15:06, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The list was promoted by Giants2008 via FACBot (talk) 00:27, 11 October 2021 (UTC) [22].[reply]
After making the list up to date and fixing some of the suggestions made on the previous FLC, I am nominating this for featured list status. It is very similar to the other Gillingham player lists and fits all of the FLC criteria. KingSkyLord (talk | contribs) 21:55, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:38, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
;Comment
|
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 18:05, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
*"Luke Freeman" image, could you crop it so we don't have so much "green" space?
That's all I have. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 09:19, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply] |
{{sfn|Mitchell|Reeves|Tyler|2013|p/pp=??}}
The list was promoted by Giants2008 via FACBot (talk) 00:26, 11 October 2021 (UTC) [23].[reply]
This is the final list to supplement the 2nd Infantry Division (United Kingdom) article. This list contains all 60+ officers who commanded the 2nd Division over its 200-year history. It has previously been assessed and passed as an A-Class list.EnigmaMcmxc (talk) 15:39, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comments from Dank
Resolved comments from RunningTiger123 (talk) 01:27, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
* Sorting was the main issue I noticed earlier, but those issues seem to have been resolved – nice job there!
— RunningTiger123 (talk) 01:43, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
|
Support – RunningTiger123 (talk) 01:27, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
That's enough for a quick run-through. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 20:09, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The list was promoted by Giants2008 via FACBot (talk) 00:26, 11 October 2021 (UTC) [24].[reply]
Hi everyone, here's the latest of my number-one country song lists. If 2015 (currently nominated with multiple supports) and this one are both promoted, that will create an unbroken run from 1959 to 2020. This year, it was mostly about bro-country, so if you liked songs about trucks and pretty girls, this was a good year for you to listen to country music radio :-) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 13:50, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 18:14, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
*Link chart.
That's all I have, a typically good piece of work. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 16:16, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
|
Comments from Dank
Support from Ojorojo – Another well-done list; I don't see any issues here. —Ojorojo (talk) 14:06, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The list was promoted by Giants2008 via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 11 October 2021 (UTC) [25].[reply]
Hi everyone, we're nearly there now you will be pleased to hear - with 74 of these number-one country songs lists promoted to FL and one nearly there, here's the penultimate one to be nominated (until this year ends and I need to work on the one for 2021.....). In this year, acts reaching number one included such legends as the Everly Brothers and Elvis - back in 1957, Billboard considered the early rock and roll/rockabilly sound to be a hybrid of country music and rhythm and blues, and so classics like "Jailhouse Rock" were big hits on both the country and R&B charts. Anyway, as ever I look forward to your feedback, which will be acted on as quickly as humanly possible..... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 21:17, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
– Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 08:43, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
As always, nice work. You should be able to get one of these past me with zero comments by now but .......
That's it. Please make sure to ping me when you get round to the topic nomination! Cheers. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 20:21, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comments from Dank
Comments from Ojorojo
Another well-done list, but I have a couple of questions:
—Ojorojo (talk) 14:01, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The list was promoted by Giants2008 via FACBot (talk) 00:27, 4 October 2021 (UTC) [26].[reply]
I am nominating this for featured list because I feel that these types of lists on United States presidential elections have a great potential to be FL. I almost completely re-formatted the list, added a lead, and key for political parties. It lists all the elections in which Hawaii participated, with votes and percentage. I intend to make similar changes to all the lists within this series. I would respond to every comment, and try to bring this nomination to FL standards whenever needed. With one of the list (United States presidential elections in Washington, D.C.) currently a FLC, with multiple comprehensive reviews, all resolved, I nominate this too. Check this page for progress. Thanks! (47 states more to go) – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 03:32, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 09:23, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
*"every presidential elections, except for 1972 and 1984 presidential elections" presidential elections/presidential elections repetitive.
That's all I have. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 07:28, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
|
— RunningTiger123 (talk) 04:05, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support – good to see more progress on these lists! RunningTiger123 (talk) 19:58, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The list was promoted by Giants2008 via FACBot (talk) 00:26, 4 October 2021 (UTC) [27].[reply]
Just to preface this, this is my first featured list nomination, so I apologize ahead of time for any issues. Anyway, I've been working on this article for the past few days, and I believe it meets the featured list criteria. It covers relevant information on the office of the president for Princeton University as well as lists all presidents and acting presidents that have served the office. I'll be pleased to address any and all feedback. PoliticsIsExciting (talk) 20:06, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from RunningTiger123 (talk) 17:11, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
;Comments
— RunningTiger123 (talk) 18:52, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
|
Support – nice work! RunningTiger123 (talk) 17:11, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
three presidents who have resignedDon't most presidents resign at the end of their tenure (the only alternatives being dying or being impeached)? I'm guessing that this is saying something more specific, perhaps resigned in the middle of their term, but if so it's ill-defined. {{u|Sdkb}} talk 21:21, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Many of Princeton's deceased presidents are buriedDo we have a specific number? {{u|Sdkb}} talk 21:21, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Father of Ashbel Green, 8th president of the universityAshbel Green shouldn't be listed right next to a big ten, then. Whatever numbering system we decide on, it needs to be self-consistent. {{u|Sdkb}} talk 21:21, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The longest serving president was James Carnahan at 31 years, and the shortest was Jonathan Edwards at five weeksThere's a grammar issue here, as "at 31 years" refers to Carnahan's tenure, not Carnahan himself. {{u|Sdkb}} talk 21:21, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
All of Princeton's presidents have been white and all besides Shirley Tilghman have been male.? Race and gender are frequently brought up together, and it'd introduce neutrality concerns to highlight only the one where the university has started to diversify. {{u|Sdkb}} talk 18:20, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Died while in office in Philadelphia seeking medical treatmentDo we know anything more specific about what disease he had? {{u|Sdkb}} talk 21:21, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Founding Father of the United States of America; Signer of the Declaration of IndependenceIn the sense you're using Founding Father here, it's synonymous with signer of Declaration of Independence; to avoid redundancy, we should choose only one. {{u|Sdkb}} talk 21:21, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
ongoing issues with the institutionThis is rather vague; would there be any way to concisely say what the issues were, or would that require going into undue detail? {{u|Sdkb}} talk 21:21, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Resigned after pressure from university trusteesAgain, it'd be helpful to have a little bit of specificity if it's possible to provide it concisely. Especially given that we're citing a history from Princeton, we should be wary of any attempts to sugarcoat some of the nastier battles in history by papering them over with generalities. I'm not sure if that's something happening here, but something to be on the lookout for. {{u|Sdkb}} talk 21:21, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
28th President of the United Statesto
28th President of the United States(including the "28th" in the link to avoid any eggs). {{u|Sdkb}} talk 21:21, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
10th President of the University of Michigan, which would work equally well as
10th president of the University of Michigan, since "president of the University of Michigan" is both a description and a title. I don't have any issue if you want to leave it this way, as the way you've done it is both valid and consistent, but just wanted to note it. Institutions almost always prefer to capitalize, as it makes them seem more important, so it's sometimes something to watch for neutrality. {{u|Sdkb}} talk 21:21, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
|website=
and |publisher=
, as I'm not sure of the exact relationship between NJ.com and The Times, but however we resolve it, The Times needs to be italicized as it's a newspaper. {{u|Sdkb}} talk 21:21, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Overall, this list looks in quite good shape (especially considering it's your first FL nom). The lack of information about academic specialties is probably the biggest issue. I haven't done a full source review, but if my concerns above are adequately addressed, I will be happy to support. Cheers, {{u|Sdkb}} talk 21:21, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Looking now. Aza24 (talk) 20:46, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
when possible, so it's not a hard rule. {{u|Sdkb}} talk 03:04, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
You must also include a United States public domain tag to indicate why this work is in the public domain in the United States, and it's missing any such tag. It also doesn't say who the author is (other than "Herald"), so there's no way to know if they died 70 years ago. Given this, if someone wanted to really get rid of it, they'd be justified in nominating it for deletion on Commons.
That's all I have. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 08:06, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The list was promoted by Giants2008 via FACBot (talk) 00:26, 4 October 2021 (UTC) [29].[reply]
This list is about the various points systems used by the FIA Formula One World Championship over the course of the history of the series to determine who wins the World Drivers' Championship and the World Constructors' Championship each season. I expanded this list two months ago and believe it meets the FL criteria. All comments are welcome MWright96 (talk) 13:42, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:30, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
;Comments
|
Comments
Other than these points, it looks good. NapHit (talk) 14:24, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 18:09, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
*"with the highest number of points attained" with the most points.
That's all I have. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 18:15, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
|
– Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 15:26, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The list was promoted by Giants2008 via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 4 October 2021 (UTC) [30].[reply]
I am nominating this for featured list because I made sure it meets all of the FL criteria. Leo Mercury (talk) 14:34, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The only image File:JamesCameronStarDec09.jpg is appropriated licenced. Pass for Image review. – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 15:59, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from RunningTiger123 (talk) 19:25, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
* "breaking the record for being the most awarded individual in this category" – citation needed
— RunningTiger123 (talk) 16:43, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply] |
All changes look good, and I'm happy to support now. RunningTiger123 (talk) 19:25, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
In addition to the good comments above, here are some of my thoughts:
That's all I have for now. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 18:07, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
– Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 10:21, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
epic romance— possibly link this to romantic epic?
one of the most expensive films ever made— suggest linking this to list of most expensive films
It was released to critical acclaim and commercial success and holds the title for being the first picture to cross $1 billion at the box office.→ Released to critical acclaim and commercial success, it became the first picture to gross $1 billion at the box office.
the 1998 Academy Awards/
the 1998 British Academy Film Awards— WP:SEAOFBLUE?
In 2009, Cameron released his first feature film in twelve years, Avatar.→ In 2009, Avatar, Cameron's first feature film in twelve years, was released. (Technically, Cameron didn't release it.)
The film broke several box office records and on January 25, 2010, became the highest-grossing movie in history.→ It broke several box office records and on January 25, 2010, became the highest-grossing film in history. (To reduce repetition of "film", potential WP:EGG and mention of "movie" (which I believe is discouraged).)
nominations, with Cameron being the recipient of three of them→ nominations, Cameron the recipient of three of them (more concise)
Ping me when these have been resolved and I'll (probably) be happy to support! Pamzeis (talk) 07:31, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]