Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/November-2024

Featured picture tools
Featured pictures (on Wikimedia Commons) Featured picture criteria Featured picture candidates (on Wikimedia Commons) Featured picture thumbs Featured picture archive Picture of the day (Guidelines) Picture of the day archive (and schedule)
v t e

Please cut and paste new entries to the bottom of this page, creating a new monthly archive (by closing date) when necessary.

	Older Archive
	Miscellaneous Archive
2004:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2005:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2006:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2007:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2008:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2009:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2010:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2011:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2012:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2013:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2014:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2015:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2016:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2017:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2018:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2019:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2020:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2021:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2022:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2023:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2024:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
Purge page cache if nominations haven't updated.

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 1 Nov 2024 at 13:48:19 (UTC)

Reason

Striking, extremely high resolution image of Josephine Baker in a style contemporary to her heyday. Featured picture on Commons.

Articles in which this image appears

Josephine Baker, kiss curl, laid edges, Donyale Luna

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Artwork/Others or
Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Culture, entertainment, and lifestyle/Entertainment

Creator

Jean Chassaing

• Support as nominator – Moonreach (talk) 13:48, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Yann (talk) 11:28, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Cool graphics. – Sca (talk) 12:55, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - Nice! — Chris Woodrich (talk) 22:13, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support --Janke | Talk 07:28, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Could use restoration, but that could just be a D&R later. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.9% of all FPs.} 21:01, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. MER-C 10:20, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:22, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 09:16, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Joséphine Baker par Jean Chassaing.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 14:08, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 3 Nov 2024 at 19:48:50 (UTC)

Reason

Has anyone ever tried a 3D model nomination here? I haven't seen one, and I figured 3DBenchy would be a worthy attempt. 3DBenchy is a calibration object designed to stress test 3D printers. It is open-source and (in certain circles) quite famous. If you prefer to grade it purely as an image, the largest 2D preview is well over the minimum pixel count and the underlying file is almost 11 MB.

Articles in which this image appears

3DBenchy

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Other or
Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Engineering and technology/Others

Creator

Daniel Norée & Paulo Kiefe (by Creative Tools Sweden AB)

• Support as nominator – Moonreach (talk) 19:48, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment – I think this is going to be a tough sell based on how poorly mediawiki renders previews of STL files, but if we were going to feature an STL file either this or File:Utah teapot (solid).stl would be good candidates. --Ahecht (TALK
  PAGE) 20:03, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  A thought crossed my mind that what we really need is a wiki project called Featured Multimedia, which could handle all the file types that aren't images (and perhaps videos, since Featured Pictures has a prior claim on those). I discovered there was Wikipedia:Featured sounds, but it's been dormant since 2011. That catalog would make a good starting point for Featured Multimedia. Moonreach (talk) 20:42, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Oppose - edges are a pixel mess! The teapot is clean, would support that. --Janke | Talk 07:29, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  I worry about the licensing situation with the teapot. Our copy is tagged CC, but it's a recreation of someone else's 3D model, which is in turn a recreation of a commercial article. It's possible the pathway is still clear - I don't know what the college's license is, and I believe in the US functional items can't have their designs copyrighted, but that's still more hoops than I want to jump through. Moonreach (talk) 15:36, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment – If we're going to start allowing 3D models into FP, then we may aswell rename it from Featured Pictures to Featured Media ―Howard • 🌽³³ 08:46, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  See my comment above - I wonder if there is enough interest (and enough such material) that a separate project might be worthwhile. I would estimate that all sounds, videos and 3D objects in Commons are still lesser in number than all the pictures, but they still represent a substantial amount of the media Wikimedia has to offer. Moonreach (talk) 15:59, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Oppose - As stated, I can count the pixels, especially at the edges of the shadows. SirMemeGod  12:32, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  You mean the polygons? ―Howard • 🌽³³ 08:27, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Support. This is a nice 3D model. As far as I can tell, the pixellation is entirely the fault of the Mediawiki viewer and not the file itself. Toadspike [Talk] 22:52, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 19:49, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 3 Nov 2024 at 20:57:30 (UTC)

Reason

No single cover can fully encapsulate pulp magazines, but this one has a lot of good stuff: A spaceman with a jetpack and a raygun carrying an improbably dressed woman, while in the background some kind of futuristic machine explodes. The scan quality is good, and captures the halftone printing dots, which are functionally the resolution limit of the source image. I did a light crop to remove a white line on the right side, but I don't want to get too crop-happy, since this is a time-worn physical object and has somewhat uneven edges because of it.

Articles in which this image appears

Pulp magazine, Ray Cummings, later added: Planet Stories

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Artwork/Literary illustrations

Creator

Albert Drake, whose signature in the lower left corner unfortunately has the Fiction House roundel printed squarely over the top of it

• Support as nominator – Moonreach (talk) 20:57, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment – EV? – Sca (talk) 12:55, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Definitely agree that EV could be an issue. We have numerous FAs on pulp magazines, to use one that doesn't have an article to represent the genre would be problematic. Having an article on Planet Stories would ameliorate that concern.  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 15:15, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oops, we have an FA on Planet Stories. It would definitely do better here if were in that article.  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 17:51, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Will support if it's in the Planet Stories article. Has higher resolution than other images in that article. Bammesk (talk) 20:09, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Chris Woodrich, Bammesk - I've added it to Planet Stories. Moonreach (talk) 16:41, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Unfortunately not stable.  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 17:38, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

      I saw. I'll leave a message with that editor and see if there's another place in the article it can go. Moonreach (talk) 18:57, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

      I talked it over with them and put it in a different spot on the page that they suggested. I don't know if the article will prove stable or not, but it's back in for now, and it is stable on the other pages. Moonreach (talk) 19:37, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

      Alright, I see that Mike Christie and yourself discussed it at his talk page. Always happy to see consensus building.  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 21:29, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Support - I think that, with a consensus to keep the image in the article, the stability criterion should be fulfilled. Just as a note, my concern was not that an item should not represent its class; rather, I think that class representation would best be done by a work that is discussed in detail by an article on the class. In this case, Planet Stories was one of a list of publications from the peak of the genre's popularity, as opposed to (say) The Popular Magazine, which is discussed in detail. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 21:29, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Bammesk (talk) 00:32, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment Quite OK, but the resolution is just good enough. I also see one scratch which should be corrected (see the note on Commons). Surprisingly, this version seems not to be indexed on Tineye. Yann (talk) 17:05, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Carlosmarkos2345 (talk) 16:52, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:01, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 04:34, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Planet stories 1940fal.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 20:59, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Added image to Culture, entertainment, and lifestyle/Entertainment instead. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 20:59, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 4 Nov 2024 at 08:59:34 (UTC)

Reason

Infobox image of Blue-throated barbet. Recent FP on Commons, unanimously promoted in 5 days.

Articles in which this image appears

Blue-throated barbet; Megalaimidae

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds

Creator

Tagooty

• Support as nominator – Tagooty (talk) 08:59, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: @Tagooty: too much sky at the top perhaps? Nythar (💬-🍀) 19:29, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  The headroom is aesthically pleasing to me. This FPC which is likely to get promoted has much more empty space. Tagooty (talk) 03:02, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  True, but the Eurasian chaffinch photo is almost square shaped, so the empty space at the top is less noticeable. That bird's tail is also higher up compared with the Blue-throated barbet. This bird on the other hand and the branch it's on appear oddly low in the image, an issue that becomes evident if you view the image on fullscreen (compounded by the fact that the image is vertical). The tail to head distance and the position of the bird just seem a bit off. Reducing the top by about 1/4 or 1/3 could solve this issue in my opinion. Regards, Nythar (💬-🍀) 04:16, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

   Done Fair enough. I've cropped it for more uniform space on all sides. Uploaded with a "crop" filename as the original is QI and FP on Commons. --Tagooty (talk) 09:14, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  I think it could go slightly further. Using Photoshop's rulers, I'm seeing that the head has 175px more space than the tail. The left-right margins are also unabalanced, but in that case there are branches and whatnot that allow the eye to follow.  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 15:13, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Having the head a little closer to the middle of the image than the tail is justified for 2 reasons: From the aesthetic PoV, an unbalanced layout is more appealing than geometric balance. From the EV PoV, the most interesting part of the bird is the multi-coloured head, neck and bill (see Description). Tagooty (talk) 03:32, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Thanks Tagooty. There don't seem to be any other issues to me, so I'll Support. Nythar (💬-🍀) 15:44, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:22, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 09:14, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support --Navneetsharmaiit (talk) 10:19, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  I struck this vote. Editor has less than 100 edits. See instructions on top of the WP:FPC page. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 21:28, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Support - Dg432 (talk) 05:23, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Blue-throated Barbet Sasatgre West Garo crop Oct24 A7CR 03684.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 09:00, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 4 Nov 2024 at 13:36:20 (UTC)

Reason

High EV, a very rare image of an extremely violent weather event, one of the higest-quality images I've ever seen of a tornado overall. FP on Commons, Indonesian Wiki and Turkish Wiki. Used in 70 pages just on the English Wikipedia.

Articles in which this image appears

2007 Elie tornado, Tornado, Atmospheric convection, Climate of Manitoba, Elie, Manitoba, From This Place, List of Canadian tornadoes and tornado outbreaks (since 2001), List of tornadoes by province (Canada), Outline of Manitoba, Severe weather, Thunderstorm +60 more

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena/Weather

Creator

Justin1569

• Support as nominator – SirMemeGod  13:36, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Moonreach (talk) 15:32, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – _ZZ^Z'S 23:46, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Very high EV. --Tagooty (talk) 03:04, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Yann (talk) 09:45, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:21, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 09:13, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. MER-C 11:01, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:F5 tornado Elie Manitoba 2007.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 13:37, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 4 Nov 2024 at 16:51:54 (UTC)

Reason

A fine image of the founder of the British Labour Party

Articles in which this image appears

Keir Hardie, et al.

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured_pictures/People/Political

Creator

George Grantham Bain, restored by Adam Cuerden

• Support as nominator – Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.9% of all FPs.} 16:51, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support — Moonreach (talk) 16:59, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Nythar (💬-🍀) 19:36, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – ―Howard • 🌽³³ 23:44, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Yann (talk) 09:44, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:21, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 09:12, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. MER-C 10:59, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Excellent quality and good EV. --Tagooty (talk) 03:12, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Keir Hardie by George Grantham Bain.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 19:23, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 4 Nov 2024 at 23:41:57 (UTC)

Reason

A freely licensed high quality image of the official cover art of a famous video game.

Articles in which this image appears

Celeste (video game)

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Culture, entertainment, and lifestyle/Entertainment

Creator

Maddy Makes Games

• Support as nominator – ―Howard • 🌽³³ 23:41, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:26, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Those damned strawberries...  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 14:59, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Such releases are to be encouraged. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.9% of all FPs.} 00:31, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 09:11, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Moonreach (talk) 16:35, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• I wasn't notified but support as uploader czar 16:33, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support (Guyinblack25 ^talk 21:37, 4 November 2024 (UTC))[reply]

Promoted File:Celeste box art full.png --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 23:42, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 5 Nov 2024 at 15:22:17 (UTC)

Reason

High quality scan of a piece of newspaper art. The murder of Wang Lianying, a famed courtesan, captured imaginations in Shanghai, and the case was even reported in the international press. This image, which accompanied coverage of the trial in the New York Tribune, illustrates that international coverage; it also provides an early example of artwork by Jefferson Machamer, who developed a reputation for depicting glamourous women.

Articles in which this image appears

Murder of Wang Lianying, Jefferson Machamer

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Artwork/Others, perhaps?

Creator

Jefferson Machamer, restored (cleaned, text removed) by  — Chris Woodrich (talk)

• Support as nominator –  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 15:22, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment – Too soon? The image was put in the article yesterday. I think it will be stable so, conditional Support, assuming it's stable at the end of this nomination. Bammesk (talk) 20:02, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Considering the murder article didn't exist until yesterday (was moved to main space, drafted starting two days ago), I don't think it violates the spirit of the stability criterion.  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 20:04, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Agree. I don't see the image being removed. I struck the "conditional" part of my vote. Bammesk (talk) 20:28, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Support – Moonreach (talk) 16:35, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:01, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 04:52, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Caricature of Wang Lianying by Thomas Machamer, New York Tribune, 1920-10-03, p5.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 15:41, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 6 Nov 2024 at 10:52:56 (UTC)

Reason

Unanimously featured on Commons. Headline image.

Articles in which this image appears

Junonia coenia

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Insects

Creator

Rhododendrites

• Support as nominator – MER-C 10:52, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support SirMemeGod  16:21, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Excellent detail, high EV. --Tagooty (talk) 00:54, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 19:31, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Carlosmarkos2345 (talk) 16:41, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:01, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 04:51, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Common buckeye (35663).jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 10:54, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 6 Nov 2024 at 11:07:37 (UTC)

Reason

Unanimously featured on Commons. Illustrates article well.

Articles in which this image appears

Grey plover, Scarborough Marsh

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds

Creator

Chuck Homler

• Support as nominator – MER-C 11:07, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support This image should be in the infobox in the article, IMO. --Tagooty (talk) 03:11, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 19:32, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support -- thank you -Needsmoreritalin (talk) 02:54, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:01, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 04:50, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:BBPlover Scarborough Marsh.png --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 11:19, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 6 Nov 2024 at 16:29:51 (UTC)

Reason

Quality lead image in Cerro Tololo observatory article, with the open dome Blanco Telescope in center-right.

Articles in which this image appears

Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Space/Understanding

Creator

CTIO/NOIRLab/NSF/AURA/T. Matsopoulos

• Support as nominator – Bammesk (talk) 16:29, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Tilted? Yann (talk) 14:05, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Yann, no I don't think so. The beams on the telescope's housing are vertical. Bammesk (talk) 01:08, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Hmm, weird that the horizon is so sloping... Yann (talk) 11:15, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• That's not really horizon. Just layers of mountains (horizon would be past the mountains). I understand if you don't like it. Bammesk (talk) 03:10, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Definitely titled. If the camera is pointing down the lines on a building will not be vertical ro|3ek (talk) 17:24, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Photographers often correct that type of perspective tilt, so the lines come out vertical. See this recent nomination for example where we fixed the tilt ourselves. Bammesk (talk) 03:10, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Support – All the lines that should be vertical (the dome aperture, the silo-type things) are. I think the mountains really do just slope downward like that. Moonreach (talk) 16:33, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  I double-checked, and the silos aren't truly vertical, although they're close. The exterior vertical elements on the observatory base are, though. It's possible that there really is a tilt here, but if there is, it's much more subtle that then horizon line suggests. Moonreach (talk) 19:41, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Fixed. That was wide-angle lens distortion. I thought it wasn't significant, but since you noticed it . . . now fixed. BTW the silos are water tanks. Bammesk (talk) 00:15, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• To illustrate the camera rotation in this photo as per discussion above, I don't have a lens correction profile for the drone used here, so the perspective lines won't quite match. ro|3ek (talk) 13:23, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Sorry, I disagree. The camera is pointing northeast. Google Earth here and here and the elevation map here confirm that's the natural slope of the mountains. In the screenshots, the observatory is at the center of the red circles. Some mountainous skylines just aren't horizontal. Bammesk (talk) 01:14, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• OK, convincing, so Support – Yann (talk) 14:32, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Support ro|3ek (talk) 16:20, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 11:59, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Blanco's Open Dome (Cerro-Tololo-Drone-Pic 15-CC) - edit1.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 16:54, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 7 Nov 2024 at 16:18:39 (UTC)

Reason

High EV, probably the best image that sums up the entire event. Lede image for the article itself.

Articles in which this image appears

January 6 United States Capitol attack, Donald Trump and fascism, History of the Republican Party (United States), History of the United States, List of controversial elections, List of protests in the 21st century, Political demonstration, Political ideologies in the United States, Right-wing terrorism, United States, 2020s, 2021

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/History/American

Creator

Tyler Merbler

• Support as nominator – SirMemeGod  16:18, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose – Old news, reproduced countless times; political. – Sca (talk) 12:23, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Moonreach (talk) 16:31, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 19:31, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – stable lead image in its primary article for 3 years. Sir MemeGod|, the list of articles above should be "in order of where the image has highest encyclopedic value". I reordered the list slightly. Bammesk (talk) 00:29, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Yann (talk) 13:00, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 11:59, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 04:48, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:2021 storming of the United States Capitol DSC09254-2 (50820534063) (retouched).jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 16:49, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 8 Nov 2024 at 12:48:47 (UTC)

Reason

my first Featured picture nomination since, you know, that thing, however the reason I'm nominate this movie, it's becaused it is one of the most well know Charlie Chaplin movies and also, is the one of two chaplin movies to win an oscar

Articles in which this image appears

The Circus (1928 film)

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Culture, entertainment, and lifestyle/Film

Creator

Charlie Chaplin

• Support as nominator – Carlosmarkos2345 (talk) 12:48, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Yann (talk) 13:57, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 16:34, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Absolute classic! --Janke | Talk 20:27, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Moonreach (talk) 16:31, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 11:59, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 04:45, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:The Circus (1928) by Charlie Chaplin (restored version).webm --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 12:50, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 8 Nov 2024 at 13:17:30 (UTC)

Reason

A really good image of the events, it shows the chaos and has relatively high EV. Framing is also good. It definitely catches my eye whenever I read the article. May need slight perspective correction, but I believe the image is supposed to line up with the man, and not the other objects, which makes sense.

Articles in which this image appears

2020 in Japan, George Floyd protests, George Floyd protests in Minneapolis–Saint Paul, United States racial unrest (2020–2023)

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/History/American

Creator

Lorie Shaull

• Support as nominator – SirMemeGod  13:17, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – ro|3ek (talk) 17:25, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Yann (talk) 20:33, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Moonreach (talk) 16:30, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - The Dutch angle helps create a sense of unease, so I'd definitely keep it. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 19:30, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - Interesting scene. Looks a bit lazy at 5 a.m. in the morning and seemingly sort of staged because of that. The person’s gaze is definitely uneasy. All in all, good composition and a nice piece of photojournalism. --Argenberg (talk) 10:51, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 11:59, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 04:44, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:A man stands on a burned out car on Thursday morning as fires burn behind him in the Lake St area of Minneapolis, Minnesota (49945886467).jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 13:18, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 8 Nov 2024 at 18:16:15 (UTC)

Reason

Shooting the brightest light source is a challenge. Capturing a solar diffraction spike in the context of an urban canyon at the golden hour was a particular challenge for me. In order to execute this image, I undertook my first attempt at bracketing and compositing. On the day I shot, I executed about a half dozen different 7-picture autobracketing sequences with full-stop increments from -3 to +3 in under 10 minutes on this camera while the sun was visible in this urban canyon. I prefer this one because the sunburst/diffraction spike has an appealling shape (especially in article space thumbs). Furthermore, in this sequence the rare double-bladed spikes are uniform throughout the scene. I composited it using free Canon software that is limited to 3 source files. Since I metered to the main subject, I ended up relying on the overexposed sequence elements to composite. The best result here uses the +1- and +3-stop sequence elements. It is slightly better than +1/+2/+3 and +2/+3 versions that are also on commons. I apologize that I cropped out so many pixels, but at the time I only had one good tripod for a three camera setup and this camera was hanging off of another camera at a 15+ degree tilt. For a first attempt at bracketing/compositing with free software, this is a pretty solid result. I think this diffraction spike really pops in thumbnail size that you see in article space.

Articles in which this image appears

Diffraction spike, Urban canyon, Golden hour (photography), Hyde Park, Chicago

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured_pictures#Sciences

Creator

TonyTheTiger

• Support as nominator – TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 18:16, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Looks like you've put a lot of effort into planning of the shoot. It can get stressful when you're time constrained like in this case. The problem is that the photo is not a great illustration of an urban canyon. The buildings on the left are only 3 storey high. See Manhattanhenge for comparison. It also doesn't quite work as an illustration of the golden hour. All the buildings are backlit and therefore in the shadow so you're not showing what the red light does to the landscape.ro|3ek (talk) 22:55, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • User:Robek, this was actually a practice session two days before Chicagohenge, which turned out to have bad weather this year. You have educated me on the golden hour. Your point about the buildings being backlit is certainly true, but the red light is quite visible on the street surface. On the left between the Hotel Del Prado in the foreground and the Hyde Park–Kenwood National Bank Building off in the distance are 3 story buildings. However, if you read the urban canyon article this is defined as an Avenue canyon in the 3 story stretches and a regular or deep canyon in other stretches. On the 2nd of the two actual days of Chicagohenge 3 days later, I went downtown to photograph deep canyons. I was amid deeper canyons, but the diffraction spikes were less presentable. The diffraction spike is actually the focus of the image. I have reordered the article usage in this regard moving diff spike to first.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 03:56, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • P.S. the point of Xhenge photography is to show the beauty of the sunset or sunrise in the context of architecture. None of the sun photos in Manhattanhenge article show a particularly artistic sun. Most of them are just glowing masses. This nomination presents a splendid diffraction spike. Except for maybe one red presentation, I don't think Manhattanhenge has good sun presentations. The article does present the crowd gatherings in all their glory. However, I had better red rings with my longest lens on another camera, because I had concentric red rings around the sun rather than that. I do aspire to get more picturesque results in deeper canyons in future years.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 04:21, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 11:56, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 18:23, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Nomination didn’t reach the necessary quorum for promotion. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 18:23, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 10 Nov 2024 at 13:06:46 (UTC)

Reason

notable photograph, high quality and resolution

Articles in which this image appears

Monolith, the Face of Half Dome, Ansel Adams, Half Dome

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Artwork/Others

Creator

Ansel Adams

• Finding the right version took a lot of time, that's why this second nomination. Thanks to Adam Cuerden.
• Support as nominator – Yann (talk) 13:06, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment - Lots'a'spots, white and black... --Janke | Talk 13:51, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment — I know you're trying really hard to make this image work, but this copy has washed-out blacks at the bottom, which the others didn't. Moonreach (talk) 16:28, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• I don't agree with calling it "washed-out blacks". Because this copy has more detail in the darker areas than the other versions (compare at same magnification). Ansel Adams had his own unconventional developing and printing techniques. So his highlights and blacks aren't always conventional. I am not an expert but that's what I've read about him. Bammesk (talk) 01:40, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 11:56, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@VulcanSphere: in case you don't monitor FP noms, this nom now has an Alt image. Bammesk (talk) 02:22, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Bammesk: Vulcan already added a vote, thanks for your reminder.–Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 03:39, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• I edited the image and uploaded Alt 1, per Janke (restored spots) and per Moonreach (adjusted darker levels at the bottom). In the nom version (Original), the darker levels are noticeably brighter at the bottom. That's not the case in these versions: [1][2][3]. Looking at other images at the source link [4], these are prints, and in some scans light leaks around the edges throwing off the darker levels, examples [5][6]. I think that explains it and justifies adjusting the levels at the bottom of the nom image. On a different note: I think Library of Congress has a higher resolution scan, but does not allow downloads because of copyright, even though publication was 1927 and copyright has expired. We can do a "delist and replace" nom when the LOC copy becomes available. Support Alt 1. Bammesk (talk) 19:14, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Thanks. Support Alt 1 – Yann (talk) 19:50, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Support alt 1. MER-C 11:08, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Alt 1 — Moonreach (talk) 16:44, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Alt 1 –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 03:39, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Alt 1 – Hamid Hassani (talk) 06:00, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Ansel-adams-monolith-the-face-of-half-dome - edit1.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 13:07, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 10 Nov 2024 at 13:36:47 (UTC)

Reason

a very impressive early animated film by Winsor McCay, and also, a featured article on English Wikipedia

Articles in which this image appears

The Sinking of the Lusitania, Sinking of the RMS Lusitania, Winsor McCay, Animated documentary

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Culture, entertainment, and lifestyle/Film

Creator

Winsor McCay

• Support as nominator – Carlosmarkos2345 (talk) 13:36, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose - This is scanned from a very bad and damaged print. There must be better copies available. --Janke | Talk 13:49, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose – Low-rez print of an old propaganda flick. – Sca (talk) 14:45, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose; per Janke. – Hamid Hassani (talk) 04:41, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 14:11, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 10 Nov 2024 at 18:03:57 (UTC)

Reason

High EV, while it may be a little hard to understand what's happening at first, it is an invaluable asset of tornado research. Probably the best animated GIF showing the entire cycle of a tornado's life. An image of tornado itself can be found here. This Doppler image of the horrific 2011 Joplin tornado also is of high quality and EV, although this image fits better as it is a GIF.

Articles in which this image appears

Mobile radar observation of tornadoes, History of tornado research, Tornado, Eye (cyclone), Radius of maximum wind, VORTEX projects

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena/Weather

Creator

VORTEX2 Team (technically Joshua Wurman, since he developed the software)

• Support as nominator – MemeGod _chat 18:03, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Agree about EV, it illustrates the concept well, and in a way the usual photographs of tornadoes don't. Moonreach (talk) 18:09, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 19:17, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Just a sidenote, the image captions in the articles have details that are missing in the image page description. The image page description can be improved? Bammesk (talk) 02:13, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 11:56, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 04:37, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. MER-C 11:09, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:05june-rapiddow-wide.gif --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 18:15, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 10 Nov 2024 at 18:31:34 (UTC)

Reason

Excellent EV for its article, visually (and conceptually) unusual, high-quality image with both good detail resolution and contrast.

Articles in which this image appears

Mordançage

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Photographic techniques, terms, and equipment

Creator

Stacey Svendsen

• Support as nominator – Moonreach (talk) 18:31, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - Ooh, I like it! MemeGod _chat 18:39, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - Trippy. Also interesting to see that gelatin is still being used today.  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 19:17, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 11:56, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Yann (talk) 14:35, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 04:36, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Self portrait (8618889472).jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 18:32, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 11 Nov 2024 at 10:08:37 (UTC)

Reason

Good quality and EV

Articles in which this image appears

National Library of Poland, National library

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture

Creator

Emptywords

• Support as nominator – EUPBR (talk) 10:08, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support, nice photo, great perspective for showing such a large subject. Toadspike [Talk] 22:54, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - Massive edifice. High quality.  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 18:26, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 03:00, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Carlosmarkos2345 (talk) 07:54, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Biblioteka Narodowa Warsaw 2022 aerial.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 10:30, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 13 Nov 2024 at 11:52:37 (UTC)

Reason

Unanimously featured on Commons. Well done focus stack.

Articles in which this image appears

Verbena hastata

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Plants/Others

Creator

Dominicus Johannes Bergsma

• Support as nominator – MER-C 11:52, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 18:25, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 02:44, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Carlosmarkos2345 (talk) 07:48, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - Thank you for nominating this photo.--Famberhorst (talk) 18:37, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support.–Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:34, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Zaadzetting van Verbena hastata, 17-08-2024. (d.j.b).jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 11:54, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 13 Nov 2024 at 11:55:56 (UTC)

Reason

Unanimously featured on Commons. Headline image.

Articles in which this image appears

Axillary wrasse

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish

Creator

Diego Delso

• Support as nominator – MER-C 11:55, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 18:23, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 02:43, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Carlosmarkos2345 (talk) 07:49, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – --Famberhorst (talk) 18:38, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Excellent image, good EV --Tagooty (talk) 05:34, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support.–Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:34, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Vagueta (Symphodus mediterraneus), Parque natural de la Arrábida, Portugal, 2022-07-19, DD 60.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 11:57, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 13 Nov 2024 at 23:22:17 (UTC)

Reason

High quality photo of WW2, showing a plane, field and explosion in one picture which makes for a pretty good photo

Articles in which this image appears

World War II, Aerial bombing of cities

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/History/World War II

Creator

Unknown author

• Support as nominator – Wcamp9 (talk) 23:22, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment – Suggest change title of nom. to Bombing of a Focke-Wulf aircraft plant. – Sca (talk) 15:03, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 00:34, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 13 Nov 2024 at 23:31:50 (UTC)

Reason

High quality and historical image showing the first launch from Cape Canaveral in 1950 of a V-2 Rocket, which led to the beginning of the U.S. being interested in space travel and the Space Age. It was (as the description of the image on Wikipedia says) truly the start of a new chapter.

Articles in which this image appears

V-2 rocket, Operation Paperclip

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/History/American

Creator

NASA/U.S. Army

• Support as nominator – Wcamp9 (talk) 23:31, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment could use some light restoration. I'm seeing a couple scratches, some dirt. Nothing crazy bad... probably 20 or 30 minutes, tops.  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 18:27, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment – Interesting historically that the U.S. was still using V-2s seven years after production began in nazi Germany – showing how advanced technically it was. Later in WWII many were built by slave labor. – Sca (talk) 15:08, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Conditional Support, if the restoration is done. Bammesk (talk) 03:42, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 00:34, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 14 Nov 2024 at 01:10:12 (UTC)

Reason

High quality image of the first astronauts in the first American spacesuits

Articles in which this image appears

Mercury Seven, Mercury spacesuit

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Science and engineering

Creator

NASA

• Support as nominator – Wcamp9 (talk) 01:10, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Technically subpar but it's semi-historic and good EV in the two articles it's in. Bammesk (talk) 03:38, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – ―Howard • 🌽³³ 15:23, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Moonreach (talk) 15:56, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support.–Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:33, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:The Mercury 7 (15258556433).jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 01:16, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 14 Nov 2024 at 01:19:10 (UTC)

Reason

High quality for it's time and a rare color photo taken during WW2, showing the aftermath of a very historically important event: the German Invasion of Poland which started World War II

Articles in which this image appears

Invasion of Poland

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/History/World War II

Creator

Julien Bryan

• Support as nominator – Wcamp9 (talk) 01:19, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose Low quality and size. Yann (talk) 16:25, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose. The photo doesn't really convey the moment; it took me a bit to even realize the glass was broken. Otherwise it's just a shot of a building and a flag. – Moonreach (talk) 19:03, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose; per above. – Hamid Hassani (talk) 05:59, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 01:54, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 14 Nov 2024 at 01:28:22 (UTC)

Reason

High quality, iconic, and shows the lack of trust in the government at the time of Watergate

Articles in which this image appears

Impeachment process against Richard Nixon, Watergate scandal, Richard Nixon

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/History/American

Creator

Marion S. Trikosko or Thomas J. O'Halloran

• Support as nominator – Wcamp9 (talk) 01:28, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Moonreach (talk) 15:55, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support.–Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:33, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Carlosmarkos2345 (talk) 07:53, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support, historic EV. Brandmeister^talk 18:37, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Impeach Nixon retouched.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 02:00, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 14 Nov 2024 at 01:41:58 (UTC)

Reason

Reports the launch of the first artificial satellite, historical

Articles in which this image appears

Space Race, Sputnik 1

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/History/Others

Creator

Universal Newsreel

• Support as nominator – Wcamp9 (talk) 01:41, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Not entirely sure as to the quality of this digitization. It's jittery, and the title screen seems corrupted somehow.  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 18:29, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose, for several separate reasons. The first is that this has analog artifacting that suggests it was transferred to (and later from) a tape; the second is digital artifacting, such as excess compression and combing. The third is more nuanced: I'm worried about the accuracy of this, given that it's an American artist's conception of an event that was known exclusively through reports by the Soviet Union, an entity with both the motive and habit of lying. To present this as a featured picture would, I think, be tantamount to endorsing it as factual, something we can't verify. I think it's a neat piece of history, but I don't think it makes the grade for featured picture. Moonreach (talk) 15:31, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose, as per Moonreach. Yann (talk) 20:18, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose; per Moonreach. – Hamid Hassani (talk) 05:57, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose, per Moonreach.–Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:33, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 02:01, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 14 Nov 2024 at 01:51:11 (UTC)

Reason

Super high-quality image of a full-body, contemporary portrait of Alexander Hamilton

Articles in which this image appears

Alexander Hamilton, Alexander Hamilton (Trumbull), John Trumbull

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Political

Creator

John Trumbull

• Support as nominator – Wcamp9 (talk) 01:51, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment – Caption? – Sca (talk) 13:40, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Added caption Wcamp9 (talk) 20:28, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Support – ―Howard • 🌽³³ 15:22, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 05:56, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support.–Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:33, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Carlosmarkos2345 (talk) 15:33, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Google Arts Project - Alexander Hamilton (1792 portrait) by John Trumbull.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 02:07, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Added image to Artwork/Paintings, as there is an article about the painting. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 02:07, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 14 Nov 2024 at 13:55:22 (UTC)

Reason

a high quality print of a iconic movie

Articles in which this image appears

Sherlock Jr.

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Culture, entertainment, and lifestyle/Film

Creator

Buster Keaton

• Support as nominator – Carlosmarkos2345 (talk) 13:55, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - I'm seeing some compression artefacts, but overall I think the quality is good for a movie this old.  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 18:31, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Yann (talk) 16:22, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 05:55, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Moonreach (talk) 15:53, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support.–Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:33, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Sherlock Jr. (1924).webm --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 13:56, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 14 Nov 2024 at 20:54:37 (UTC)

Reason

A high quality iconic photo which shows LBJ with Vietnam Troops. The photo is synonymous with LBJ's role in Vietnam sending Americans to fight in the war

Articles in which this image appears

Distinguished Service Cross (United States), Lyndon B. Johnson, October 1966

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/History/War

Creator

Yoichi Okamoto

• Support as nominator – Wcamp9 (talk) 20:54, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: Limited EV, as the medal is barely visible and the LBJ article doesn't mention his visit at all. Also, Wcamp9, you're making an awful lot of nominations—eight in the span of two days. Please consider slowing down so as not to flood the whole FPC page. --Paul_012 (talk) 23:23, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• There was a discussion some time ago that a maximum of 4 noms by one user would be an appropriate number. When old noms drop from the list, new ones can be added. --Janke | Talk 09:42, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Support — I agree the EV is borderline, but this is a good-quality copy of a well-composed photo, and the subject of a president conducting one of the duties of his office is worth something, I think. Moonreach (talk) 18:59, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support.–Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:33, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 21:00, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Nomination didn’t reach the necessary quorum for promotion. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 21:00, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2024 at 03:37:14 (UTC)

Reason

Early pioneers of radio science and technology in the United States including Charles Steinmetz, David Sarnoff, Irving Langmuir and Alfred Goldsmith in 1921, photographed next to the antenna feed wires of the New Brunswick Marconi Station, one of the first transatlantic radio links. Photo includes Albert Einstein as a visiting guest. The image has good EV in the History of radio article. I added it there yesterday. I rewrote this reason section (simpler and more to the point).

Articles in which this image appears

History of radio, Charles Steinmetz, David Sarnoff, New Brunswick Marconi Station, List of Marconi wireless stations, Marconi Company

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Science and engineering

Creator

Radio Corporation of America (RCA), photographer: unknown, restored by Bammesk

• Support as nominator – Bammesk (talk) 03:37, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose – While I'm a fan of Einstein, must suggest that a group shot of 20 is too diffuse for readers to focus on any one person. Also, the event seems less than significant. – Sca (talk) 13:41, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Oppose Even though Steinmetz looks badass in the photo, I'm inclined to agree. Bremps... 17:39, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• It isn't about the event or Einstein. It's about the 11 notable people who are in it (excluding Einstein), five of whom are pioneers in the development of radio in the U.S. The other six made major contributions. The location is a plus too, the photo was shot at the site of the most advanced transmitter in the U.S., one of the first transatlantic stations, the station had an important military role in WWI. And yes Einstein is in it, but it’s not an "Einstein photo". Bammesk (talk) 04:09, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Vertical perspective seems a bit distorted. -- Sca (talk) 14:20, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

He does look badass, it's great. Unfortunately I agree with you and the others about the shortcomings. Moonreach (talk) 20:15, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 06:56, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 19 Nov 2024 at 05:29:51 (UTC)

Reason

Infobox image; was featured unanimously in 5 days on Commons

Articles in which this image appears

Stongdey

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Landscapes

Creator

Tagooty

• Support as nominator – Tagooty (talk) 05:29, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment - It's in India. – Sca (talk) 15:03, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - High quality, and gives an idea just how small the village is. I agree with Sca that the caption doesn't quite give enough context, and that indicating India would help voters.  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 20:22, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• @Sca: I've added add'l info to the caption. --Tagooty (talk) 04:04, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 05:54, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. MER-C 11:17, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Yann (talk) 11:32, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support.–Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:33, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support — UnpetitproleX (talk) 04:58, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:NE View Stongdey Zanskar Jun24 A7CR 00966.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 06:14, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Added image to Places/Urban instead. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 06:14, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 19 Nov 2024 at 15:19:54 (UTC)

Reason

Colorful and high quality image of an important cardinal dressed in episcopal vestments.

Articles in which this image appears

Pietro Parolin, Cardinal Secretary of State

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Religious figures

Creator

Claude Truong-Ngoc

• Support as nominator – ―Howard • 🌽³³ 15:19, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - Feels a smidge underexposed. That being said, this is high quality "action" for the subject, and the robes certainly catch the eye. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 20:21, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 05:53, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Yann (talk) 11:30, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Moonreach (talk) 15:54, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support.–Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:33, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Cardinal Pietro Parolin par Claude Truong-Ngoc juillet 2021.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 19:12, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 20 Nov 2024 at 11:24:35 (UTC)

Reason

Unanimously featured on Commons. Good reproduction of a historic map.

Articles in which this image appears

Theatrum Orbis Terrarum etc.

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Diagrams, drawings, and maps/Maps

Creator

Abraham Ortelius

• Support as nominator – MER-C 11:24, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment – Dates from 1570. – Sca (talk) 14:58, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – better than the other Commons FP here. Was thinking of nominating it myself. Bammesk (talk) 15:09, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Yann (talk) 15:50, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Moonreach (talk) 15:54, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose clearly wrong. ^[Joke] Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 20:31, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• @OlifanofmrTennant: The issue is not whether the map is accurate, but whether it is a good representation for the article Theatrum Orbis Terrarum and others. Have you read this article? Yann (talk) 11:10, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• I struck the vote because the editor marked it as a joke. Bammesk (talk) 17:48, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Support  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 19:11, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support.–Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:33, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 02:46, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support — UnpetitproleX (talk) 04:56, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. Ratekreel (talk) 22:38, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Theatrum Orbis Terrarum, by Abraham Ortelius, World, 1572.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 12:08, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 20 Nov 2024 at 11:32:39 (UTC)

Reason

Unanimously featured on Commons. Illustrates article well.

Articles in which this image appears

Black-capped chickadee

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds

Creator

Rhododendrites

• Support as nominator – MER-C 11:32, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 19:12, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support.–Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:32, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 02:46, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Carlosmarkos2345 (talk) 22:25, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Black-capped chickadee (41417).jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 12:12, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 20 Nov 2024 at 15:28:26 (UTC)

Reason

Quality lead image of this nebula. Photographed by amateur astronomer, FP on Commons.

Articles in which this image appears

NGC 281

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Space/Looking out

Creator

Chuck Ayoub

• Support as nominator – Bammesk (talk) 15:28, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Yann (talk) 15:49, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 05:42, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support — Moonreach (talk) 17:49, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 19:12, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support.–Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:32, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. MER-C 17:29, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support — UnpetitproleX (talk) 04:56, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:PacMan Nebula.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 18:22, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 20 Nov 2024 at 15:51:40 (UTC)

Reason

High quality copy of one of a famous artist's lesser-known works

Articles in which this image appears

Tower of Babel (M. C. Escher)

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Artwork/Others

Creator

M. C. Escher

• Support as nominator – Moonreach (talk) 15:51, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment - The source given on the file page is not the same image, but a lower-res version, thus, there's no info about the true source of this candidate. --Janke | Talk 19:09, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  For a work in the public domain because of age, does it really matter? Moonreach (talk) 17:48, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Correct me if I am wrong but in reading FP criterion #6, we don't necessarily need the "true source". We need a "reliable source" to establish that there is no WP:OR (in contrast, color/tone, editing manipulations, etc.). Is "arthive.com" a reliable source? Bammesk (talk) 19:12, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 18:23, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 21 Nov 2024 at 18:20:37 (UTC)

Reason

High quality close-up photo of subject; featured on Arabic and German Wikipedias.

Articles in which this image appears

Pope Shenouda III of Alexandria, Pope of the Coptic Orthodox Church, List of Coptic Orthodox popes, Coptic Orthodox Church, Al-Gaddafi International Prize for Human Rights, 1923

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Religious figures

Creator

Chuck Kennedy

• Support as nominator – ―Howard • 🌽³³ 18:20, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Moonreach (talk) 17:53, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 19:12, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support.–Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:32, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – BarntToust 23:45, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 02:45, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:01, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Pope Shenouda III of Alexandria by Chuck Kennedy (Official White House Photostream).jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 19:49, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 22 Nov 2024 at 16:11:58 (UTC)

Reason

why you think it meets the FPC criteria and should be featured (check criteria first)

Articles in which this image appears

Gait (human)

FP category for this image

Featured pictures/Culture, entertainment, and lifestyle/Sport

Creator

Petar Milošević

• Support as nominator – Petar Milošević (talk) 16:11, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support The image illustrates what it aims to illustrate perfectly well in great lighting and high resolution. Now, a crop may be in order, but it's not a fatal issue. Bremps... 17:35, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Support per nom. Only way to improve is through video.  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 19:11, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support.–Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:32, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – yes it looks like a heel strike, but technically I don't think this qualifies as a heel strike. . . . . this shoe has a 1.5 inch thick heel padding, so by the time his heel lands on anything solid, his knee will be on top of his mid-foot. That makes it a mid-foot strike, technically. Very nice photo regardless, shows the running gait well. Bammesk (talk) 04:30, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support nice image! BarntToust 23:32, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support --EUPBR (talk) 13:48, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. MER-C 17:30, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 02:44, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Human running gait - terminal swing to heel strike (runner with Asics Metaspeed Edge "Paris"; 2024 Ljubljana Marathon).jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 18:10, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 22 Nov 2024 at 17:33:10 (UTC)

Reason

Exceeds technical requirements for featured picture. Is among Wikipedia's best work in illustrating the nature of the anarchy server.

Articles in which this image appears

2b2t

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Diagrams, drawings, and maps/Diagrams

Creator

IronException

• Support as nominator – Bremps... 17:33, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment — Not bad, but I think File:IronException 2b2t Spawn Render July 2019.png is more visually interesting, and the angle gives a better view of the field. Moonreach (talk) 17:52, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know, the nom version has a 3-D feel to it, it has more recognizable features IMO. Could be wrong. Bammesk (talk) 04:50, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Oppose — Quite unintelligible to a viewer not familiar with Minecraft. --Janke | Talk 18:11, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Excellent illustration of the server. ―Howard • 🌽³³ 13:13, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose – Visual information not readily intelligible to general readers/viewers. – Sca (talk) 14:17, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support — it's brilliantly illustrated, and viewers being unfamiliar with the subject does no effect on the quality of the image itself. I suppose that a really fine photo of, say, a circuit board should never be promoted to FP because most people don't have a clue of what that is? The logic ain't logic-ing. This pic is brilliant! BarntToust 23:09, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Bammesk (talk) 03:01, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Carlosmarkos2345 (talk) 15:15, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 02:43, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support, although you missed the chance to add "the oldest anarchy server in Minecraft" (if you get the reference). :) E_F⁵ 14:37, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose I'm not sure that this would be depicting the subject in a compelling way. If a person was unfamiliar with Minecraft, they would just see a weirdly shaded illustration and not be inclined to be like "What is this?". The given subject matter seems sort of narrow too, as it only concerns this Minecraft server and doesn't depict Minecraft as a whole. I might be misinterpreting WP:FPCR but I feel like this shouldn't be a Featured image. Fathoms Below (talk) 17:39, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• I disagree with your second sentence (just the second sentence) regarding "viewer familiarity". We are an encyclopedia, our yardstick is notability, not familiarity. We can't expect everyone who refers to an encyclopedia to be familiar with every subject. In fact, people refer to encyclopedias because they are not familiar. Bammesk (talk) 03:25, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• After much thought, Oppose. I went back and forth with myself on this, and spent a lot of time looking at the image in detail. It's information-rich, but only in that it captures a complete lack of coherence. I once opposed an image of tornado destruction for this; in both cases, the destruction was so complete that the image didn't make any kind of visual sense to me. I've also thought over Bammesk's response to my earlier comment, and I think I still disagree about this being a good showcase of the server as a 3D environment. In addition to the visual noise, this is an orthographic projection rather than one with converging perspective, and that stops it from looking like a real 3D space. I can't even really say I think this illustrates the server itself well, apart from the anarchic nature, because I'm not a Minecraft player and I have no idea what the various terrain elements represent, either in their own terms or in gameplay. It's good that we have this picture for this article, but even with the understanding the featured images don't have to be aesthetically pleasing I don't think it's feature-worthy. Moonreach (talk) 19:48, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Oppose – per above _ZZ^Z'S 00:07, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 18:12, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• There is no consensus for promotion. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 18:12, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 22 Nov 2024 at 19:18:26 (UTC)

Reason

High quality image of a notable bronze with a fairly well-developed article.

Articles in which this image appears

Mao Gong ding, Chinese ritual bronzes, Ye Gongchuo

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Artwork/Others

Creator

National Palace Museum, cropped and rotated by  — Chris Woodrich (talk)

• Support as nominator –  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 19:18, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support even though it's a tad dark. --Janke | Talk 15:01, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Bammesk (talk) 02:33, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – ―Howard • 🌽³³ 11:16, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support --EUPBR (talk) 13:46, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 02:42, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 05:26, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:00, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Ding cauldron of Duke Mao.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 19:44, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 23 Nov 2024 at 03:09:05 (UTC)

Reason

Excellent encyclopedic value to the articles it is in and is very educational.

Articles in which this image appears

Atmospheric entry, Artemis I

FP category for this image

Not sure if Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Space/Understanding or Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Space/Getting there is right.

Creator

NASA's Johnson Space Center

• Support as nominator – Cowboygilbert - (talk) ♥ 03:09, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose – Visual information not readily intelligible to general readers/viewers, and 25 min. is too long for a TFP. – Sca (talk) 14:15, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • I don't see how length plays a factor for POTD, it only matters about sourcing of the blurb. (Coming from someone who schedules mostly featured media) Cowboygilbert - (talk) ♥ 01:08, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • BTW main-page (POTD, TFP) is not a FP criterion. What goes or doesn't go on the main-page is sorted out by main-page contributors. Featured contents have their own criteria, and main-page considerations isn't a featured content criterion. Bammesk (talk) 17:37, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose – per Sca. --Janke | Talk 14:49, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak support – There's stuff I like here and stuff I don't. The EV is excellent; I've never seen an unbroken recording of a complete descent from space before. The fire trail during the initial atmospheric entry is phenomenal. But there's a lot of footage that's just banging sounds and visual glare. I get that this was probably the best video possible under these conditions, so that isn't enough to kill my support, but I doubt anyone is actually going to sit through the whole thing is wonderment. That said, I do still support the uncut video for EV purposes, and the argument that it's too long doesn't seem fair to me, given the number of feature-length films we've promoted. Moonreach (talk) 16:55, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• The banging sounds are trajectory controls. (per the first few seconds of video caption, also: [7]) Bammesk (talk) 02:43, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  I caught that. I don't have a problem with them; what I meant was that the video is underwhelming in the portions when that's all that's happening. Moonreach (talk) 15:14, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Support – Good EV in the Atmospheric entry article. I like it all, the sounds, glares, parachutes, etc. The fact that it's uncut and in real time adds to its EV, and that it takes only 25 minutes to go through the entire journey. (It's a nice ride, but I settle for the video!) Bammesk (talk) 02:31, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support per Bammesk –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 05:26, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Vinícius O. (talk) 18:51, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – _ZZ^Z'S 00:09, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Reentry video as Orion returns from Artemis I.webm --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 07:55, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 24 Nov 2024 at 17:17:26 (UTC)

Reason

Well-composed, slightly surreal shot of Big Brutus, the largest surviving power shovel of its type, which is now a museum.

Articles in which this image appears

Big Brutus, West Mineral, Kansas

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Vehicles/Land

Creator

Anry skyhead

• Support as nominator – Moonreach (talk) 17:17, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment - shot from an unfortunate angle, would be better obliquely from the front. --Janke | Talk 18:45, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Agree. A three-quarter shot from the other side would be more illustrative. -- Sca (talk) 14:11, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 18:52, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 25 Nov 2024 at 15:32:43 (UTC)

Reason

Great quality copy of a hand-colored short silent film. The film itself isn't especially famous, so while the file has obvious EV for the article about it specifically, I think its highest value is illustrating the film's genre, that of the trick film. Trick films were essentially special effects demos and the genre went extinct as the industry matured. This is a great snapshot of what cinema looked like in the age before established conventions.

Articles in which this image appears

Trick film, The Infernal Cauldron

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Culture, entertainment, and lifestyle/Film

Creator

Georges Méliès, Star Film Company

• Support as nominator – Moonreach (talk) 15:32, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - GamerPro64 23:33, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support as animator ;-) - been in the business for 40 years... --Janke | Talk 10:59, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - Carlosmarkos2345 14:54, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment – The link here has a restoration copyright claim (the last frame). Does it hold water? I doubt it, but I am not sure. Hope others can opine. Bammesk (talk) 19:05, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Restorations for still images tend to be ignored in terms of copyright. That being said, I see that the 4K restoration of Night of the Living Dead was granted a copyright, so there exists a possibility for a moving image.  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 22:41, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Ok thanks. Some restorations don't rise to the level of originality. Suggest placing an inquiry at Commons:Village pump/Copyright and if they dismiss the claim, then it's all good. Bammesk (talk) 17:30, 17 November 2024 (UTC) . . . . I placed an inquiry for an opinion on Commons. Bammesk (talk) 02:24, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• @Chris:, regarding granting of copyright to the 4K restoration of Night of the Living Dead, the only source I could find is This film review, which is not binding. I suppose there is a copyright notice on the restored film itself, which wouldn't be binding either, because that would just be a claim. I found This discussion in a forum (regarding the 4K restoration), it mirrors the Commons discussion Here. Interestingly, the forum discussion says a 'copyright registration' is just a registration, and not equivalent to the 'granting of copyright'. From what I gathered, the 4K restored Night of the Living Dead was released with additional documentary footage, not film footage, but additional explanatory content, therefore the explanatory additions themselves could be covered by copyright. Just my non-expert opinion. Bammesk (talk) 02:42, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Support – I am confident the nominated film (which has no music) will survive a "deletion request" on Commons. Compared to older copies of the film (on YouTube), the restoration is solely technical. Granted the restoration must have started from a good quality scan of the original film. The restoration contains no creative additions of content. Based on This discussion and the feedback I got Here, solely improving the technical quality of a film does not warrant new copyrights. Bammesk (talk) 02:42, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Le Chaudron infernal (Georges Méliès, 1903).webm --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 15:33, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 26 Nov 2024 at 18:47:30 (UTC)

Reason

Unanimously featured on Commons. Headline image.

Articles in which this image appears

Large milkweed bug

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Insects

Creator

Rhododendrites

• Support as nominator – MER-C 18:47, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 22:35, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 02:41, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 05:26, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:00, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – _ZZ^Z'S 00:09, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support — Hounaam (talk) 21:21, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Large milkweed bug (23188).jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 18:48, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 26 Nov 2024 at 19:28:27 (UTC)

Reason

Unanimously featured on Commons. Headline image.

Articles in which this image appears

Lysimachia maritima

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Plants/Flowers

Creator

Stephan Sprinz

• Support as nominator – MER-C 19:28, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 22:35, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 02:40, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment - I wonder if this is really typical; other photos show the plant growing more in mats, rather than singly. [8]--Janke | Talk 20:38, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  This plant didn't grow alone either, as you can see in other pictures I took: ( e.g. https://commons.wikimedia.orgview_image.php?q=Wikipedia:Featured_picture_candidates/November-2024&sq=&lang=&file=File:Bl%C3%BChendes_Strand-Milchkraut_(Glaux_maritima)_am_Strand_von_Norderney_01.jpg ) --Stephan Sprinz (talk) 16:03, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  OK, thanks, Support then! --Janke | Talk 19:52, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 05:25, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:59, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – _ZZ^Z'S 00:10, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support — Hounaam (talk) 21:21, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Blühendes Strand-Milchkraut (Glaux maritima) am Strand von Norderney 03.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 19:30, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 26 Nov 2024 at 22:38:01 (UTC)

Reason

good quality image used as lead

Articles in which this image appears

Douglas Fairbanks Jr., 1909

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Entertainment

Creator

Allan warren

• Support as nominator – Yann (talk) 22:38, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment – It's not sharp at full size, but it's reasonably Ok when viewed at ~ 2000 x 3000 pixels. That may be enough for a 1970s photo. Same with the other nomination Here. Bammesk (talk) 02:22, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 05:25, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 13:42, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 03:14, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support — Hounaam (talk) 21:21, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Douglas Fairbanks Jnr 4 Allan Warren.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 22:39, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 26 Nov 2024 at 23:12:48 (UTC)

Reason

good quality image used as lead

Articles in which this image appears

Imogen Hassall

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Entertainment

Creator

Allan warren

• Support as nominator – Yann (talk) 23:12, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment – Comparatively obscure. – Sca (talk) 13:46, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 13:41, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Vinícius O. (talk) 18:52, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – ―Howard • 🌽³³ 23:49, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 01:10, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 03:13, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support — Hounaam (talk) 21:21, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Imogen Hassell by Allan Warren.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 23:13, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 27 Nov 2024 at 16:57:35 (UTC)

Reason

high quality copy of a masterpiece drama of Chaplin, one of the few films where he doesn't act.

Articles in which this image appears

A Woman of Paris

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Culture, entertainment, and lifestyle/Film

Creator

Charlie Chaplin

• Support as nominator – Yann (talk) 16:57, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Carlosmarkos2345 (talk) 12:16, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 05:25, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Vinícius O. (talk) 18:54, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 13:37, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 03:12, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:A Woman of Paris, A Drama of Fate (1923) by Charlie Chaplin.webm --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 17:18, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]